Comments on: Limited choices for Windows XP holdouts

If you're hesitant about making the leap to Windows Vista, expect a hassle trying to find an XP computer on store shelves.

[adasha76]

Straight answer

"I don't really know why somebody would buy a Vista Basic system, unless you're a real basic user," he said.

How about because I refuse to pay such an extortionate amount of money for an OS just because it looks nicer and has a few features I'm either not interested in or already have using 3rd party software?

[Dragon Forge]

Scare tactics article

There are a myriad of sources available t you to pick up an xp system!!!

LOL ! ! ! And "if your system dies tomorrow" the license does not die with it, the hardware is replaceable,... WHAT MALARKY is this but scare mongering tactics but an industry desparate to confuse the consumer.

Imagine for a second that you are being obviously and blatantly manipulated - HOW DOES THAT MAKE YOU FEEL!?!?!

Smart money is on the "no rush no - worries" theology, and it should be, everything is fixable or replaceable.

Articles have been out for months about the BS hype of vista's so called better security system. HA!HA!HA! LOL do you really beleive it!?!? No one elase does.

And for games!??? has a long way to go before they prove to the gaming market they can make it fly.

I hate to think crap is getting rammed down the consumer's throat

[ddesy]

Not so fast!

The average user is going to look in a store for a replacement if their PC dies, and I have seen very few XP systems left in any stores. Most stores have none left. Sure, they could buy one online, but it their computer is dead how will they do it?

Also, if your PC came with an OEM copy of Windows, then your license does actually die with the hardware. Fair or not, that's how it is.

This isn't scare tactics, it's the harsh truth. An unpolished OS is being forced on consumers. I have a Vista system in place for testing at my workplace, and much of the software that we depend on runs poorly or not at all on it!

[Dragon Forge]

Do you think for a second that windows has gottten it right yet???

I was there when DOS 5 & 6 were released so have had to endure every single bit of marketing hyperbola, subterfuge and rhetoric from microlimp about their "stability" and "security".

Promises, promises, promises. You think it is going to be any more safe, secure or stable?????

What isn't already poorly done with preplanned obsolescence in mind is being actively brought down by those focused on testing the real capabilities and capacities of windows security

[Lindy01]

Totally lame article

Most corporations load their own builds on new PC's either when they come in or they pay Dell and HP to do it for them. They buy licenses not software copies. Vista probably gets blown away way more for a corporate XP install than it gets left on a new box coming in. Even small businesses buy 5 or 10 copies of XP Pro and get 1 disk and the licenses to install it on their PC?s.

For home users well???.is this any different than when XP came out???? No its not, does Mac allow you buy a new PC with the last version of its OS???NO they don?t.

Anyone that has been in the PC world for the last 5 years knew this was going to happen.

Why is this even an article?

[ddesy]

At least..

At least Mac OS doesn't change as radically from one version to the next as Windows does!

And this is an article because Vista isn't ready for prime time! Trust me, I've been testing Vista Ultimate with software that my company depends on!

[Far Star]

Article is off but so are you.

True that a business will be able to side step the Vista issue if they have a half decent IT guy/crew.

Not true is the backhand at Macs. They are all coming with 10.4 which IS the latest. Leopard is not out yet so that is a moot point.

[Penguinisto]

If a MSFT astroturfer whines in the forest and no one hears it...

...do they really say anything important?

Ah well. The article focused primarily on retail buyers (small businesses, home users... folks who actually would go to Circuit City as opposed to Newegg to buy new machines). And yeah, the home user is basically screwed if they take the retail store route.

Does Mac come w/ the last version of their OS? Depends on when the machine is sold. IIRC, when 10.4 came out, you could (for awhile) choose between 10.3.9 and 10.4 when 10.4 first came out.

But, taht wasn't really the point, since Apple compatibility issues are few and far between, and hardware upgrades of Macs are on far longer cycles (PC's usually get replaced every 3-4 years, while Macs can usually stay in situ for 5 years or more).

Many businesses have totally different setups, but there is still one bump in the road: how much longer will XP drivers be available for specific hardware (video cards, peripherals, etc)?

/P

[Thomas, David]

Re:

Apple doesn't recall their computers from vendors for the
purpose of forcing users to buy their latest system.

