Comments on: Warner Music Group and YouTube talking again
Six months after Warner Music's songs disappeared from YouTube, the two companies are trying to hash out their differences, sources say.
Six months after Warner Music's songs disappeared from YouTube, the two companies are trying to hash out their differences, sources say.
Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.
Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.
The Web is now the place to go for news and entertainment. Look here for the latest on blogs, music, video, virtual worlds, social networking and more.
Add this feed to your online news reader
I think the larger artists who already have their name out their would be smart to Warner ASAP. They clearly don't get it and probably never will.
My vote of no confidence.
I do sometimes see a "this video was removed due to a copyright claim by WMG", but all that does is make WMG look bad, and those videos just pop up again within minutes anyway.
- by SmoothIAm July 11, 2009 4:10 PM PDT
- I knew WMG would be back. Warner doesn't really have any big new acts today. They only had about 400 million views on their channel not 4 billion views like Universal. Hell, you got home grown Youtube talent like Fred with 400 million views. I wasn't surprise when Youtube told Warner to stick it. Youtube is the new MTV and a lot of Warner acts was really hurt over the last six months not being on Youtube. Especially a lot of RnB acts on Atlantic like Trey Songz, Musiq Soulchild, all the acts on Puffy's Bad Boy Records like Day 26, and DK.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
-
- by Renegade Knight July 21, 2009 11:58 AM PDT
- There is a lot of truth to Youtube being the new MTV. That's what my kids use it for. It's how they find new music.
- Like this
-
(8 Comments)