Comments on: NASA's next node will be named...
The module likely won't be named for comedian Steven Colbert, even though he technically won the online vote. But perhaps NASA will be generous enough to name a toilet for him.
The module likely won't be named for comedian Steven Colbert, even though he technically won the online vote. But perhaps NASA will be generous enough to name a toilet for him.
Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.
Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.
The Web is now the place to go for news and entertainment. Look here for the latest on blogs, music, video, virtual worlds, social networking and more.
Add this feed to your online news reader
MUWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Seriously though don't name the toilet after him... look what happened to Prince John of Rotthinham.
Can you tell i voted for Gaia? XD
VIA LA COLBERT!
VIA LA COLBERT!
VIA LA COLBERT!
VIA LA COLBERT!
VIA LA COLBERT!
VIA LA COLBERT!
VIA LA COLBERT!
VIA LA COLBERT!
VIA LA COLBERT!
VIA LA COLBERT!
VIA LA COLBERT!
VIA LA COLBERT!
No. We need to expand beyond this rock. The sooner the better. If not to expand, then to survive at all. NASA and nanotech efforts are the most important endeavors we have.
It's a little bit easier to just clean up, explore, and protect our damn sphere.
Do research next time. Here's a non-exhaustive list of 50 things that NASA helped bring to our world through its research: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/50-years-50-giant-leaps-how-nasa-rocked-our-world-879377.html
Don't run your mouth without thinking first. There are plenty of things to come out of NASA other than pictures of space.
This has nothing to do with finding a new place to live. Better fuel efficiency (better almost anything efficiency... if something can be rated in terms of efficiency, NASA can probably make it more efficient... life-support systems, recycling systems, etc.), better and safer building materials, safer travel on both land and in the air, renewable energy (NASA puts money into solar power, the sun powers their little toys out there and they want to get the most out of it).
How can anyone with half a brain not realize that there is so much to gain from NASA?
Still, NASA needs to stay, just the management teams need to be fired.
I'm still unconvinced we need to pour such a massive amount of money into NASA every year. Those 50 innovations are interesting, but please think about what NASA's budget is, and if innovations like that can come from a non-space organization.
I like the Colbert Show, but as he has done little more than make a mockery of the organization, and not contributed more than satirized publicity to it, he simply does not deserve naming rights. If someone famous, that did not provide direct contribution to the agency's goals or success, deserved such rights, I would think Gene Roddenberry, or George Lucus, or Jules Verne would certainly be more appropriate.
The name Serenity falls inline with the other module's names, so does Tranquility, of which both you might expect to achieve after either relieving yourself, or getting a good dose of oxygen in space (does that satisfy your desire for humor CN?). A toilet named after Colbert, is quite appropriate, provided he agrees with such, that much he does deserve for this antic.
- by jmcconnor April 14, 2009 12:48 PM PDT
- Flame on, flamers...flame on.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(30 Comments)SERENITY! ROCKS!!!