Comments on: Gates: 40 million Vista copies sold
During WinHEC keynote, Microsoft chairman also announces several new partners for its Windows Home Server product, including Gateway and Medion.
During WinHEC keynote, Microsoft chairman also announces several new partners for its Windows Home Server product, including Gateway and Medion.
January 5, 2010 11:10 AM PST
January 5, 2010 10:50 AM PST
January 5, 2010 10:27 AM PST
Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Related quotes
properly after the install was insanely complex. Now, on a PC it
might be easier, but on my laptop, it was absolute hell. It
wouldn't even recognize my built-in ethernet.
On the other hand, an install of Windows generally will come
right up with all of your built in hardware working (for the most
part). I don't expect Linux to recognize everything in my system
(like my Wi-fi card out of my router), or the exact kind of video
card, but I would expect it to do a decent job of being able to
set up a simple ethernet controller.
using Linux after a couple weeks, unless all you do on your
machine is surf the internet (if you can find drivers that work)
and create office documents.
It's easy to say, "I'm using Linux now," but it's much harder to
say that you have Linux installed, and use it regularly. Linux is
an enthusiast OS, run by people that want to be completely
involved in working ON their computer, instead of the majority
that wants to USE their computer. Until Linux has a user friendly
setup procedure, file system structure, and drivers that actually
will work and don't require a terminal window to install new
ones, Linux will be sitting on the sideline.
This 'war' has raging for years, and Linux is still where it was.
Don't quote download numbers in reply, because those numbers
don't mean crap. Anything that is free to download and use,
people will try, but the majority of them are probably turning
their heads away in disgust when they realize nothing on their
computer works any more.
But then again, I suspect a lot of "sales" are corporations that are buying Vista licenses but installing XP. Most are waiting until at least SP1 before rolling it out in any numbers.
In a way I feel sorry for MS. It's got to be hard to spend 5+ years developing an operating system that has been such a big disappointment, even for hard core MS fans.
And if the yet unannounced features in Apple's OS X turn out to be as revolutionary as some think (wish? hope?) Vista is going to be an even bigger disappointment.
I doubt any corporations are doing this. If they already have a corporate license for XP, why would they waste their money on a vista license just to not use it? I don't think corporations are in the money of giving MS $ now so they can use the licenses later. That doesn't make sense.
Why are some of you people intent on coming up with insane arguments that make no sense to invalidate the numbers? Just give it up, already.
From what I have heard from the real world people.Many have
bought Vista but they wished they had not.
But good on you for milking the cow while you can. But I have to inform you that people really do not care about the OS anymore. The interest is the browser and what services and sites you access. That is where true innovation is happening.
We usually lose internet about once a day, between one thing and another. (No, changing ISPs would not fix the problem. There's only one carrier out of town, unless we go satellite.)
I have used Vista (beta versions), and didn't like it either. Not because of compatibility issues. It ran slowly, and, because I am a 'power user', I found that its ties to other Microsoft products, like Internet Explorer, and Live.com, were too much. Thus, I did not buy it. I like XP.
My friends, though, are not power users. Not even close. And they still find it annoying.
I have used Windows PCs for most of my life, with the exception of my first personal computer, a 1987 Mac. And I really like them, and they have advanced immensely. But I'm sticking to 2000 and XP.
As for those looking for a new computer, I suggest an iMac.
I'm running Vista on my MacBook Pro without any problem. But
I'm just not seeing any great difference between a themed-out
XP and Vista, especially in functionality.
Yeah, I think it looks better (but it's only in comparison to XP)
but I'm not seeing any productivity gains over XP or, especially,
when I compare it to OS X.
I get really tired of little pop-up windows coming up all the time
in Windows and IE fighting Firefox to be my default browser.
It really is the showdown of de facto and de jeure standards. I
have to be acquainted with Windows in the computing world,
but, outside of a games or a quantity vs. quality software
availability argument, I haven't seen anything compelling to
recommend Windows over OS X.
And Vista is not the quantum leap that XP was. Or OS X.
Old trick of the Jackson 5 and then solo Michael Jackson was to advertise that every seat was sold(to a dummy business) and then only 10% buy tickets- The ads were used to appeal to those who thought they were part of something big. Same here- Gates is appealing to those who would want to buy a pc w/vista because there are "40 million Vista copies sold"!!!!
I have a hard time believing that 40 million copies sold (which happens to include new PCs where you don't usually have a choice but to pay the Windows tax) could be hardly considered "a success". Heck.. I'm not even sure they turned a profit yet considering, even at 40M, they still spent nearly $225 per installation creating the product.
Technically, they may have sold 40M copies of Vista, but that is far from the true picture of how many copies are really being used or how many are retail vs OEM bundles.
First off, these figures include all the Express Upgrades from last fall's XP shipments -- and, based on almost everyone I know who got one, most of these are sitting on shelves awaiting Vista SP1 before they will even be attempted.
Secondly, these sales figures include sales of Vista Business -- which qualifies for downgrade rights to a Windows XP Professional License. Every business I deal with right now is simply ordering Vista Business because there is no reason not to. They are then promptly imaging their standard Windows XP Pro rollout onto these machines. Based on my own experience, if more than 1 copy in 10 of Vista Business sold has so far been used for anything except XP Pro downgrade rights, I would be very surprised.
Furthermore, as an IT rep, I've so far had 4 people PAY me to wipe the copies of Vista that came on their new machine and re-install XP for them.
What would be a much more interesting figure to see is how many copies of Vista have actually phoned home to the MS Activation servers and are actually being used as Vista -- you can be sure this number is a LOT less than 40M. Quite frankly, if it is even half that I'd be surprised.
XP vs VISTA: I have been using vista ultimate since first beta release. Of course I keep my xp pro next to it. If i had to choose between xp and vista i would choose xp in blink of an eye.
Just my two cent
Well you ppl should stop saying who is more stupid using what,but start saying that what you ppl like and keep with it because,by saying windows users are stupid i guess nothing is going to change.And even if even you says microsoft is a copy cat i still see nth that worries the users of it.
And more than 50% ppl who uses mac is also running windows in it...
http://marketshare.hitslink.com/report.aspx?qprid=2
Windows XP
Windows 2000
Mac OS
Windows Vista
Mac Intel
Win 98
Other
Who really bought Vista?
when compared to PCI-E or a current AGP. I think Vista sets your
rating based on the lowest point in your hardware. So, if your PCI
Video card is the slowest point, it might make your rating drop.
I would remove that card, run the performance test again and see
what you end up with.
Now....
Lets discuss the 40 million "very happy" Vista users... Ummm minus one, which is me that is!
Who can forget when an IBM PC shipped with a menu of operating systems available? MSFT worked hard to wipe out that choice with the manufacturers making 'sales numbers' a sick joke.
What is probably happening is relative to the adoption curve of XP at introduction is that Vista shipments are completely stalled out and people are now actively choosing XP and vocally rejecting Vista.
- But..
- by Lex Man May 16, 2007 8:18 AM PDT
- It's still a copy of XP sold, if you buy a laptop with Vista pre installed and then put Linux on it, Microsoft have still earned money.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
Showing 2 of 3 pages (155 Comments)