Apple owns, and controls their hardware solution, and does not
infringe on anyone elses business solutions to force their
providers to sell ONLY their latest OS (by the way, one can easily
argue that's because they have no such providers ... irony)

The article isn't lame, it's just shining a little light of truth.

[extinctone]

Totally lame Microsoft shill

We all know you're blindly pro-microsoft. Give it a rest.

[bluemist9999]

I'd upgrade from XP to a Mac

Even though I've never used a Mac, if I had to buy a new PC, and had a choice of either:

1) Upgrading to a new high-end PC and watching Vista grind it to a halt and force new DRM crap on me
or
2) Upgrading to a Mac (which from what I've heard runs faster than Windows)

I'd take the latter. I've never used a Mac, but it sounds like the less painful option.

I'd use some dual boot or virtualization software to run a copy of Windows XP as needed on the Mac.

If Microsoft got rid of the DRM "enhancements" and toned down the extra GUI showoff features, so it ran well on a regular PC, I'd consider upgrading to it.

[ddesy]

In all fairness...

I admit that I am a Mac lover, but when it comes to speed Macs don't really have an advantage over Windows PCs. At this point their share most of the same hardware, so the main difference is the OS itself. For some things Mac OS X is faster, for some Windows is faster (well, at least XP, that is).

At this point, at home I mainly run Mac OS X for my primary OS and Windows 2000 is my secondary inside a Parallels virtual machine. I have found that this mix is suitable for anything but graphically intense Windows software. For that, there is always the option of running Windows XP via Boot Camp.

[gary85739]

Mac Leopard OS out soon!

When Leopard arrives, I'll get an iMac!

[0taka0]

i agree sort of

os X is much better than vista and looks about as cool...with the boot camp software you can play games/apps. that used to force you to buy windows

the only problem is that you don't really have an option of upgrading your video card past the one apple gives you (which is decent)

no SLI or crossfire, probably no DX10 for a year or so

also, mac is more expensive than windows with the same parts

[dmeriwether]

Vista/XP and Charity license for client seats

In the middle of an upgrade, we learned the hard way that MS
has ceased charity license for XP Pro completely. Must buy Vista
at $72.00 a client seat instead of XP Pro at $8 a seat - a major
hit on the budgets of most charities. (Come on, Bill, can't the
Foundation subsidize some here?) Of course, they allow the
charity to install XP Pro under the Vista seat license, with the
purchase of the media disk. How all this goes in reality we have
yet to see, and our IT is dubious about the smooth install. Will
XPro recognize the Vista codes, etc. But what choice is there? We
are afraid to call back and ask if the same marketing models
apply to charity licences for Office. That would be a slap on both
cheeks - or more accurately a one-two punch to non-profit
budgets already staggered by real needs.

[Que.Ball]

RE: Vista/XP and Charity license for client seats

Charity open licenses have stayed the same price between XP Pro and Vista. Not sure where you were getting it for $8 but it's always been around the same price. I'm going to assume the $8 price was something outside of the charity open license program or perhaps not for the Pro version but maybe a home edition, or some charity oem program I haven't seen.

When you purchase a license under the charity open license program you get 3 license numbers. 1 for Windows XP Pro 32bit 1 for XP Pro 64bit and 1 for Vista Business edition. If you have purchased open licenses in the past when Windows 2000 was still supported then you can purchase new Vista licenses and install your old Windows 2000 Pro volume license key if you want.

The reason they stop selling the Windows XP license when the new version came out is that the license agreement specifically allows you downgrade rights to previous versions under these volume license programs. There is no reason to purchase an older license because the new license includes access to the old version in volume licensing.

[gggg sssss]

eight dollars

Wow. We are paying 92 Canadian. Who do you hav eto sleep with to get $8

[BruceLawrence]

Consumers share responsiblity

I have numerous issues with this artible excpet on the business side of it.

The corporation I work for won't be going to Vista anytime in the next fiscal year. It will probably be FY09. This is due to getting the best TOC from our existing desktops and software compatibility. I'm sure this is typical accross most corporations.

Consumers on the other hand... In Microsofts 'defense' they simply cannot and should not continue to support Mom's 9 year old Kodak software. Or Printshop deluxe from 1999.

