Comments on: Running the numbers on Vista
Over its first six months, the latest Windows version can't hold a candle to XP. But, Office sales rock, according to NPD report.
Over its first six months, the latest Windows version can't hold a candle to XP. But, Office sales rock, according to NPD report.
January 4, 2010 5:54 PM PST
January 4, 2010 4:38 PM PST
January 4, 2010 4:28 PM PST
Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Related quotes
The support for XP drivers has been ridiculous on these new machines, especially for my Sony Vaio laptop, though I did finally get it working after two days of searching and hacking at it. It's almost as if Microsoft is abandoning XP and trying to force us to move to Vista, which many company's simply cant do since the software that runs our businesses simply doesnt work on Vista.
Sounds to me more like Sony giving up on XP more than MS. Particularily considering that MS is still ofering support for XP which includes driver changes updates and patches. However, it is not MS responsibility to make sure that every piece of new laptop hardware works with XP, that would be upto the ones making the hardware. ie Sony
Umm.. I don't know where you got that but FYI, there's a Service Pack 3 coming for Windows XP. Some people are just so reckless when their opinions, sigh...
They're losing market share at wholesale rates. Perhaps if they offered those same rates to individuals, it would help?
I switched, and I've taken like 10 people with me and counting. Money is not an object when it never gets involved in the first place.
the staff that get to 'pick' their laptop, although they have to
wait for their 'turn' in the budget, have selected Mac laptops. I'm
somewhat surprised, but only somewhat. In the mid-level
laptop market, prices are pretty much the same for a Mac or PC
laptop. Vista is touted as being more secure, but it's not
escaped at least 50% of the potential market that it's only more
secure because it is constantly being exploited and has to come
out with faster security fixes weekly. We fully expect that
somewhere the Mac may be as susceptible, so we preach non-
complacency; but the fact is, for now, they are much easier to
manage from a security aspect. So the statistics of Vista being
so secure is really just an indication that they have a bigger and
more active 'brute squad' whereas the smaller players, Linux
and Mac OS, don't need that big and resource hungry a squad
of brutes to protect them. At least for now.
http://wine-review.blogspot.com/
A relative recently bought a Dell Desktop & Laptop with MS Vista. All new software and no loading of the old stuff.
All worked well on the Desktop except the existing cable internet connection. No problem, call the cable company and in about an hour it's decided that they have to address their modem to make it compatable with Vista. So they do, and it works.
Not so easy. Move the cable connection to the laptop and quess what NG. Call the cable company, re-address the modem and it works.
Not so easy. Move the connection back to the desktop and NG. and so forth (etc.).
The question is, should the cable/dsl etc., companies be required to upgrade their modems to be compatable with a new OS (Vista) or visa versa?
With an ISP I should be able to hook up any OS I want and have no connection issues let alone have to call the ISP to get things to work.
Vista: 6.26%
Mac: 3.33%
http://marketshare.hitslink.com/report.aspx?qprid=5
Doesn't sound like much, does it? Well, until you realize that combined Windows marketshare has actually dropped in your cite overall.
From the looks of Vista, they failed miserably on all counts. What's with the hideous standard blue and yellow-green background? Is there anybody out there that actually thinks that looks appealing? If you're going to outdo the masters, you better to it right. For instance, take a look at the Vista window transparency. It's lame. Looks like something a novice that just discovered alpha channels in photoshop would do. Yuck. Then again, money doesn't buy taste, or good interface designers.
So, you're left with this fluff while all the potentially useful enhancements, like a new filesystem, are tossed out with the wash.
The new graphics engine in Vista isn't in all about Aero (which I love, by the way). Vista has WPF (Windows Presentation Foundation), it's a runtime environment for graphics that is programmable through .NET.
[i]"It provides a consistent programming model for building applications and provides a clear separation between the UI and the business logic" [/i] - Wikipedia
Imagine doing savvy apps for the operating system without making API calls. Isn't that a breeze? WPF is more than just skin deep, you know.
Vista has some compatibility issues with older software but this problem can be overcome if you ID the incompatible software and revert the system to a previous OS to run it. The driver problems seem to have been mostly solved by a number of updates the first few months after the OS was released.
Vista has some advanced features that are well above those available for XP. This does not include the UAC that I have disabled. Vista does have one problem that may not be overcome, navigation. This system is much more difficult to maneuver within and several long standing names have been changed, ("add/remove programs" is now "programs and features",) this adds to the problem. I'm still having one problem with the OS. The toolbar in windows explorer will crash occasional but it can simply be restarted and on your way again. If this and other problems are reported, I'm sure they will be straightened out with the release of Vista SP1.
PC prices have climbed about $75.00 in our area over the last nine months, more then likely because of the extra 1 GB of RAM being added. This is in addition to the 1 GB of RAM that came with PCs sold around New Years 2007. For a total of 2 GBs.
I still think with a little more time this will be a very good OS and a winner for Microsoft. Vista is just a little slow out of the starting gate in a race that is a marathon not a sprint.
Way to go, Microsoft,... just another way to tick off your customers. They also just lost my interest in getting an Xbox... any time I sense that someone is trying to force my choice, I usually reflexively dig in my heels... and I am by no means alone in this reaction.
I will just have to add the lack of game port support to my growing list of "why I am becoming disenchanted with Microsoft".
Now at what seems every twist and turn, visiting Microsoft's download center requires WGA, over and over again. Then after downloading, validate Media Player, or validate Internet Explorer. Vista to me is a summation of all the new and very annoying, sometimes suspect, behavior of Microsoft. Product Activation, WGA, WGA-N, UAC popups, Windows Defender's silent driver revocation, and now it seems silent downloads, I think Microsoft has really ticked a lot of people off and if the numbers are correct, we're seeing the reaction.
We will do everything in our power to avoid that program for as long as possible. And our IT guy will help us do that.
Starthrower PDX
- Windows Vista is a dog!
- by Fake Donald Trump September 17, 2007 8:04 AM PDT
- I had to fire my Windows Vista:
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
Showing 2 of 2 pages (121 Comments)http://fakedonaldtrump.blogspot.com/2007/09/windows-vista-youre-fired.html
I predict that Microsoft will lose a lot of money from this dog, with possible lawsuits from Vista owners.