Version: 2008

Comments on: Veoh wins copyright infringement lawsuit

Video-sharing site is found to have complied with the DMCA, potentially bolstering Google's YouTube defense against Viacom's $1 billion copyright infringement lawsuit.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (8 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by kidtechguru August 28, 2008 7:01 AM PDT
Veoh should deserved to be fined...

www.KidTechGuru.blogspot.com
Reply to this comment
by Renegade Knight August 28, 2008 7:12 AM PDT
The law says otherwise. Good. the DMCA takedown provision is open for abuse, and is activly abused to block legitimate fair use, and competition. The least it can do is have the safe harbour provision work as intended.
by badasscat August 28, 2008 7:35 AM PDT
Except that the law says they shouldn't. And I hope that all of you here who have been brainwashed by the RIAA and MPAA come to realize this at some point. Greedy corporations want all the money they can get; that doesn't mean the law is always on their side. We now have conclusive proof of that in the form of a legal ruling in Veoh's case, and I expect we'll see the same result with Google.

These frivolous lawsuits need to stop, and the RIAA and MPAA need to start respecting the laws that they themselves helped draft.
by thelemurking August 28, 2008 8:33 AM PDT
I can't help but to wonder if you trolled to drive up hits to your blog which I refuse to click.
Reply to this comment
by skeptic47 August 28, 2008 10:08 AM PDT
You neglected to mention the judge said "the decision rendered here is confined to the particular combination of facts in this case and is not intended to push the bounds of the safe harbor so wide that less scrupulous service providers may claim its protection." Many copyright owners license to Veoh; not many do the same to YouTube. We're talking apples and oranges here.
Reply to this comment
by mattflaschen August 28, 2008 9:40 PM PDT
"Many copyright owners license to Veoh; not many do the same to YouTube. We're talking apples and oranges here." Thing is, DMCA Safe Harbor has nothing to do with whether the host pays for licenses. As long as they comply with the DMCA procedures (which both Veoh and YouTube do), they're safe. The facts are the same where it counts.
by mpitogo August 28, 2008 1:13 PM PDT
Conversely, Viacom has engaged in massive corporate greed taking advantage of content creators and milking the consumer for every penny.
Reply to this comment
by Lerianis August 31, 2008 12:15 PM PDT
I was wondering when someone would bring that up, which I happen to agree with that statement. Basically Veoh is the same as Youtube, when it comes down to it.... if they are not in violation of the DMCA, then Google isn't either.
(8 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.

About Digital Media

The Web is now the place to go for news and entertainment. Look here for the latest on blogs, music, video, virtual worlds, social networking and more.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Digital Media topics

advertisement
advertisement