Comments on: WinFS heads for Microsoft database

In the latest switch of plans, Redmond delays beta 2 and will deliver an unstructured data store in the next version of SQL Server.

[CNerd2025]

Interesting

What do we call a Roman building without pillars? A failure.

What do we call Vista without its pillars? Windows XP.

[Tanjore]

WFS is a complex file system

WFS is a complex file system. In my opinion it is a holy grail of file systems. Microsoft might have realised that there are too many loose ends in WFS and they may not be all easy to tie.

Microsoft probably realises that it is quite a few years (probably 3+ yrs) for it to come to fruition or even longer.

Microsoft knows that they cannot monetize it easily. However, one way to monetize is to put into a system (Sql server) that has structured data that can benifit from WFS file system.

This is what is probably going to happen
1) Migrate SQL server storage into a WFS compatible format.
2) Migrate Exchange data into WFS compatible format.
3) Migrate office application into WFS compatible format. etc.

So when WFS comes alive, these applications can use the file sytem without a lot of hassle and users or applications, may benifit because of the (potential) benifits of the file system.

[rmiecznik]

lol

The pressure is bioling over, then need to
release a product to generate $$$ :- )

[rmiecznik]

lol

The pressure is bioling over, they need to
release a product to generate $$$ :- )

[mstrclark]

That Doesn't Make Sense

The next SQL Server isn't going to be released for a few more years. How does incorporating WinFS into it help generate revenue from sales? The sale is going to happen for years.

[rmiecznik]

lol, 2

No, what I meant was, remove that feature, because they can't handle like it is now, so
that Vista is released, that's what I meant.

Ya SQL is years away, I am talking about Vista.

[aabcdefghij987654321]

hot paying attention then

You aren't paying attention because it's long been known that WFS wasn't going to be a part of Vista.

Vista follows the typical MS Windows release pattern, announce the all-in-wonderful initial planned release and then as the project stretches into years-overdue trim out the elements that despite the additional time are still not gonna be able to make the cut. However what's in and what's out has been pretty solid for a while now which is also pretty much to the release pattern.

[rmiecznik]

to hot too pay attention, my mind is melting, sun...

All I know that Windows Operating system is a waste! and I am not going to even mention any crashing, viruses, bugs, security holes, none of that. They are a waste because each version raises the hardware stakes so much, that it makes a lot of computer hardware absolute. While that absolute hardware is still more then enough when using other OSes, yes like Linux.

Windows need to come with defferent levels of performance, so that the base key system can still run fairly smooth. If a system dones't have 1 GIG of ram and a 3GIG processor, and a fancy Graphics card, then perhaphs a lite version of the graphics GUI should be running, while everything under could be new. This often hardware turning over, creates a lot of land fill and trash. Most other computer live a far much longer life span then PCs do. If you take Sun workstation, I know people who still use Ultra 1 and 2 and are happy witha 200Mhz processor, yes 64-bit, running 10 years ago.

Still plenty of G4 that people are attached to and no one wants to get rid off. I understand the need for inovation and all that, but MS contributes to a lot of landfill mass piling up.

Very inneficient hardware, it's a Paradox.