Comments on: Study: Vista could create 50,000 jobs in Europe
Next version of Windows will create a cascade of benefits for local European economies, says Microsoft-sponsored study.
Next version of Windows will create a cascade of benefits for local European economies, says Microsoft-sponsored study.
December 28, 2009 2:39 PM PST
December 28, 2009 1:39 PM PST
December 28, 2009 12:45 PM PST
Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Related quotes
Well, Vista is bloatware requiring either hardware upgrades (more components sold = jobs!) or a replacement PC (more PCs sold = jobs!). Never mind all the extra accountants Microsoft will need to employ to count the insane profits they'll rake in for the overpriced OS itself.
Sadly, all Microsoft has to do is make sure that European PC OEMs are pressured into installing Vista by default on new PCs (e.g. threats to OEM volume discounts if they install no OS or an alternative OS) and the money will roll on.
Sadly, no major OEM has the guts to give their customers a choice of no OS, a non-MS OS (e.g. some Linux distro) or Windows on a typical desktop machine, so Windows just gets pushed out there *not* because it's the best OS, but because Microsoft has an entrenched monopoly position and vice-like grip on OEMs, who are scared witless of losing their discounts!
I mean I'm sorry. I feel Microsoft has some decent technology and some good points, but it shouldn't be forced down everybody's throats.
The fact that it requires new hardware certainly isn't something I'd brag about, either.
Charles R. Whealton
Charles Whealton @ pleasedontspam.com
MS software engineering at its finest.
The so called new jobs, are merely the existing ones reassigned, and glosses over the massive equipment and software upgrades costs etc!
But then again who really cares?, when the largest installed software desktop base is still actually Windows 2000!
Choices, to do or not to do, that be the question?
COught, cought, hahahahahahaha
MS just wants the EU to think that so they
pass Vista, and Rome maybe blsses it, I sincerely doubt there will be that many job created, this is FUD.
Upgrade to rediculous minimum requirements
Deal with bad drivers
Create workarounds for communication issues with other systems
Deal with bugs
Deal with worm to strike within 1st 2 weeks of release
Upgrade software that won't work
I dont see new jobs, just new hassles for IT staff
Roberto
THE VISTAPOCALYPSE LOOMS!
praise a job well done?
- Microsoft already did;
- CNet reported it as "job well done"....
It happens about twice a year.
|
At an average salary of UK£30,000 that would mean Vista adding 1.5^52 or roughly UK£1.5 BILLION to the European economy. Thats US$2,823,734,500 DOLLARS. I don't think so.
|
"IDC believes that more than half of the gain in Windows-related employment will be specifically related to Windows Vista. It is growth that IDC believes would not occur were Windows Vista not in the market,"
|
I fail to see the logic. What will Vista bring to these companies that cannot be already done with Open Source solutions. Since when did an Operating System promote growth in an economy. For most companies its a negative on the balance sheet.
|
"Moreover, for every euro of revenue that Microsoft makes, companies within the IT ecosystem will, on average, make more than 13 euros, IDC found"
|
Does anyone really believe these numbers. Assuming a third party actually produces a big selling product. For each unit it sells it pays for another license. The revenue of which goes back up the pyramid.
|
Someone I know who produces drivers for medical diagnostic equipment tells me the company spends one fifth of its budget annually on software licenses alone. I asked why they don't move to Open Source. He replied that they were so tied to the one platform that it would be too disruptive to move. So here we have a company making vital strategic decisions based on what software vendor they buy from.
- Monopolies are good for you....
- by myszak September 18, 2006 9:49 AM PDT
- It's really interesting how many Microsoft funded "research papers" keep surfacing - all trying to sell various "benefits" of a monopoly, this
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(24 Comments)one concentrates on the European market; well - Europeans should know how it works, long practice, monopolies - usually state monopolies -
were used there to sell various goodies - from booze to matches; at some point whoever wanted to supply lighters would have to pay the local
match-monopoly to have his lighters "approved", just like the hardware vendors do today with their Windows drivers: they pay Microsoft to have
them "approved" - whatever that means. There was also a time when in Russia it was illegal to throw a drunk out of the bar, as long as he had
his shirt still on - and therefore could pawn it with the bartender to keep drinking and contributing to the well-being of the Russian Empire in the only way he knew how; only the shirtless drunks were - eventually - thrown into a snow bank. This enlightened system did not put undue strain of the upper body frostbite epidemic on the health system for the simple reason that a public health system did not exist in Russia at the time. It's a pity IDC was not around either, because if it was - we would most likely learn how beneficial to Russian economy the system was, how many bar tending jobs it created, how much extra business it driven for the booze distilleries, what were the benefits of second-hand shirt market it created, what were the direct and indirect benefits to doctors, healers, witch doctors and quacks... Unfortunately - without IDC study - we will probably never know...