A thick blanket of legal stipulations aims to keep YouTube's IP addresses, usernames, and activity safe from third parties--and Viacom won't have direct access to it.
Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.
Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.
About Digital Media
The Web is now the place to go for news and entertainment. Look here for the latest on blogs, music, video, virtual worlds, social networking and more.
Add this feed to your online news reader
Digital Media topics
If that were to happen, RIAA and MPAA would be allowed to use it as evidence against individuals from what I understand.
Don't think that it can't be done.
It is amazing how clueles some people can be. How can you comment on a corperations morals when you clearly have no idea what is going on?
I do not give permission for the courts, or google or God himself to pass on my information to anybody unless I sign a waiver personally.
******* stupid old crusty government and their control freak tactics are starting to really **** me off.
- by private-internet July 18, 2008 8:17 AM PDT
- The issue is not about privacy - YouTube is a public service. If you are violating the law in public - you should face the consequences. Freedom of speech is not about freedom from the consequence of the speech.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
-
- by galacticgufus October 28, 2008 9:29 PM PDT
- so what are you saying? that it doesn't matter that our personal information is being handed over? if you believe that, why don't you just go ahead and post all of your personal information here.
- Like this
-
(12 Comments)i'm glad that i avoid any viacom 'content at all times, whether over tv or youtube. therefore if viacom ends up with the information i'll make google look better.