Version: 2008

Comments on: Talks break down; Warner Music pulls videos from YouTube

Warner walks away from YouTube at a time when Google's video site is renegotiating licensing deals with the four top music labels.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (21 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by Dylan_Wisor December 20, 2008 9:48 AM PST
What's with CNET's sudden fascination with digital copyright?
Reply to this comment
by Dave_at_Recombinant December 20, 2008 10:13 AM PST
My guess is, the brass at Warner are being *eviscerated* by managers of their top recording acts over this decision. One would think the greater focus at WMG would be in creating new revenue streams, rather than twisting the arms of paying customers.
Reply to this comment
by unknown unknown December 20, 2008 10:42 AM PST
I am willing to bet that greed was the biggest factor in warner pulling their music.
Reply to this comment
by sgo7 December 20, 2008 11:07 AM PST
Like who cares... Bye Warner. Don't let the door hit you in the backside.
Reply to this comment
by jedhorovitz December 20, 2008 11:08 AM PST
You can see all those videos and more at SINGINGFOOL.COM. Both YouTube and WMG are playing hardball and missing the point. Music Videos will always be more of a promotional tool than a product.
Reply to this comment
by Wickedashtray December 20, 2008 11:24 AM PST
Youtube isn't "playing hardball". Warner is simply still in the dark ages thinking they are indispensable. Warner needs Youtube far more than youtube needs warner. Warner CEO was even so stupid to say that the makers of Guitar Hero weren't paying enough for Warners music. Keep in mind much of the music were tunes that were no longer making money. Additionally, kids don't have any specific preference for bands, they are simply buying things like the Aerosmith pack because its campy and fun, something that could have been done with any number of other groups. Warner has made millions from these kinds of things yet they still insist that they are being screwed. If they keep acting the way they are, they haven't seen nothing yet.......
Reply to this comment
by SJ2571 December 20, 2008 3:56 PM PST
"Warner has made millions from these kinds of things yet they still insist that they are being screwed" -- Never were more truer words spoken! The record companies are always acting like they're on the brink of Chapter 11 Bankruptcy, when it's simply not true and everyone knows it. No wonder they have such a bad business rep.
by colamix December 20, 2008 4:18 PM PST
They don't need Youtube any more than they needed Napster...NOT. Personally I hope they continue burning bridges until every single venue avoids them like the plague they are. The sooner their crooked mafia-like business model goes extinct the better.
Reply to this comment
by 3rdalbum December 21, 2008 12:39 AM PST
Imagine if Warner had got its way. Then Youtube would have been paying Warner for the privilege of hosting its advertisements!
Reply to this comment
by macrhino December 21, 2008 5:03 AM PST
Wow Madonna and Linkin Park gone! Will anybody notice?
Reply to this comment
by 2opinionated December 21, 2008 10:05 AM PST
I'm sorry for that!!!
However I think it's their loss and their artists'
I wouldn't want to be under a contract with them

It goes to show how much they don't get the new model
Poor Warner Music, going the way of the dinosaur.

See you Warner!!! Or maybe not...

Mario
Reply to this comment
by gabeheim December 21, 2008 11:57 AM PST
I wonder how many sales Warner will lose as a result of this decision? In the past few years, I have made most of my decisions to buy a digital track after finding a video on youtube and deciding I like the song. Sorry, the 15 or 30 second preview is not enough for me, and it's been easier to find music on youtube than on last.fm.
Reply to this comment
by AppleSuxLeo December 21, 2008 2:31 PM PST
So the RIAA is an Indian Giver ;)
Reply to this comment
by kdrobb2k December 21, 2008 5:41 PM PST
Is this really news? With a few keystrokes this junk can be on your PC in under a minute. The muSICK industry is still in denial eight years after Napster.
Reply to this comment
by willwill222 December 21, 2008 9:13 PM PST
How would the record label make money off of free music videos on the internet? They're a bunch of idiots that need to pay their artists more instead of free loading for themselves.
Reply to this comment
by December 22, 2008 2:10 AM PST
This is the bit that gets me

"Until then, we simply cannot accept terms that fail to appropriately and fairly compensate recording artists, songwriters, labels and publishers for the value they provide."

This is from the people that have consistently screwed artists and songwriters for years and years then happily discarded them once they stop showing the same levels of profit. Now that they are starting to realise that they've messed up and that there's no place for them in the future of the music industry, they're attempting to play the sympathy card. Absolutely shameless
Reply to this comment
by Thegirlfromipanema December 22, 2008 7:54 AM PST
Let's just leave the old stuff like Warner what it is and look at new and innovative concepts, great new sounds and free to use, anytime anywhere.

I found this site called www.tribeofnoise.com , they have all this original, globally collected music by fabulous musicians who choose to share their music using a creative commons license. You can totally add it onto your videos (once you remove the warner?s music) ? you can even use the music legally in commercials, etc. The musicians put it out there in the hopes of getting way more exposure and getting heard by more people. If you use it anywhere, you just have to acknowledge the musician. You get new sounds, the musicians get heard, win-win.
Reply to this comment
by M C December 22, 2008 10:31 PM PST
Why does Warner want to screw its artists like that?

As a musician who wants to be seen, I can say I would never sign to Warner, as they clearly put their corporate bottom line ahead of their relationship with any partners, vendors or employees.

Another example of how major labels are dead.
Reply to this comment
by drywallrocker February 17, 2009 5:54 AM PST
this sucks it screws up youtube video's if these arse hole's don't get smart and quit screwing around i pay for my music but if they screw up my youtube video which are done for nonprofit then i will never buy their **** again
Reply to this comment
by SPrule February 23, 2009 2:44 AM PST
that sucks mann
they deleted ALL simple plan's music videos
and they're like my favourite band ever!
and youtube is my life coz it's the only place where i can watch all of their videos.
screw themm!
Reply to this comment
by March 20, 2009 5:50 PM PDT
this is exactly why I don't feel bad about downloading music for free anymore. WMG has got some greedy and ignorant people running their biz!
Reply to this comment
(21 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.

About Digital Media

The Web is now the place to go for news and entertainment. Look here for the latest on blogs, music, video, virtual worlds, social networking and more.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Digital Media topics

advertisement
advertisement