Comments on: Ballmer: High-end Windows, Office coming
Microsoft's CEO tells analysts that higher-priced versions of its core products are on tap.
Microsoft's CEO tells analysts that higher-priced versions of its core products are on tap.
January 4, 2010 5:54 PM PST
January 4, 2010 4:38 PM PST
January 4, 2010 4:28 PM PST
Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Related quotes
I think that's what we should do at my company. I'm announcing a price increase on everything next year. Not sure what for or what you'll get for it but we'll figure out something.
Now my next question: What are they drinking?
****************
Here's a few I have heard.
I bought Microsoft Office because everybody is using it. (So what. WordPerfect Office can read and write to Microsoft Office. Even has a workspace manager to make it look like Office. Hasn't changed the document format since version 6. OpenOffice can pretty much do a lot of the same things Office can do.)
I bought it because of Outlook. (If an e-mail client was the only reason you bought it... well stupid.)
It came with my computer when I bought it. (Well, you still paid for it.)
I needed a spreadsheet program to create charts and stuff. (Lots of cheaper alternitives that probably would have done just as good a job.)
Because Office is the defacto document format. (Which version? Since I can't get Word 2003 documents to open in 97 I don't think they have set a defacto standard like, say WordPerfect. Last time I checked I could get my WordPerfect 12 documents to open in version 6.)
Because WordPerfect sucks and Open Source is a cancer. (Have you even looked at anything else. Done any research on you own. Or do you just believe everything Microsoft tells you.)
***************
Ok I was having a bit of fun there, but for the most part those are some of the statements I have heard. I'm sure any reason is a valid reason to the person buying a program.
****************
Here's a few I have heard.
I bought Microsoft Office because everybody is using it. (So what. WordPerfect Office can read and write to Microsoft Office. Even has a workspace manager to make it look like Office. Hasn't changed the document format since version 6. OpenOffice can pretty much do a lot of the same things Office can do.)
I bought it because of Outlook. (If an e-mail client was the only reason you bought it... well stupid.)
It came with my computer when I bought it. (Well, you still paid for it.)
I needed a spreadsheet program to create charts and stuff. (Lots of cheaper alternitives that probably would have done just as good a job.)
Because Office is the defacto document format. (Which version? Since I can't get Word 2003 documents to open in 97 I don't think they have set a defacto standard like, say WordPerfect. Last time I checked I could get my WordPerfect 12 documents to open in version 6.)
Because WordPerfect sucks and Open Source is a cancer. (Have you even looked at anything else. Done any research on you own. Or do you just believe everything Microsoft tells you.)
***************
Ok I was having a bit of fun there, but for the most part those are some of the statements I have heard. I'm sure any reason is a valid reason to the person buying a program.
costle upgrades, spyware, malware, viruses and Balmerware.
Leopard is coming, keep looking into the future with vista and
you'll see it.
costle upgrades, spyware, malware, viruses and Balmerware.
Leopard is coming, keep looking into the future with vista and
you'll see it.
which caused market/user confusion??
Well if you can't gain more market share, you have to break down
products into versions to get more revenue from the installed base!
which caused market/user confusion??
Well if you can't gain more market share, you have to break down
products into versions to get more revenue from the installed base!
I'd rather use Quicktime with it's new MPEG-4 compression.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/3563697.stm
"Microsoft hit by record EU fine
Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates
Microsoft is to appeal against the EU's decision
Software giant Microsoft must pay a fine of 497m euros ($613m; £331m) for abusing its dominant market position, the European Commission has ordered. Microsoft must offer a stripped-down version of its Windows operating system minus the firm's MediaPlayer audiovisual software within 90 days. Microsoft will still be allowed to sell Windows with Media Player bundled in."
I'd rather use Quicktime with it's new MPEG-4 compression.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/3563697.stm
"Microsoft hit by record EU fine
Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates
Microsoft is to appeal against the EU's decision
Software giant Microsoft must pay a fine of 497m euros ($613m; £331m) for abusing its dominant market position, the European Commission has ordered. Microsoft must offer a stripped-down version of its Windows operating system minus the firm's MediaPlayer audiovisual software within 90 days. Microsoft will still be allowed to sell Windows with Media Player bundled in."
By the way, does anyone see a comparison in the future of software between Microsoft and Shelley's Ozymandias?
Just a thought...
~Darren A+
By the way, does anyone see a comparison in the future of software between Microsoft and Shelley's Ozymandias?
Just a thought...
~Darren A+
Like the car salesman who to the customer who signed on the dotted line after hours of negotiating. "Oh, did you want tires with that?"
- pay more to actually work?
- by ChazzMatt August 25, 2005 5:49 PM PDT
- will the higher-priced ones be the versions that actually work?
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
Showing 3 of 3 pages (107 Comments)Like the car salesman who to the customer who signed on the dotted line after hours of negotiating. "Oh, did you want tires with that?"