Version: 2008

Comments on: SCO flops in DaimlerChrysler Unix lawsuit

Controversial company suffers setback in legal efforts to capitalize on Unix.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (16 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
what a moron!
by ray08 July 21, 2004 3:12 PM PDT
"Say they have a license for the Unix source code to be on 10 boxes. If they have 2,000 boxes that have Linux source code on it that is duplicative of our Unix source code, they are breaking the contract they have with us,"

Hey, Darl, BYTE me!
Reply to this comment
what a moron!
by ray08 July 21, 2004 3:12 PM PDT
"Say they have a license for the Unix source code to be on 10 boxes. If they have 2,000 boxes that have Linux source code on it that is duplicative of our Unix source code, they are breaking the contract they have with us,"

Hey, Darl, BYTE me!
Reply to this comment
Sliver of nothing!
by July 21, 2004 3:19 PM PDT
C'mon C|net! You make this slam-dunk sound like SCO has some hope.

All the judge has allowed is SCO's assertion that certification should have been completed within 30 days may be _argued_! What is the damage to SCO even if they win that argument? Since the amount of time to comply is not listed in the original contract terms, DC is in a very good position here.

SCO filed a frivolous lawsuit, and I hope that DC countersues.
Reply to this comment
Sliver of nothing!
by July 21, 2004 3:19 PM PDT
C'mon C|net! You make this slam-dunk sound like SCO has some hope.

All the judge has allowed is SCO's assertion that certification should have been completed within 30 days may be _argued_! What is the damage to SCO even if they win that argument? Since the amount of time to comply is not listed in the original contract terms, DC is in a very good position here.

SCO filed a frivolous lawsuit, and I hope that DC countersues.
Reply to this comment
Way to Go SCO
by Burnsie001 July 21, 2004 10:26 PM PDT
SCO sure know how to make friends and influence people. If they beat up thier existing customers with lawsuit who in thier right mind would want to become a new customer.

"Hey we need a new system"
"lets buy Unix from SCO"
"No way, they'll sue us"
"OK lets but Linux"
"Yeah, Its just as good, almost free and they won't sue us"
Reply to this comment
"and they won't sue us"?
by July 22, 2004 12:45 AM PDT
SCO has threaten to sue Linux users as well.
View reply
Way to Go SCO
by Burnsie001 July 21, 2004 10:26 PM PDT
SCO sure know how to make friends and influence people. If they beat up thier existing customers with lawsuit who in thier right mind would want to become a new customer.

"Hey we need a new system"
"lets buy Unix from SCO"
"No way, they'll sue us"
"OK lets but Linux"
"Yeah, Its just as good, almost free and they won't sue us"
Reply to this comment
"and they won't sue us"?
by July 22, 2004 12:45 AM PDT
SCO has threaten to sue Linux users as well.
View reply
Long term effects
by July 22, 2004 10:35 AM PDT
Anybody wonder whats going to happen to SCO once they've lost all their lawsuits. I mean, who would ever actually voluntarily do business with these people at SCO?
Reply to this comment
Long term effects
by July 22, 2004 10:35 AM PDT
Anybody wonder whats going to happen to SCO once they've lost all their lawsuits. I mean, who would ever actually voluntarily do business with these people at SCO?
Reply to this comment
Thank you for updating the article
by July 22, 2004 10:59 AM PDT
This note is a kudos to Stephen Shankland for his updates to the article. It is definitely much more complete and objective now.

Nice work!
Reply to this comment
Thank you for updating the article
by July 22, 2004 10:59 AM PDT
This note is a kudos to Stephen Shankland for his updates to the article. It is definitely much more complete and objective now.

Nice work!
Reply to this comment
"very strong and important company"
by September 6, 2004 6:43 PM PDT
"It's a real shame, because SCO had a tradition of being a very strong and important company in the Unix industry and the software industry in general."

Umm, no. Remember that today's "SCO" is in reality the company called "Caldera" which changed its name to "SCO" a few years ago, when it started its makie-money-by-litigation strategy. The real "SCO" (Santa Cruz Operation) still exists, but is now called "Tarantella".
Reply to this comment
"very strong and important company"
by September 6, 2004 6:43 PM PDT
"It's a real shame, because SCO had a tradition of being a very strong and important company in the Unix industry and the software industry in general."

Umm, no. Remember that today's "SCO" is in reality the company called "Caldera" which changed its name to "SCO" a few years ago, when it started its makie-money-by-litigation strategy. The real "SCO" (Santa Cruz Operation) still exists, but is now called "Tarantella".
Reply to this comment
(16 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

Latest tech news headlines

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.

More feeds available in our RSS feed index.

advertisement