Comments on: Next version of Windows: Call it 7
Microsoft is planning to ship its next major version of Windows--known internally as version "7"--within roughly three years, CNET News.com has learned.
Microsoft is planning to ship its next major version of Windows--known internally as version "7"--within roughly three years, CNET News.com has learned.
January 1, 2010 9:20 AM PST
January 1, 2010 7:31 AM PST
January 1, 2010 4:00 AM PST
Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Related quotes
There was no compelling reason to rush to upgrade your corporate network clients from Win2K to XP, esp if you had the perimeter secured with firewall, antivirus, spam and central workstation management. There has been no compelling reasons to upgrade Office ever since Office 97. Microsoft knows this, but like a good monopoly, they use their dominant market position to secure your revenue upfront, without showing you any potential value.
Say NO to Software Assurance! Teach Microsoft to earn money the old fashioned way... by showing us the value of upgrading their products.
1. Click Start
2. Click Run...
3. Type "winver", and hit OK
You would see that XP is Version 5.1 *******.
the boss just upgraded to Vista. What a complete joke.
The name is because more than just being expediend or working a vista It can habor technology well for the developments in the future infastruction of computing application and allow the user to take advantage as it unfolds.
then the one after that the next one can be a little longer in the waiting while every one is getting fully developed in the expanses of what will be capable.
The name for that windows
Windows Rapture
Oh well at least i had a go
...carry the 3....
.....2037?
CONFOUND THEM WITH YOUR BULL"
this is today's ethos.
If thats true then EMF shielding would solve it yet i've had much trouble obtaining it.
I don't care how much that industry is the possible loss there is to that industry being fair ain't worth as much as my life exsistance.
Go on deny it now!
Apple owns the lions share of the "other" or non MS operating systems -- Besides, Linux is UNIX anyway and I sure am tired of listening to the shrills out there clammering how original Linux is -- It's just an open source version of UNIX that will not make a real dent in the market for quite some time.
Wanna get something really done and communicate in the business world -- Looks like Windows will dominate (realisically) for quite some time. Want to use a premium system, use Apple hardware and software, want to use the fringe, use the open sorce UNIX called Linux and really see where that really gets you... (Not very far).
As for the Linux Canaries breaking wind in the hurrican of reality -- Careful not to blow out your ***** too much. =;o)
together it's next unstable, bloated, aging and most overhyped
product of all time - Windows, version 7 within 3 years.
Whenever it gets here, it will still probably be about 10 years
behind Mac OS X.
I feel really bad for anyone who is still brianwashed or just too
stubborn to give the Macintosh a fair run, because it really is a
far superior machine in so many ways, there really is no
argument.
Every time I have to sit down on a Windows machine, I am
constantly reminded of why I choose to use Apple products and
have continued to do so for the past 12 years.
Go ahead and keep using your Windows, it helps people make
lots of money when they have to repair and troubleshoot your
equipment. I'll stick with Apple.
http://www.pisceandelusions.org
You almost had me, I was like man, he is serious, then I saw the part about Microsoft people being brainwashed and then I knew you had to be joking!!!
Apple people are are the epitome of brainwashed... you guys are like a fashion cult with over priced tech gear.
I often recommend Macs to family members and friends because I do think that they're easier to use for many people to use and keep secure, but the Mac interface doesn't resonate with me and the hardware, while nicely designed, offers limited choice.
If you really think that there are no smart, experienced, computer literate people who simply prefer to use Windows because they like it better, you are blind and arrogant. If Macs were so obviously superior, they would have more market share than they do. Wake up.
-Mister Winky
The OS kernel of Microsoft is really really more technologically powerfull than the MacOS X Kernel... And not just a little!!
10 years behind Mac OS X... We always see ignorant people telling that kind of stupidity!! Dop!! Microsoft have the must powerfull OS kernel on the maket actually since Windows NT 5...
When a company own 90% of the market this is surly because it do wrong!!!
A little sarcasm here...
Also ... I don't understand your point about troubleshooting equipement... Equipement is not the resposability of Microsoft!! This is true that MacOX hardware is of best quality but ... Microsoft Windows have to deal with a bunch of esolteric hardware brand and it do well!! This is not the responsibility of the Windows OS if people put cheap hardware on their machine that cause hardware isue...