Consumers have to face the hardened facts. At SOME point in time they're going to have to upgrade software. While I understand that not all software is compatible, its not entirely Microsofts fault. The software vendor has to create compabtible versions and the dev network has had their hands on Vista for quite some time.

Companies like Microsoft have to move forward for obvious reasons. Vista is a move in that direction and if you don't get the glassy nice look because you can't spend an extra $200 on a faster system then sorry.

I don't care what that article says or what these "experts" like the Symantec CEO says (yeah he doesn't have alternative motives does he), people see Vista and they want it. They use Vista and are very impressed by it. Its a good OS and brings a slew of new features and capabilities that XP couldn't provide. So you gotta buy faster hardware. Since when was that a bad thing? You get more life out of the system and the experience is better!

One example of why a faster system is required is when you're watching a video in Media Center in Vista, you can shrink the movie down, move it to the side and continue working. Not only that, when you switch between your programs and sift through the windows like a rolodex, the movie is still playing! Works flawlessly.

My advice: Put your money down and get a good computer. You will be happier. No, I'm not a reseller and don't work for Microsoft. I'm an IT guy with some common sense.

[BruceLawrence]

Sorry for typos

Few typos in that first sentence. Looked bad but I'm in a hurry today :)

[Bob H in NPR]

extra $200 . . .

Tell you what. Why don't you shrink your income down to less then 15 to 20 grand a year - better yet, how about less? Then see how many extra 2 Franklins you have, much less the cost of a high end machine.

There are a hell of a lot of us out here, both small charities & individual users, who buy used machines when the old one dies simply because we do not have the "extra" to buy a new one. Or we buy the $300 variety, which can't use Vista anyway. We use free open source security, which works very well for us. We don't need or want all the bells & whistles. When MS drives us out of the market, watch your revenue from Net advertising decline.

I currently use Windows ME and open source security. The only problems I have had is when the browsers are hacked. I have never used Linux, but I can learn. After all, I had to learn Windows. Already, there are ways to get Vista & XP free, w/o getting caught. Sounds like a serious security breach to me. MS thinks they have a problem with piracy now. Wait a year & see how bad it gets. Wait a year & watch their market share goes down.

[Catmoves]

Of course you're not

"don't care what that article says or what these "experts" like the Symantec CEO says (yeah he doesn't have alternative motives does he)" I assume you mean "ulterior?" And, yes, Symantec does have money motives. No matter what I think of them (Yuk seems to fit) many, many people use their resource hoggers. Maybe I should get four g's of Ram if I want all this? Along with a new $300 graphics board? And whatever else this over priced OS wants me to have? Buddy, can you spare a dime?

[scktwstdfrk]

Another Windows first - a movie player which works flawlessly when you're NOT watching. Smoke, mirrors, bells, whistles.......nothing changes except the price of the upgraded requirement......

[Ted Miller]

It happened to me.

I went to BestBuy, Walmart, Circuit City, CompUSA and Staples just to name a few. Microsoft has apparantly twisted their arms with their strong arm tactics. I did not see a single XP computer on the shelves. I asked a worker if they had any XP computers in a Bargin area or something and he said there was one and was going to sell it to me for double the amount it was worth. I told him never mind and that I will buy a Vista machine. He said there where no more in stock. As a matter of fact in all the stores there where not many Vista computers to choose from. Staples only had two. Walmart only had Emachines and I really did not want them as a matter of fact the only had Vista Basic and one was on disply with a real awful and blurry picture. I ended up buying one in Best Buy. Just a note I went to one Best Buy and the sales person was to busy talking to her friends for over 15 minutes while we stood there. We walked out and went to another Best Buy. Two people lost a big sale and nobody cares. what is this world coming to? I have the Home premium Vista and found it not to friendly although the Utility bar was pretty cool. I am pretty good with computers and I am pretty sure I will get it to work, but I must say that I do feel sorry for all the people who have even a slight amount of difficulty with computers. I believe Vista is going to be a nightmare for them!

[eldernorm]

Why oh why?

Boy, you must really love Vista to go thru all that problem to get
one. Why oh why did you not consider getting 2 computers in one.
Get a Mac and with Boot Camp and XP and there you go.

