Version: 2008

Comments on: Congress to probe P2P sites over 'inadvertent sharing'

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform reopens investigation into P2P venues like Lime Wire in the wake of security leaks involving President Obama's helicopter.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (17 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by GKrynen April 21, 2009 11:13 AM PDT
Inadvertant, as in the software scans the My Documents folder, and shares all files of certain types because the USER does not go in and change the default settings. Sounds like the software companies need to have zero file types AUTO-selected AND users need to learn how to use a tool before actually using it. I believe this is called reading and learning! GASP! There are things to learn about new software packages, we can control what it does, wow how novel.
Reply to this comment
by biffhenerson April 21, 2009 11:33 AM PDT
Guns dont kill people. People kill people. Peer to Peer file sharing software systems work great. Its the users of these systems that have no clue what they are sharing. If the software is installed on a top secret government computer to download music, it could be exposing all the goodies on that computer to the world. P2P = Good. People = Bad/Stupid.
Reply to this comment
by d3vildog69 April 21, 2009 11:42 AM PDT
Word, you sprechen sie Truth
by Thranx April 21, 2009 1:19 PM PDT
Very true. Congressional idiots thinking that the content of files distributed by software are the responsibility of a company that codes the file transfer software and maintains said software... should learn a bit more before they start swinging thier commitee stick.

Are you going to blame this thing called the Internet. Are you going to bring the CEO of internet before a commitee if progress isn't made? How about Microsoft? Get Steve Balmer up there and ask him why a social security number could possibly be allowed to be entered into a text file, saved to the computer, and then maybe even copied to a thumb drive! How outlandish. Also, there's this other smaller company called Linux that I think is controled by some guy named Torvald. I hear that medical records are sometimes moved around in this Linux thing... we should nail him too.

And while you're at it, lets nail the USPS. I hear they are transfering pieces of paper containing medical records and social security numbers and even credit cards. This has to be stopped.
by JCPayne April 21, 2009 11:34 AM PDT
Didn't CNN report like a month ago that Iran had the blueprints of the presidential helicopter.
Reply to this comment
by Viv Collins April 21, 2009 12:56 PM PDT
Why is this a software issue? its not its an issue with work places having computers that normal users are allowed to install software on.

Lock down the workstations and implement a proper user security regime that does not allow plain vanilla users instal privileges.
Reply to this comment
by SergeM256 April 21, 2009 1:37 PM PDT
Now they blame LimeWire for not doing enough to protect government secrets, which is ridiculous. Government, if it wants to protect its secrets, should establish proper security regiment, such as - only authorized software on government computers, secret data only on authorized computers only in authorized areas, computers not to be used for personal use and not to be taken out of security area - just some simple, common sense precautions, the same rules and procedures that existed for decades for traditional paper documents.
by inachu1 April 21, 2009 1:40 PM PDT
Oh I am sure it was a Jane Doe or John Doe who brought their laptop from home and connected it to the White House network without telling anyone.

Typical replies between john doe and jane doe.... May I bring I laptop to work its security is up to date.
White House network security guru.... sure why not! We trust you.
Reply to this comment
by og_gta April 21, 2009 1:54 PM PDT
That's y r-tards shouldn't use them on either their job computer or computer with important files. In fact, doesn't LimeWire ask you where to share your files and/or choose what to share? You can always tell it where to scan and what to scan.

also, there is a way to turn off sharing if you don't want to.

maybe they should stick to torrent sites, but then again they're to stupid for that, lol.

ppl are so stupid and don't even slow down to look at what they are doing. Then later on we get reports of types like this.

People need to smarten up a bit. Go back to school and pay a lil more attention, maybe that way we can take out all the retards from this world and make for better... or for worse lol.
Reply to this comment
by unknown unknown April 21, 2009 2:09 PM PDT
I would be more concerned about the apparently lack of security in these government organizations that allows people to install and use unauthorized software.

As for people inadvertently sharing, you can not legislate against ignorance it's just to pervasive. These are the same people who get spyware and viruses because they mindlessly click yes on everything that pops up.

Limewire will show you every file you have shared and will allow you to opt not to share files in that list and has for sometime.
Reply to this comment
by njpcxprt April 21, 2009 4:33 PM PDT
Lock down the computers and don't let people install this stuff.
Don't allow thumb drives or for users to burn CDs/DVDs
Hold people responsible for the systems they leave on the train, in the hotel room or wherever these morons lose government equipment.

The government "loses" hundreds of computers every year. Maybe that's how this stuff is getting out.
Reply to this comment
by jonathan_bennion April 21, 2009 6:20 PM PDT
If this is the beginning of government-led oversight of P2P, in any scope, which country is going to have first dibs on the next P2P network for trading global proprietary or copyrighted stuff? Is there an international organization along the lines of ICAAN that could spawn international enforcement in the interest of an establishment or country, or at least define 'inadvertant sharing' to a global audience?
Reply to this comment
by BryanSD April 21, 2009 6:59 PM PDT
The user may have not wanted his documents shared via P2P, but there is nothing inadvertent in the employee loading P2P software on the same PC that houses classified/sensitive information. The negligence here is not the P2P software companies, but the user installing P2P software in the first place on the same system that has access to sensitive Federal related documents. There is also negligence on the part of the user's employer for allowing sensitive material to be placed on a system where the user had rights to install P2P software. These politicians need to be looking in their own backyard..
Reply to this comment
by fdunn3 April 22, 2009 4:05 AM PDT
Good. I hope they take down all those bandwidth-sucking sites.
Reply to this comment
by Dalkorian April 22, 2009 10:17 AM PDT
Thinking is a skill that needs to be practices sometimes, else the brain atrophies. Say I post the blueprints of Marine One on a public post board outside the local grocery store. Is the grocery store at fault, or the public post board, or me? Why?

Now move this online and explain the difference, or try to. "They didn't know?" Since when is ignorance an excuse for breaking the law? "Gee officer, I didn't know it was illegal to rape a 5 year old while driving 150 MPH through a school playground. Can I go now?"

Find government computers with P2P software on it, then find who is supposed to be responsible for that machine. Persecute them with the full force of the law (leaking state secrets - is that treason?). You can't legislate against stupidity, but you can punish it!
by Kainchild April 22, 2009 11:37 AM PDT
It's weird how Limewire still hasn't been sued when every other P2P site has. This seems to be giving more validation to the rumors that Limewire is secretly working with the FBI and CIA to crack down on pirates. It also explains the rumors about why the program randomly gives computers a lot of "viruses" as well. Though, from the looks of it, they finally messed up. I guess that's what happens when our government sleeps with the enemy so to speak.
Reply to this comment
by saidin43 April 22, 2009 12:56 PM PDT
on the corporate\gov side of things, it doesn't hurt to block the ports that these apps use. I am a 3rd level network tech at my job and we sometimes get alerts regarding a computer running limewire trying to access malicious ranges from somewhere in our network. We track down the user and remove the offending app from their machine. It also helps if there is a firewall policy set so that if the user isn't on the corporate network, the firewall disables certain ports, limiting usability of non approved apps when the user isn't on the desired network.
Reply to this comment
(17 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.

About Digital Media

The Web is now the place to go for news and entertainment. Look here for the latest on blogs, music, video, virtual worlds, social networking and more.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Digital Media topics

advertisement
advertisement