Comments on: Microsoft says 64-bit Windows due in April
Windows chief Jim Allchin says the 64-bit desktop version will come early in the month, and a server version will follow at the end of April.
Windows chief Jim Allchin says the 64-bit desktop version will come early in the month, and a server version will follow at the end of April.
December 2, 2009 8:26 AM PST
December 2, 2009 7:40 AM PST
December 2, 2009 7:21 AM PST
Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Related quotes
Robert
*man in riot gear with full helmet and face shield steps up to the podium with a bullhorn*
*shouts through bullhorn*
Warning this is not a drill! Man battlestations we are at malware alert level orange! Exploits and crashes imminent! I repeat this is not a drill!
I want full combat readiness! All personel not prepared for this war should heard for the bunkers immediately!
Windows isn't such a bad OS if an experienced user is at the helm. Now, if an amateur were to get his hands on Windows XP 64 (why he/she would in the first place, I dunno) then things could get a bit messy.
Now, I'm not a MS advocate or anything, but I know that it beats, hands down, any other OS (available for PC) in ease of use. I use Linux as well (several flavors) and I have to say that it's still got a far ways to go before being accepted as a mainstream desktop OS. Until that happens, I'll try to live with Windows. When it does happen, I'll be one of the first to jump the boat.
ported to the 64-bit platforms before the CPUs
were commercially available in part because the
preponderance of drivers were open-source and
collected in a single place (and, for the most
part, needed no modification).
For Windows, however, you have a two-fold
problem: drivers are product model specific
(under Linux, typically hardware chipsets are
broadly supported, so a single driver supports a
swath of devices), and provided by the
manufacturer. It's the onus of the manufacturer
to create 64-bit drivers and provide them to MS
or with their products. This is not too
difficult, but will generally require more than a
simple recompile (if, nothing else, to create a
second package/installer and all those
configuration files and test them).
I'd also be interested to see what tangible
advantage it would have. Windows is particularly
popular on the desktop platform and is favored by
non-technical people with low-to-moderate
performance requirements. What they require more
is stable drivers for a wide array of popular
peripherals. 64-bit Windows is not going to do
anything for the secretarial pool of any company.
The only place where I can see an impact might be
in the server space... but here they are very
much the late-comer (nearly 3 years behind Linux)
and they are already feeling the heat. Perhaps
it's a move to keep-up with the Jones'. I'm not
sure, however, based on their current software
catalog, that 64-bit Windows will provide any
significant performance boost either (at least
not until they address upgrading their other
platform offerings).
So, I concur... *yawn*.
BTW, someone commented on the lack of drivers for the 64-bit Windows, which is ironic. I will not be surprised to see viruses and other garbage optimized for Win 64 before we ever see drivers.
No thanks Microsoft, I'm done with you.
- Sir gates.........I love you man!!!
- by March 9, 2005 11:40 AM PST
- Whatever you here from these whiners will all be but a murmmer this time next year Mr. gates. Then when you back on top they'll find something eles to whine about...{it happens every new o.s....update...service pack....etc....}. The bottom line is you've got the best thing going and it'll be that way for a long time.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(13 Comments)