Comments on: Microsoft looks beyond Vista, sees Vienna
The software maker has changed the code name for the Windows Vista follow-on, once known as Blackcomb.
The software maker has changed the code name for the Windows Vista follow-on, once known as Blackcomb.
December 27, 2009 9:15 PM PST
December 27, 2009 7:45 PM PST
December 27, 2009 4:50 PM PST
Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Related quotes
I know us Canadians are but a blip on most technology radars, but come on. Give us credit for more than just the Blackberry - Whistler is purely Canadian.
- A concerned Vancouver citizen
I know us Canadians are but a blip on most technology radars, but come on. Give us credit for more than just the Blackberry - Whistler is purely Canadian.
- A concerned Vancouver citizen
software will be dealt with in the next release.... but not right now.
That's the whole point: instead of fixing bugs, Microsoft actually
uses these flaws as an excuse for an aggressive update policy.
Microsoft doesn't fix bugs, but continuously releases new versions.
They call this "innovation", but in truth the only purpose of this
strategy is to inflate Microsoft's already obscene profits even
further."
In OS X, support to connect to a Windows domain was horrible. If they focused their resources on this, it would've been fixed in 10.1. It wasn't -- it still sucked. 10.2 sucked. 10.3 sucked. Finally in 10.4 they got it right.
These companies do what they have with the time they're given. MS is no different than any other company in that respect. Every new Mac OS release, Linux distro, etc. prioritizes certain things and leaves the others on the wayside. Windows is no different.
software will be dealt with in the next release.... but not right now.
That's the whole point: instead of fixing bugs, Microsoft actually
uses these flaws as an excuse for an aggressive update policy.
Microsoft doesn't fix bugs, but continuously releases new versions.
They call this "innovation", but in truth the only purpose of this
strategy is to inflate Microsoft's already obscene profits even
further."
In OS X, support to connect to a Windows domain was horrible. If they focused their resources on this, it would've been fixed in 10.1. It wasn't -- it still sucked. 10.2 sucked. 10.3 sucked. Finally in 10.4 they got it right.
These companies do what they have with the time they're given. MS is no different than any other company in that respect. Every new Mac OS release, Linux distro, etc. prioritizes certain things and leaves the others on the wayside. Windows is no different.
concentrate all it's energies on getting Vista right. Yeah fat chance
of that happening. Oh well Vista might be a good product after the
230th service pack.
enough on their plates at the moment, like an major upgrade that
is already way, way overdue?
On the other hand, given the track record, maybe its a good idea to
start now so that it will be ready five years after the release of
Vista.
concentrate all it's energies on getting Vista right. Yeah fat chance
of that happening. Oh well Vista might be a good product after the
230th service pack.
enough on their plates at the moment, like an major upgrade that
is already way, way overdue?
On the other hand, given the track record, maybe its a good idea to
start now so that it will be ready five years after the release of
Vista.
RSS client for Mac OS X, which I happened to find the story with.
RSS client for Mac OS X, which I happened to find the story with.
For example go and look at the roadmap for the excellent Firefox browser and you'll see that they've got several future releases on the map and an idea of what features they want to add in each of those releases.
It would be more worrisome if a software producer didn't have an idea about where they'd be going next with their product.
So please try to stick with real issues and not get all hyped up over such a total non-issue, it only makes you sound ridiculous.
It's called vaporware.
For example go and look at the roadmap for the excellent Firefox browser and you'll see that they've got several future releases on the map and an idea of what features they want to add in each of those releases.
It would be more worrisome if a software producer didn't have an idea about where they'd be going next with their product.
So please try to stick with real issues and not get all hyped up over such a total non-issue, it only makes you sound ridiculous.
It's called vaporware.
Windows XP SP3?
Based on the latest news, Vista is just as vulnerable as XP, and
will basically be a GUI upgrade with much greater hardware
requirement.
If you are a Windows fan, great. But what you've got, is all you
get.
;-)
Wrong, absolutely wrong. If you are talking about a specific, single and isolated vulnerability like the WMF flaw (which you'll agree is a ridiculous metric for judgng an operating's system security) that precise issue shows some of the biggest security improvements in Vista. LUA in Vista lowers the impact of an issue such as the WMF vulnerability significantly, and what is an absolutely devastating attack on an XP machine is a much more serious threat on Vista. Also, improvements on AntiPhishing, Firewall and download manager technologies in Vista greatly reduce the impact of such a bug.
