Comments on: Years into case, SCO asserts copyright infringement

After three years of accusations, SCO Group has finally begun aiming a legal charge of copyright infringement toward a Linux supplier.

[Bill Dautrive]

SCO

They are dead in the water and they know it. This is yet another ploy to try and keep themselves afloat.

About 3 years ago, McBride claimed there are million and millions of lines of infringing code. What happened to that?

I think that this debacle has backfired in several ways.

1. SCO is nearly broke and there stock is all but worthless. It should not be a surprise, if your only business plan is to profit through litigation and you are not a law firm, you are in trouble.

2. It brought a lot of people together to stand against SCO, and stregthed open source.

3. It helped bring Linux a bit more in the mainstream, many people didn't know linux before this and are now using it and happier for it.

They might as well have pointed a gun at their head and pulled the trigger, it would have been easier on them.

[John Kuzak]

SCO is nearly broke

http://www.analogstereo.com/hyundai_elantra_owners_manual.htm

[kalimero74]

Its a little stange

Its a little bit strange that SCO discover this now so long after accuse Novell at first place.I dont bolieve court will allow that changing of accusation in the middle of trial.I have feeling BIG BROTHER is behind all of this because he wants to stop unstopable success SuSE Linux on the market.

[Mister C]

Yep!

I wouldn't be at all surprised to hear that SCO has received another influx of cash from our friends in Redmond (or one of their lackeys).