Comments on: Not all will see Longhorn in 3D
The next version of Windows will sport some fancy three-dimensional graphics, but for those with an older video card, Longhorn will look a lot like Windows 2000.
The next version of Windows will sport some fancy three-dimensional graphics, but for those with an older video card, Longhorn will look a lot like Windows 2000.
January 4, 2010 3:17 PM PST
January 4, 2010 2:34 PM PST
January 4, 2010 1:48 PM PST
Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Related quotes
3 years ago. Longhorn's recommmended hardware specs are
ridiculous and Mac OSX gets faster and less encumbered on
older hardware with each release plus OSX is already leaps and
bounds ahead of where Windows HOPES it will be by 2006 in the
GUI department. ...and people wonder why people like myself
who have been in professional IT consulting for over a decade
are now using Macs? I have all the power and portability of
Unix, plus the best GUI any OS could hope to have. (and it keeps
getting better!) I hear people gripe about the price of Macs, yet
every new Windows OS practically requires a PC upgrade
(Longhorn will require EXTENSIVE upgrades from today's PC's),
my 3 year old G4-550 Powerbook performs marvelously and
flawlessly 24/7, needs not to be upgraded (though I'm lusting
for a G5), and every release of OSX runs BETTER on my laptop
than the previous one. Let's talk ROI people! : ) You WIndows
folks, can wait if you want, I'll continue to support you and your
networks, patch your security holes and buggy software, and
take your money to the bank, but I'll be d*mned if I'll throw mine
away on Longhorn or any other Windows OS in my house or my
shop. It was fun while it lasted, but I've met a new love.
old original iMac Bondi Blue G3/233 as an experiment and it
runs better and faster than the previous version of Mac OS X
10.1! Of course I helped it a little by adding more memory to
get it up to 384MB and the maximum built-in 6MB Video
Memory seems to be enough for a pleasant interface but is
limited to non graphic intensive applications. But overall the
darn thing works great and is extremely stable!
My personal opinion is this software would be a "Longhorn"
killer app if only Apple would port it for PC's but make some
features "better" if used on a Mac. Like iTunes is now.
will be getting people to upgrade. Every computer out today is
apparently too slow to run it, so everyone will have to upgrade.
In the meantime, Mac OS X runs on any computer since the iMac
(1998) and boasts the same feature set as Longhorn, and is
available today. And guess who first introduced the tiered
graphics for the OS? Apple with Quartz Extreme in Mac OS X
10.2.
- "We're not doing 3D in the (Windows) shell because it is cool"
- by April 28, 2005 7:16 AM PDT
- WHY NOT???? Why not do something just because it's so freaking cool?? That's what I like about Apple. They do stuff just to make using the UI feel good. I remember using an SGI workstation 10 years ago and when you closed a window it would twirl and shrink away. Our regular ol' PC's have way more power than that these days, but MS hasn't used it. Kinda sad really.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(11 Comments)