Version: 2008
  • On CBS.com: Victoria Secret Model Contest -Vote Now!

Comments on: FAQ: Windows on Macs

There are some strings attached to running Microsoft's OS on a Mac--including Windows security risks, Apple says.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (10 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
Joris - congrats on getting through an Apple story...
by M C April 5, 2006 3:27 PM PDT
...with only a few backhanded slaps! I know the page views will probably suffer when you can't start a flame war in the comments, but the writing sure is better!
Reply to this comment
Can you access media across OS's?
by jbelzman April 5, 2006 8:38 PM PDT
Since you have to partition your HD to install XP on a Mac, can you access files pics, video, music, etc) located on the partition opposite the one you've booted to?
Reply to this comment
Apple can read windows, but not windows...
by Xiibo April 6, 2006 5:56 AM PDT
Apple has always been able to read the file format that Windows uses. However, Windows cannot read anything that is formatted for a Mac. Therefore, in OSX, you should be able to see and access data in the windows partition along with the Mac partition. But in Windows, you will only see the windows partition. Hence the concern for vulnerabilities of malicious apple software affecting a windows partition. But with the security of OSX, I don't see that happening anytime soon. But don't expect to be able to install a windows program and then access it from OSX. It won't work. Strictly for media and file access.
With planning yes, but don't expect too much
by Redhats Q April 8, 2006 3:00 AM PDT
If you choose fat32 the on formating option in the XP install, then mac os will see the XP hard drive and you can read and write to it. If NTFS is chosen the windows drive will be XP only.

From windows however the mac drive does not show as there is no support for the HFS+ format in XP. I thought there were 3rd party apps that added this functionality, but I cant seem to find any. Its a piy as this is the only limit to the dual boot idea.

There are 2 reasons I think this is still too cool for words. I will never let the Mac loose on the net while running windows, but the ability to run XP on the mac hardware means I can use this to play windows Games (and Very well) and most importantly my technical apps that are windows only can be run on one machine. Once I have the job finished and the results saved on my hard drive, reboot back to my nice safe Mac OS X and email them to whoever, and enjoy he stability and safety that as a mac user I need.

Now if 10.5 adds virtualisation and I can have both options ....

Ok off now to mop up the drool

Yes my next laptop will now be a Mac.
With planning yes, but don't expect too much
by Redhats Q April 8, 2006 3:02 AM PDT
If you choose fat32 the on formating option in the XP install, then mac os will see the XP hard drive and you can read and write to it. If NTFS is chosen the windows drive will be XP only.

From windows however the mac drive does not show as there is no support for the HFS+ format in XP. I thought there were 3rd party apps that added this functionality, but I cant seem to find any. Its a piy as this is the only limit to the dual boot idea.

There are 2 reasons I think this is still too cool for words. I will never let the Mac loose on the net while running windows, but the ability to run XP on the mac hardware means I can use this to play windows Games (and Very well) and most importantly my technical apps that are windows only can be run on one machine. Once I have the job finished and the results saved on my hard drive, reboot back to my nice safe Mac OS X and email them to whoever, and enjoy he stability and safety that as a mac user I need.

Now if 10.5 adds virtualisation and I can have both options ....

Ok off now to mop up the drool

Yes my next laptop will now be a Mac.
MS OEM EULA
by feranick April 6, 2006 12:46 PM PDT
A reminder is due here: You cannot use the Windows XP installation CD that came with your windows-preinstalled box. That copy is to be used only with that machine and you cannot install it in your brand new MacIntel. You will need to buy a full version to be compliant with MS OEM EULA. Sure you can install the OEM version, but it's ILLEGAL. Just as a reminder, WinXP Home costs 199USD, while WinXP Pro costs 299USD (microsoft.com).
Reply to this comment
re: MS OEM EULA
by ackmondual April 6, 2006 2:15 PM PDT
meh, I doubt ppl even browse through those EULAs in the first place let alone read them, but we'll see what transpires in the months to come.
Mac OS on x86
by a_harry_h April 7, 2006 12:42 AM PDT
I think Apple are crazy not to port OS X to WinTel gear, this would be a true alternative to Windows and Linux. They must have some deal with Microsoft that prevents them, otherwise it makes no sense to limit OSX to just Apple H/W. Look at the success of iPOD - once they went PC and MAC they had a best seller.
Reply to this comment
While I agree, I wont hold my breath .. yet
by Redhats Q April 8, 2006 3:19 AM PDT
Even Steve Jobs is on record that not releasing mac OS for intel machines was apples greatest mistake, but apple now has too much to loose. Apple is a HARDWARE company. The ipod makes money, not itunes, or ITMS. the software is given away to add value to the hardware.

With dual boot apple hardware is unique in that it does both windows and MAC OS. If they open the OS, the harware advantage is gone and apple must compete with dell (where's the money in that).

Steve is no fool, I am sure its an option in the back up plans, but for now its his ace, and he's keeping it well up his sleeve.

If he span off OSX the software division would make money and the hardware division would have trouble. Besides Mac OS or not, how could you live with a room of ugly dell boxes.

The current plan is fine. Hardware that runs OSX and then when you have no choice use windows, Then back to the good life.

Steve is following the IPOD model. Sell hardware and make it work with the OS that people want to use.... Both of them. (I'm waiting for the Linux Hack)
With planning partly, but dont expect too much
by Redhats Q April 8, 2006 3:03 AM PDT
If you choose fat32 the on formating option in the XP install, then mac os will see the XP hard drive and you can read and write to it. If NTFS is chosen the windows drive will be XP only.

From windows however the mac drive does not show as there is no support for the HFS+ format in XP. I thought there were 3rd party apps that added this functionality, but I cant seem to find any. Its a piy as this is the only limit to the dual boot idea.

There are 2 reasons I think this is still too cool for words. I will never let the Mac loose on the net while running windows, but the ability to run XP on the mac hardware means I can use this to play windows Games (and Very well) and most importantly my technical apps that are windows only can be run on one machine. Once I have the job finished and the results saved on my hard drive, reboot back to my nice safe Mac OS X and email them to whoever, and enjoy he stability and safety that as a mac user I need.

Now if 10.5 adds virtualisation and I can have both options ....

Ok off now to mop up the drool

Yes my next laptop will now be a Mac.
Reply to this comment
(10 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

Latest tech news headlines

advertisement

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.

More feeds available in our RSS feed index.

advertisement