Oh well. enjoy Vista, its DRM, its lack of drivers, and the obvious
loving care that everyone else that deals with it shows.

Elder Norm

[coachgeorge]

Why Change?

Lets see, I have 6 computers. Win2kserver, win2k3 server, XP Pro. They all work, they are all secure, they do what I need them to do. They are compatible with the software I use, I know them. Should a computer die, I will load the same operating system on the new computer that was on the old.
The only ones captured by the preloads on new computers are the non computer savvy. My hope is that there isn't enough of them to satisfy Microsoft's projections for Vista. I would like to see Vista be the new Windows ME.
Vista should have been a service pak upgrade to XP.

[clindhartsen]

Wasn't This Exactly What Happened With XP?

When the original release of XP happened, didn't all the retail stores largely remove any ME machines and auto-defacto sell XP machines. Honestly, though, the new OS runs well on my own PC, and it's roughly 4 years old and was a midrange model! Anyone saying "It'll slow it down" either hasn't used it or used it on something excessively low in power.

If anything, the new upgrade is definitely worth it, but if you want to still use XP, just go buy a copy and stop complaining!

[Royce]

98SE to XP

I cannot speak for retail stores, but I purchased a Dell desktop Dimension 4100 at least a year after the introduction of XP. I requested 98SE and Dell installed it with no questions. I subsequently purchased XP Pro and installed it myself, when I chose to.

Now, only IBM gives you that option, after really only a month of VISTA. I think many of us would like the system to become a little more stable before we are forced to acquire it. Why should we be MS's, or any other companies, guinea pigs? I am glad the system works well on your machine, but there are many other issues than how well it works on a particular machine, especially if one uses a large number of standard, but non-MS, software. I am aware that this is not Vista's "problem," but it can make a difference in timing decisions.

[ddesy]

It does slow it down!

I am running the Vista Ultimate on an Athlon64 3200+ with 1GB RAM and a GeForce FX 5200 video card. That computer was definitely faster running XP, no questions at all! Besides that, plenty of the software that my company depends on will not properly run on it.

The new upgrade is not worth it for anyone who values a decent computing experience. At least not until Microsoft can get Vista running like a non-beta OS!

[armchair99]

If You Want Choice...

Simply buy a vanilla box from a local PC store to replace the one that "died" and install any modern Linux Distro on it. You'll never need to worry about forced upgrades again.

[gary85739]

Linux on an older computer instead of...

buying a new computer with Vista,etc?

[cchenoweth6]

lol

this never stops. Talk about a confused customer.. throw some linux on their box.

[wilswong]

Go DIY

As usual, the Wintel PC conglomerate just push us to the edge of updating things that is not needed to be updated and to have things that is total crap (yes...crapware).

That's why the best way is to do it the DIY way. We have to learn sooner or later or else we are just ripe cherries for the picking.

[DStrong]

Of Course Symantec States security concerns!

Has anyone actually installed Vista and any Symantec product?? I have tired multiple times and each try I get the same error, "Symantec prodocuts are not compatible with Vista!". Mr. Thompson, you should be more concerned that your company has FAILED to deliver a product that works with Vista. Now that there is "Limited Choices" Symantec better do some better R&D and fast!

[ddesy]

What!?

I am running Symantec AntiVirus Corporate 10.2 on Vista with no problems. Well, unless you count the fact that Symantec AntiVirus itself is a resource hog.

[Bob H in NPR]

Scuse me...

...but after a lot of customer ******** & threats of litigation from companies with deep pockets (though not even close to having the pocket depth of MS), MS supposedly changed Vista to work with current security software. So much for their agreements. They are constantly in litigation with open source companies who have very shallow pockets over so called patent & copyright infringements. So much with working with open source. I is past time to break up the MS monopoly.

[thedreaming]

It's all about the money...

Microsoft's cash cows are Windows and Office. Microsoft udates these packages to kill bugs, add enhancements, and add new features. They also update the packages to support new hardware.

Now, as a side bonus, they use FUD to convince the consumer tha they need to buy Windows and Office (again) even though what they already have works well.

My XP runs fine and I use OpenOffice. Why do I need to run Vista and Office 2007?

Oh, because Mycrosoft wants to make more money? I'm sorry, that's not a good reason.