Also this is ot really the responsability of Microsoft if the hardware companies do bad device driver...
HO yeah ... Apple have not these problems...
If you try to install a legacy hardware on your Mac what will append? ... Ho ... it will not work Ho... If you decide to buy a special hardware to manage somthing on your Mac and ... Ho it will not work or you will have to write your own device driver... Ho ... hmmm but it will work on my windows XP/Vista machine...
You can try to hit the head of microsoft... Try to destroy the reputation of their OS ... but the fact is microsoft own 90% of the OS market because their OS are the most powerfull on the market and the most accessible on the market.... But you are right... The graphical user interface of the Mac OS X is cute...
So M$ will surely continue their copying the MacOS game by
coming out with Windows X.
In other terms, if the OS is based on any State of Persistent Memory rather than being Reliant on Excellent Imagination, it will not be good enough.... for such are the Current development fields for Future Mobilised and Mobilising HPC Needs and Feeds.
Would Microsoft like to deny that Publicly ..... or can they confirm IT with further clarification and explanation?
Did you hear them? Probably not.
Sad isn't it. A company rich with so much potental.
It was always about a TOOL, not a branding.
I learned it from a Wall Street banking brander Asian-American
working for a real HUGE world wide banking emporium.
It is BRANDING..., the business model is about branding.
And branding and quality are divorced in the progression of
American socio-cultural values.
I would put my head on the pike if the American Nazi Party
headquarter computers would be using Apple PC's or....even
better, regular cloney PC's with Linux/GNU OS. That would not be
the right-wing SUPER AMERICAN branding that the neo-nazis
here need. They need Windows, OF COURSE !!! and if I could
sneak in their headquarters, that is what I would find.
Sooo, GIVE ME WINDOWS OR GIVE ME DEATH !!!
(an american patriot)
A pat on the back, that is all MS got for being such nice boyz
after the review of their Anti-Trust case that lasted 5 long years
and was resolved THEY ARE A MONOPOLY WITHOUT A DOUBT...
keep it up boyz~~~
The pat happened in Bush's gov't but it could have happened in
our next president's gov't - Mrs. Clinton.
It is all in the SYSTEM. built-in like with computers
other than Final Cut, it was worthless. Regretted the purchase the first hour I got it. Say bye to the backspace key - copying files over files in another folder (appending) OSX has never heard of it. Windows is't perfect, but it gets the job done.
NEW CODE.
Get your MS history corrected before you infuriate your not so
stupid audience with your idiotic remarks.
If you're a Mac user then go play with your Mac and try to find something usefull to do with it, same goes for you Linux users. Otherwise, every time some Mac/Linux fanboy user interjects some retorica comments into a discussion thread about Windows it only proves how insecure those idiots are about their bad choice in operating systems. If those OS'es were so great they wouldn't have to spent half their time trolling the web trying to prove it.
For goodness sake, then how could what?s-his-name maintain his 400 ft (or so) luxury super-yacht.
Of course, out of these, only #1 is likely. #2 is politically as likely as pigs flying, while #3 would require removing or at least disabling certain features by default.
More likely, the DRM will be extended to control more hardware and prevent unapproved software packages from running without popping up a lot of warnings. They'll add more features, gobbling up more RAM.
Personally, I think Windows XP is the best Microsoft OS there is. Even when it first came out, it ran pretty well with existing applications.
7 needs to be everything Vista was SUPPOSED to be but wasn't AND MORE. Microsoft needs to show the world they're committed to innovating, not just building on yesterday's technology (which is what every Windows except NT has been to date). If not, it's nothing less than more empty promises and pseudo-vaporware from Redmond.
IT SUCKED. Now i have a Apple iMac I WILL NEVER GO BACK TO
MICROSOFT IN A MILLION YEARS UNLESS THEY MAKE THE BEST
UPGRADE BETTER THEN XP
- the quality bar
- by West11 October 6, 2007 11:29 PM PDT
- the thieves at Microsoft haven't hit the bar for '98, 2000, ME(millions of errors), XP or Vista. As matter of fact they gotten less close on each attempt except Me, which didn't meet any standards--not unacceptable. Can we depend on their promise not release 7 until it hits the bar? If so, then there will not be any new MS OS in the future because based on their track record they've consistently failed.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
Showing 2 of 3 pages (203 Comments)