Comments on: Can a new hard drive meet the flash challenge?

One-inch drives are being munched by flash memory. 1.8-inchers seem too big. Could 1.3-inchers be just right?

[Below Meigh]

Codenamed: Deathstar Drives...

If any of you have had to deal with the former IBM Deskstar (aka Deathstar) drives, good luck to Hitachi.
What we really need here is a revolution (pun) to stop putting mechanical drives in computers to depend on for data. It is the failure point for data loss. Not powerloss. Not cooling. But using a mechanical means to store your data. And it's slow.
Notice how the manufacturers are keeping the drives now at one year warranty. Only a few drives are 3-5 years (Raptors and SCSI). And a convoluted replacement scheme: You send your under-warranty but failed drive in (to 3rd party) for data recovery, meanwhile the manufacturer wants a deposit for a replacement drive and mandates you return the defective within 14 days or be charged MSRP for the replacement. It may take 14 days (unless you pay a premium) to turnaround your data and get your original drive back (opened and voided warranty) to exhange for the new warranty replacement.
Makes you want to become a Luddite.

Use wisely - use wisely

I have a 40Gb external drive. But I don't worry too much about mechanical failure.

Q. Why ?
A. Because I do NOT use it for permanent storage. I configure it as a (semi-permanent), mobile image. I mainly use it to ship data between home & work machine's. I have images on each machine & load up the drive, unplug, get to the destination, plug in, upload. It uses USB 2 & it's plenty fast enough for almost anything except real time streaming video.

It's a great alternative to a laptop, if you just want something smaller than an iPod, to transport your data. If you want to work en route, take a laptop, if not, just take the drive, containing a COPY of your data.

Mine's got mp3s, pictures & all sorts of project data. I do have about 25-30 Gb on it, depending on the project files, so a USB keychain is NOT an alternative.

[Jim Hubbard]

That's what RAIDs are for....

No storage solution is perfect. You MUST back up your data on any storage solution to aviod losing it.

Whether you use raid or choose to use a second drive to store an image of your first drive (like Acronis TrueImage), you need to do some type of backup.

The flash drives also have a limitation that I hardly see mentioned. You cannot write to them indefinitely. Most have a very limited read/write lifetime. And this write lifetime of flash drives is significantly lower than that of mechanical hard drives.

[Razzl]

breathe life into the floppy

I've noticed that the venerable 1.44 mb floppy disc is hanging in there--many of us or our companies have bought usb external drives when our new computers didn't come with one, because so many of us have important data still archived on them and because they are cheap, disposable, reusable ways to share small amounts of data--I think there's a real market for a "next-gen" floppy to insert in those drives and hold a lot more data. Whoever gives us an 8gb floppy will find a profitable market...

[lukenova]

ZIP

The ZIP drive was the answer to a higher capacity floppy. It didn't really get widespread use because it is SLOW. ZIP drives run about the same speed as a floppy drive and the media is EXPENSIVE. It is much easier to buy CDRs and just use a new CD each time instead of buying one ZIP disk. I say for slightly small storage and easy transportability, use a flash drive. For anything else, get an external hard drive. I have an external hard drive that was salvaged from an old hard drive that works on USB2 and does everything I could ever need for transporting large amounts of data.

[cnet123_20]

count of characters in subject line count of characters in subject linecoun

count of characters in subject line count of characters in subject linecoun