Comments on: Note to privacy advocates: Good luck
Privacy advocates have an ax to grind with Google for helping to move more of our lives into the public realm. But there's a long list of others in the same camp.
Privacy advocates have an ax to grind with Google for helping to move more of our lives into the public realm. But there's a long list of others in the same camp.
Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.
Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.
The Web is now the place to go for news and entertainment. Look here for the latest on blogs, music, video, virtual worlds, social networking and more.
Add this feed to your online news reader
Frankly, the 'privacy nuts' are going overboard here, and Google needs to STOMP ON THEM HARD. I am all for privacy when you have a reasonable expectation of privacy (such as in your home).
Anywhere else however.... you are fair game, and that INCLUDES when you step out of your home into the wide outdoors.
IF by having rights to privacy means that you have unlimited privacy, then I have really bad news for paparazzi and anyone with a digital camera that does not get permission from the intended target(s), including buildings, vehicles and people. What about the people that attend sporting events, whose faces, actions and vulgarities are captured on video? Do they get to sue Universities and broadcasters for showing their face or their goofiness for all of us to see? Do they get to pass on consequential infamy, when all they wanted to do was to watch a sporting game?
I'm no apologist for Google, but a Right to privacy is neither absolute nor guaranteed. It comes down to four words: Reasonable Expectation of Privacy.
Screw Google...
Currently homeowners are not told in advance that their homes are going to be put on Google Street View. By the time they find out and ask for its removal, it may be too late. Because of the obvious security risk created by Google Street View, Google should use an opt in approach. The homes and other property of homeowners should not be posted on Google Street View without the express advance permission of residents.
American Homeowners Grassroots Alliance
Serving the interests of the nation's 75 million homeowners and future homeowners since 1984.
The American Homeowners Grassroots Alliance is a nonpartisan consumer advocacy organization dedicated to assisting the nation's 75 million homeowners understand significant policy issues affecting homeowners and homeownership, and empowering homeowners to make their voices heard by state and federal officials.
Visit our web site http://www.americanhomeowners.org.
"Google takes privacy very seriously" - Just because they can, doesn't mean they want to - or do so in an inappropriate way. Isn't Google the company that refused to hand over viewing YouTube records to Viacom?
IMHO, I see no hypocrisy here.
Currently homeowners are not told in advance that their homes are going to be put on Google Street View. By the time they find out and ask for its removal, it may be too late. Because of the obvious security risk created by Google Street View, Google should use an opt in approach. The homes and other property of homeowners should not be posted on Google Street View without the express advance permission of residents.
American Homeowners Grassroots Alliance
Serving the interests of the nation's 75 million homeowners and future homeowners since 1984.
The American Homeowners Grassroots Alliance is a nonpartisan consumer advocacy organization dedicated to assisting the nation's 75 million homeowners understand significant policy issues affecting homeowners and homeownership, and empowering homeowners to make their voices heard by state and federal officials.
Visit our web site http://www.americanhomeowners.org.
- by benjaminstraight August 7, 2008 2:47 PM PDT
- Privacy on the web will be the most debated issue of the first part of this millenium
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(8 Comments)