Comments on: Longhorn goes to pieces
Some much-hyped features of Microsoft's next major release of Windows are being cut back, while others may debut ahead of schedule, CNET News.com has learned.
Some much-hyped features of Microsoft's next major release of Windows are being cut back, while others may debut ahead of schedule, CNET News.com has learned.
January 4, 2010 8:25 PM PST
January 4, 2010 7:20 PM PST
January 4, 2010 7:10 PM PST
Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Related quotes
Do you think they will offer it cheaper since most of the feautres will be incomplete or not included at all? I doubt it.
I wish there was another viable option.
Robert
viable I would tell Microsoft where to stick it."
Yeah, you're right. Even if the 2000-employee
company I work at is 100% using Linux on the
server and on the desktop, and we gross a few
hundred mil a year....Oh wait....
about Mac OS X? It's certainly not the absence of the
programs you referred to (Photoshop, etc). Just curious...
mentioned. The number of developers for OSX has actually
increased significantly in the last few years. Adobe has dropped
support for some Apple products because much better
alternatives were created by Apple in part due to developers
dragging their feet. Though the quantity of software for the
Mac is less than Windows, the quality is not. There are certainly
alternatives to everything you mentioned and to most Windows
apps. In fact with the built in X11 environment you have a huge
number of Unix/Linux applications at your fingertips as well.
You seem like an intelligent person, research the options. Much
of these touted features in Longhorn already exist on OSX. I can
name 2 freeware and 1 shareware program that can instantly call
up any document on hard drive by typing. I can get to any
document/application on my hard drive within 4-5keystrokes.
The type graphics system of Longhorn has existed on the OSX
since 10.2, 2 years ago. Stability with the Unix core is
outstanding.
Before people jump on my back and call me a Maclot,
fanatic..etc, I've got 2 PCs (one at work and one at home), and I
rarely use them because I couldn't do something on the Mac. In
fact I rarely use them.
Good luck. If MS isn't doing it for your, there ARE viable
alternatives
managing contacts, researching prospects, invoicing,
bookkeeping, creating promotional materials AND actually
performing my professional services on a Mac.
Don't resign yourself to dated and erroneous myths about the
Mac platform. Whatever it is that you do on your Windows PC,
there's a very good chance you can also do it on a Mac. Mac OS X
networks and shares peripherals with Windows systems, OS X
Mail can get mail from Exchange servers, MS Office/mac is there,
along with their mac version of Outlook, called "Entourage" (can
pull Exchange mail and appointments from the server). There's
Novell software, Citrix clients -- even Microsoft's FREE Remote
Desktop Client for mac OS X, which allows you to control a
Windows PC, remotely.
I urge you to reference Apple's Software and Hardware Guide
http://guide.apple.com/ which lists 4,500 peripherals and over
18,000 software titles -- ALL MAC COMPATIBLE. The mac
platform is nowhere near as closed as many people think. As a
matter of fact, you can replace ALL the functionality of Apple
branded applications to the point that you're only using Mac OS
X and STILL have the same functionality via third parties. But, the
question is: WHY? Apple engineers wonderful technologies that
are built on a philosophy and set of priorities different than
Microsoft's; philosophies and priorities that I am confident you
will appreciate, whether you end up "switching" or not.
Not since the 1980's has there been a better time to use a Mac.
Despite Apple's quarterly market-share not outpacing the Wintel
market-share of QUARTERLY SALES, they are generally selling
MORE COMPUTERS than THEY DID in recent years. That means
positive user-base growth based on actual numbers, versus
comparing their growth to the Wintel's growth as a percentage (I
hope I am making myself clear, there).
As for Adobe? They frankly threw in the towel with Adobe
Premier in light of the significant adoption rate within the film
and television industry of Final Cut Pro. Premier was languishing
as Adobe rested on its laurels of having the big chunk of this
user-base (kind of like how Microsoft usually behaves). I;d like
to point out that Avid (another "heavy iron" video editing entity
for Mac and Windows) has NOT done the same as Adobe,
improving their products and lowering their prices to reflect the
new reality of DV editing. So, it's a contrast in attitudes.
There IS a viable option, Robert. I sit in front of it every day and
run my business on it. Every person's needs are particular, and
nobody should EVER count out the Mac platform unless they
have taken the time to benefit themselves with research
particular to THEIR needs.
There is WAY MORE to this platform than meets the eye or is
commonly believed.
Check it out :)
Whaaat? Linux has too many choices for you? That is what Linux is all about " Choice " and most all it will be your choice. Open Office will take care of all your word proccesing needs and more, most Linux users say screw PhotoDeluxe, they have The Gimp now, sorry I have been a Linux user now for 7 years.
Ahhh yes, Then there is Apple! Robert, I have been working with computers for over 35 years now and up until 2 months ago, I had never worked on an Apple machine. The machine I picked up to repair ( Are you ready, you Apple fans ), was a 7 year old E-MAC flavor ( orange ) system with only 32 megs of ram. I pumped that little puppy's memory up to max, it runs so nice, no burps, no bleeps, no blue sceen of death, I realy did not want to give it back to the customer. I even had it up on a dial up modem for over 24 hours running AOL with out a drop off, try that with a Winblows machine.
Yes sir Robert, I am eye balling an Apple I-MAC with the 20" screen and I say it's cost, is less then what I have tied up in a Winblows machine.
Yea Robert, I hear ya.
The IT press keeps spewing MS garbage. Soon, the Internet will be unusable. There is a commentary on this sight backing up this claim.
Microsoft should be forced to recall all of their flawed software as it has put the world's economy in harm's way.
I don't care what idiot MS yes men think about it. Just keep using their products and you will be burned as well.
Microsoft is criminal. They have caused more damage than any other product developer in the history of the world. Quit talking about some future software and make them pay for the trash they have been selling for years.
Make any excuse you like, but the facts are that Microsoft and their products are the only thing costing the economy billions of dollars in damages.
Microsoft needs to be sued and then forced to shut down operations. I am writing to my legilators. And intend to make as much noise as possible. And all the MS brown nosers can keep that ring around your nose.
And i am NOT pro-MS, i am writing this on a Linux machine running mozilla. I just dun think people should just shoot their mouths off with dumb comments.
Longhorn is maybe 5-7 years away as promised. I wonder what Linux will look like then?
I also have to wonder what Lonhorn will look like. I remember Windows 98 Se, remember what followed it? WinDoZe ME the worst buggy bloated piece of junk ever released. I Like Xp, but I have a fear that Longhorn will be the equivlant of ME. Late, buggy, and bloated.
- WinFS not dropped
- by stormz77 May 18, 2004 7:56 AM PDT
- I attended a Longhorn showcase by a MS rep. at Intergraph here in Huntsville yesterday. He referred to WinFS in depth as forthcoming in Longhorn in 2006. I asked him about this article claiming WinFS was getting dropped until 2009. He just laughed and said that there is no merit in that statement. WinFS is still on track according to their reps...of course, we'll all find out in 2+ years for sure. FYI: c|net
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(18 Comments)