Version: 2008

Comments on: Companies urged to switch PCs off

Computers left on overnight for no good reason are costing U.K. companies millions of pounds every year.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (16 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
or at least
by volterwd October 24, 2005 9:23 AM PDT
put it into power saving mode...

in fact im suprised the company doesnt care that money is being thrown out like this
Reply to this comment
or at least
by volterwd October 24, 2005 9:23 AM PDT
put it into power saving mode...

in fact im suprised the company doesnt care that money is being thrown out like this
Reply to this comment
Unlikely
by October 24, 2005 10:20 AM PDT
Until businesses figure out how to spend enough money to get all company computers up to current standards, this isn't going to happen. Many companies do administrative work during off-hours when the user isn't at his desk. But the desktop terminals are too antiquated to do this during the day, because it slows the business systems to a crawl. Have a nice energy-saving day!
Reply to this comment
Unlikely
by October 24, 2005 10:20 AM PDT
Until businesses figure out how to spend enough money to get all company computers up to current standards, this isn't going to happen. Many companies do administrative work during off-hours when the user isn't at his desk. But the desktop terminals are too antiquated to do this during the day, because it slows the business systems to a crawl. Have a nice energy-saving day!
Reply to this comment
Microsoft can make this happen!!
by PeterDak October 24, 2005 10:55 AM PDT
There was a product 15 yrs ago that tried to support "instant on" -- so that you could start up within about a minute, all apps & windows just as you left them. The appl. wrote your PC's state to a file that is then loaded back in on reboot. For <some> reason the company didn't take off...might have been for Macs anyway.

I don't shut down all week because I have 15+ windows open. This would be a big headache to re-create each morning -- it represents my state of thought. MS could fix this by implementing such an application to store a PC's state...
Reply to this comment
Indeed
by MikeURL October 24, 2005 11:12 AM PDT
Instant on would surely give people more of an incentive to power down. As it is it can take 15 minutes to powerdown (as my documents synchronizes with the server) and we all know how long Windows takes to boot. I'd be looking at 1/2 hour a day just to turn the computer on and off.

I DO have the monitor set to power down after an hour because there is just no sense in leaving it on. I'm wary of standby because of how often Windows systems crash when recovering from standby.
Already there
by catchall October 24, 2005 12:36 PM PDT
It is called hibernate. It writes the contents of RAM to a disk image, then powers down. On restart, it loads the image.
I use it on my laptop, and my Win2K servers support it( though I don't use it there).
It is not 'instant', but quick, and everything is where you left it.
Microsoft can make this happen!!
by PeterDak October 24, 2005 10:55 AM PDT
There was a product 15 yrs ago that tried to support "instant on" -- so that you could start up within about a minute, all apps & windows just as you left them. The appl. wrote your PC's state to a file that is then loaded back in on reboot. For <some> reason the company didn't take off...might have been for Macs anyway.

I don't shut down all week because I have 15+ windows open. This would be a big headache to re-create each morning -- it represents my state of thought. MS could fix this by implementing such an application to store a PC's state...
Reply to this comment
Indeed
by MikeURL October 24, 2005 11:12 AM PDT
Instant on would surely give people more of an incentive to power down. As it is it can take 15 minutes to powerdown (as my documents synchronizes with the server) and we all know how long Windows takes to boot. I'd be looking at 1/2 hour a day just to turn the computer on and off.

I DO have the monitor set to power down after an hour because there is just no sense in leaving it on. I'm wary of standby because of how often Windows systems crash when recovering from standby.
Already there
by catchall October 24, 2005 12:36 PM PDT
It is called hibernate. It writes the contents of RAM to a disk image, then powers down. On restart, it loads the image.
I use it on my laptop, and my Win2K servers support it( though I don't use it there).
It is not 'instant', but quick, and everything is where you left it.
Hmm
by simcity1976 October 24, 2005 11:13 AM PDT
So is this article saying you loss weight or gain weight if you leave your computer on???

;P
Reply to this comment
Hmm
by simcity1976 October 24, 2005 11:13 AM PDT
So is this article saying you loss weight or gain weight if you leave your computer on???

;P
Reply to this comment
Many available solutions
by pdegens October 24, 2005 11:40 AM PDT
There are many available solutions to PC power management. Examples of this are:
Verdiem provides Surveyor software that offers flexible control of power management on networked computers.
US Environmental Protection Agency's EZSave software also provides PC power management for networked computers.
Both of these have been installed on thousands of PCs and have resulted in verified energy savings.
Reply to this comment
Many available solutions
by pdegens October 24, 2005 11:40 AM PDT
There are many available solutions to PC power management. Examples of this are:
Verdiem provides Surveyor software that offers flexible control of power management on networked computers.
US Environmental Protection Agency's EZSave software also provides PC power management for networked computers.
Both of these have been installed on thousands of PCs and have resulted in verified energy savings.
Reply to this comment
Does this added bit of info help anyone?
by vox365 October 25, 2005 6:45 AM PDT
I computed my electric bills for the past 2 years, then compared wattage consumption to the servers, computers and peripherals (by their listed wattage) I had running both 24/7 and those shut down nightly... computers, monitors, printers, routers, modems, etc.

Using basic math I now know:

- My costs are about $1.00 per watt for the electricity to operate any single electrical device 24/7/365.

This is based on general electricity rates as of Oct.1, 2005, so add on your local percentage increase rate when appropriate. Now it's easy to determine your savings per device by it's on/off schedule per day/month/year.

- Therefore, it costs $200 annually to leave a 200 watt computer turned on 24/7/365.
- And it costs roughly $100 to leave a 100 watt light bulb turned on 24/7/365.

Why is this important to know? Because we're being told the cost of fuel will be rising dramatically in the immediate future, and the generating of electricity is another major source of consumption to be passed on to the consumer. No more bargain rates.

And as far as the argument for diminished product lifespan for frequent on/off procedures - Not with our current reliable devices - another urban tale bites the dust.
Reply to this comment
Does this added bit of info help anyone?
by vox365 October 25, 2005 6:45 AM PDT
I computed my electric bills for the past 2 years, then compared wattage consumption to the servers, computers and peripherals (by their listed wattage) I had running both 24/7 and those shut down nightly... computers, monitors, printers, routers, modems, etc.

Using basic math I now know:

- My costs are about $1.00 per watt for the electricity to operate any single electrical device 24/7/365.

This is based on general electricity rates as of Oct.1, 2005, so add on your local percentage increase rate when appropriate. Now it's easy to determine your savings per device by it's on/off schedule per day/month/year.

- Therefore, it costs $200 annually to leave a 200 watt computer turned on 24/7/365.
- And it costs roughly $100 to leave a 100 watt light bulb turned on 24/7/365.

Why is this important to know? Because we're being told the cost of fuel will be rising dramatically in the immediate future, and the generating of electricity is another major source of consumption to be passed on to the consumer. No more bargain rates.

And as far as the argument for diminished product lifespan for frequent on/off procedures - Not with our current reliable devices - another urban tale bites the dust.
Reply to this comment
(16 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

Latest tech news headlines

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.

More feeds available in our RSS feed index.

advertisement