Don't get me wrong, a vulnerabiolity such as the WMF one is still a serious issue, but the key in Vista is reducing the impact of such vulnerabilities even if they are still there (and Microsoft is not Naive enough to imagine Vista, or any other piece of software, will ever be bug free). That's precisely something that has been criticized about previous Windows versions, and it's something that's specifically and effectively being handled in Vista.
Windows XP SP3?
Based on the latest news, Vista is just as vulnerable as XP, and
will basically be a GUI upgrade with much greater hardware
requirement.
If you are a Windows fan, great. But what you've got, is all you
get.
;-)
Wrong, absolutely wrong. If you are talking about a specific, single and isolated vulnerability like the WMF flaw (which you'll agree is a ridiculous metric for judgng an operating's system security) that precise issue shows some of the biggest security improvements in Vista. LUA in Vista lowers the impact of an issue such as the WMF vulnerability significantly, and what is an absolutely devastating attack on an XP machine is a much more serious threat on Vista. Also, improvements on AntiPhishing, Firewall and download manager technologies in Vista greatly reduce the impact of such a bug.
Don't get me wrong, a vulnerabiolity such as the WMF one is still a serious issue, but the key in Vista is reducing the impact of such vulnerabilities even if they are still there (and Microsoft is not Naive enough to imagine Vista, or any other piece of software, will ever be bug free). That's precisely something that has been criticized about previous Windows versions, and it's something that's specifically and effectively being handled in Vista.
Longhorn: "One of a breed of long-horned cattle formerly bred in the southwestern United States." The Texas Longhorn mascot "Bevo" is one of these types of cattle.
Memphis.
Memphis, by the way, is a city in both Tennesee and Egypt. So is
Cairo, though the U.S. version is pronounced Kay-ro.
Longhorn: "One of a breed of long-horned cattle formerly bred in the southwestern United States." The Texas Longhorn mascot "Bevo" is one of these types of cattle.
Memphis.
Memphis, by the way, is a city in both Tennesee and Egypt. So is
Cairo, though the U.S. version is pronounced Kay-ro.
When One Thinks of Microsoft Vienna:
Microsoft has plenty of history to offer, but lacks sophistication and elegance when it comes to making operating systems gracefully dance. It is like the BIGFOOT of the dance floor in Vienna's Ballroom.
Mac OS X is white, and can be no other colour. Windows Vista is black, and can be white, purple, blue, anything you want, gracefully mixed into your desktop background.
Not that I like the Vienna Codename; Vienna is sinking, I thought that with the AMD Viennas. I have no doubt however Microsoft will finally give Vienna-codenamed projects a victory.
- When One Thinks of Vienna, Austria...
- by Michael G. January 20, 2006 9:59 PM PST
- One thinks of (nostalgic) elegance. Johann Strauss waltzes in the moonlight with one's chosen partner. Gilded halls and structures in white and gold. Museums and Art Galleries. The best old-style Europe has to offer, in terms of culture.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
-
- Have you seen Vista?
- by LordKalthorn January 21, 2006 4:58 PM PST
- If you can find me an operating system with more sophisticated tools, and more graceful elegance, I'll give you a cookie. Windows has to be Big Foot, if it wasn't it would be impossible to sustain itself in marketshare its less sophisticated and graceful competitors could not imagine let alone put up with. Although I am sure Tux does ponder it in his wildest fantasies after some fun with the Misses, the BSD Devil.
- Like this View all 2 replies
Processing -
Showing 1 of 3 pages (192 Comments)When One Thinks of Microsoft Vienna:
Microsoft has plenty of history to offer, but lacks sophistication and elegance when it comes to making operating systems gracefully dance. It is like the BIGFOOT of the dance floor in Vienna's Ballroom.
Mac OS X is white, and can be no other colour. Windows Vista is black, and can be white, purple, blue, anything you want, gracefully mixed into your desktop background.
Not that I like the Vienna Codename; Vienna is sinking, I thought that with the AMD Viennas. I have no doubt however Microsoft will finally give Vienna-codenamed projects a victory.