[rcrusoe]

Great choices for XP holdouts

Most of our business apps run in either a browser or a telnet screen, so the OS of our clients run really hasn't mattered for years. We've run Windows, for the most part, because the boxes were relatively cheap and XP has been reasonably secure and stable since SP2.

We have a few Windows only apps that some users need, but we've found that they don't run well in Vista. Since we'll have to redo those apps, we're moving them to a browser based system also.

Once that happens, with very few exceptions, we can run any OS we choose. And since our Macs have consistently needed only a tiny fraction of the support required by our Windows computers, guess what we'll be buying a lot more of in the future?

It looks like Vista will save us money and make us more secure. Because it has helped us to justify using a lot fewer Windows computers.

[ddesy]

IE 7 and web based apps

IE 7, Vista's primary browser, isn't all it's cracked up to be. Some web based apps no longer function 100% properly with it. For that reason alone Vista is worth avoiding for some people.

[gggg sssss]

clue

but you are willing to pay a 50 percent premium to get a Mac - to lower costs? I want a puff of whatever you are smoking

[Orion Blastar]

Oh really? What if I want to go Amiga?

AmigaKit offers a lot of features without the Vista crapware and bloatware. True I won't be running Windows programs any more, but at least I won't be dealing with malware and exploits that Windows systems have.

[top5recrds]

Ubuntu FTW

I've have dropped both Sony and Microsoft because of DRM issues and their intrusive behavior. I hated the feeling big brother is looking over my shoulder every time I purchased a DVD/CD or was asked to authenticate my OS for a simple update. I sense moved on to Ubuntu (Linux) and have not looked back with any envy or regret due to lack of function or features available to it Vs. Vista. I?ve learned many new skills and become a part of what is easily one of the friendliest, largest, and most helpful community based projects around . I have lost nothing and gained my freedom. Linux for the win.

[ben::zen]

Good idea!

Yeah, ubuntu is great.
BTW, if your computer's up to it, try running Xgl and Beryl. There's a cool environment (if it doesn't crash) :(. Overall, the Ubuntu interface is easier than Vista (I triple-boot: Ubuntu/XP-MCE/Vista, and run them in much the same usage ratio!
It's a free download, burn the ISO to a disk, and pop it in the drive! Can't wait for 7.04 Feisty Fawn... they say, a new interface.... intriguing...

[dondarko]

Right on...

I LOVE Ubuntu. I don't care if my next computer or laptop has Windows. I am installing linux.

[emmay]

XP vs VIsta

I wasn't ready for VISTA, but decided I needed a machine now, so settled for a lower end Presario with a Pentium 4...had a boxed copy of XP and loaded it up..voila..I'm good until the world catches up to VISTA.

[Orion Blastar]

ReactOS a free Windows alternative

Maybe those of us unhappy with Microsoft's Vista offerings will donate to ReactOS a free open source alternative to Windows that uses Windows software and Windows drivers.

They are currently at version 0.3.0 and ready to release 0.3.1 and by the time they make 0.4.0 they will be beta ready.

They share code with the WINE project, so helping ReactOS also helps WINE for Linux and other platforms. WINE allows Linux and other operating systems to run Windows programs like they were native programs.

ReactOS is not bloated like XP and Vista are, and does not require the expensive hardware to run it. ReactOS is trying to be like XP, but will be adding on even more features as time goes on and will eventually challege Vista.

[katamari]

Are you kidding?

Please tell me you're just trolling, or at least kidding around sarcastically.

ReactOS is an absolute and complete piece of garbage. I have kept up on almost all of the updates, and it is in no way shape or form ready for usage by ANYONE other than the developers. It's not useful, it behaves oddly, which means it simply does not work.

[john55440]

That's almost as shocking...

>Good luck finding a Windows PC with XP on it at your local retail store,<

That's almost as shocking as the fact that you can no longer buy personal computers with MS-DOS preinstalled. -lol

I look forward to using Vista, when it comes preinstalled on my next computer.

[Penguinisto]

MS-DOS

...actually, you can buy PC's w/ MS-DOS installed; DOS is still in use in industrial controls (why make a bloated custom van do the job that a motorcycle can accomplish?)

/P