Version: 2008
  • On mySimon: Christian Louboutin Very Prive Pumps

Comments on: Microsoft nears release of 64-bit Windows

Company unveils a near-final test version of updates to its Windows and Windows Server operating systems.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (13 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
Major Data Storage Will be needed
by grey_eminence December 7, 2004 11:21 AM PST
Microsoft's new 64 bit operating system will need a minimum of 1 gigabyte and as much as 500 gigabytes of storage.
.
Normally you would want to have a minimum of 200 times this on your rotating storage platform.
.
This would imply a need for 50 terabytes of storage for the new 64 bit server software.
.
There are NO terabyte rotating storage drives on the world market.
.
Reply to this comment
What are you talking about?
by David Arbogast December 7, 2004 2:14 PM PST
The requirements for 64-bit edition are as follows:

733MHz CPU
1GB RAM
1.5GB Hard Drive Space.

How on blue world are you calculating 50TB of storage requirements? Just because 64-bit Edition *can* utilize 16TB of virtual memory and 512TB of paging file does not mean that you must run this way. Lets not spread completely ridiculous FUD. Do you really think Microsoft would relese a product next year that required a 50TB hard drive? Honestly?
WOW, a now windows opening system
by December 7, 2004 9:48 PM PST
gee i wonder how maony holes will be in this "new" OS. lets see. it is going to be a 64 bit OS and that is 2 X the current 32 bit system so, exponentaly it will have 512 times the whole that windows XP has.
Reply to this comment
*Yaaawn*
by David Arbogast December 8, 2004 8:32 AM PST
Stale Joke.
0h still under beta test?
by December 8, 2004 2:36 AM PST
I have been using 64bit PC for almost a year now... it is call
MacOSX on PowerPC G5...
Reply to this comment
64-bit Apple?
by David Arbogast December 8, 2004 8:30 AM PST
True, Apple's CPU has been capable of executing 64-bit instructions for a while... although OS X is not a true/complete 64-bit operating system, and most of the applications are still not 64-bit. In addition, the AMD Opteron CPU on 32-bit Windows consistently beats Apple's benchmarks in nearly everything from QuickTime rendering to photoshop image processing, to games. (Games, by the way, are still a major advantage for Windows.) So... while it is true that you've had 64-bit technology for a while, the unfortunate fact is that the associated benefits still have not been fully realized.
View reply
Yay!
by WarpKat December 8, 2004 7:46 AM PST
Now I can play Nintendo 64-emulated games at real speed!
Reply to this comment
I was tired of waiting and started using Linux
by JLP December 9, 2004 4:52 AM PST
I bought myself AMD Athlon 64 3000+ about a year ago and I got tired of waiting for Microsoft to release 64-bit Windows XP for it. So that was the first time I tried Linux (64-bit Gentoo for AMD64 to be more specific) and I liked it a lot. I liked it so much that Gentoo Linux for AMD64 is my main OS for my work now. It looks like Microsoft is laggging more and more behing Linux every day. And programming on Linux is also much more enjoable as all is open and well documented so you can use all that the system has to offer and nothing is hidden. It looks like the feature is truly in Linux.
Reply to this comment
Win XP 64 perview
by vern8 February 20, 2005 5:52 PM PST
Hey, I downloaded the preview and burned it to a CD like I was instructed but it is still in ISO format and I am unable to open it.
Anybody know how to display the data?
Email me at vern8@sbcglobal.net
Thanks
Reply to this comment
(13 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

Latest tech news headlines

advertisement

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.

More feeds available in our RSS feed index.

advertisement