Comments on: Microsoft-Yahoo the mother of all clusterbombs
To pull this off, Microsoft's Steve Ballmer will need to throw one hell of a hail mary pass, says CNET News.com's Charles Cooper.
Most Popular
Latest tech news headlines
- The secret behind the Kindle's best-selling e-books: They're not for sale
December 29, 2009 5:41 AM PST
- 2010 the year of cloud-computing...M&A
December 29, 2009 4:19 AM PST
- Verizon sees rise of 'slate' computers in 2010
December 29, 2009 4:00 AM PST
- See all headlines
RSS Feeds
Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
- Markets
Related quotes
The National Enquirer..!!
The National Enquirer..!!
What if, instead, it is an encirclement move?
Google rules web search and they are trying (without much success) to break out into the broader web 2.0 arena. Yes, Gmail is mildly successful. Youtube draws views but revenue? Unclear, so far...
Yahoo has a lot of valuable web "storefronts" and products that can be combined FEDERATED STORES-style, into a highly attractive advertising "mall" of sorts when combined with the products MS already has and is developing.
Also, consider that MS has been looking for somebody to, in effect, manage their MSN properties without much success so this could be a way to bring in an experienced new team of middle managers to the fold.
In other words, MS may be buying Yahoo to get Yahoo to take over MSN, etc. It may not be the Yahoo guys that go packing in the consolidated operation, but rather the MS online guys.
Considering the cost to MS of this buyout works out to something like 15 months worth of profits (=maybe half their current cash stash) the deal makes plenty of sense on both ends.
The real question then becomes, what does google do? Time Warner doesn't seem interested in selling AOL so maybe the way to go is for google to buy ADOBE.
Think about that one...
Google has enough talent and brains to continue to come up with original ideas that will sweep the internet. The make it, release it, people flock to it, market share goes up, because what they make, they make well.
Microsoft can't make anything well, so they have to buy Yahoo, who isn't doing hot them self.
If you ask me, this is one fu#$ed up deal, good for yahoo, I would take the money and run, Microsoft is bunch of fools.
where the issues start. Yahoo has been founded by someone
who detests MS. I am sure some of that hatred is also apparent
in their employees. Also, Yahoo has been doing most of its
work off open source software (and has been avoiding MS
products like the plague). So how do these 2 cultures merge? I
think it is VERY likely you will see a huge outflux of good Yahoo
employees to companies such as Google, Red Hat, Apple and
maybe even Sun. I think MS is not going to be able to keep a
major asset Yahoo currently possesses in its employees.
What if, instead, it is an encirclement move?
Google rules web search and they are trying (without much success) to break out into the broader web 2.0 arena. Yes, Gmail is mildly successful. Youtube draws views but revenue? Unclear, so far...
Yahoo has a lot of valuable web "storefronts" and products that can be combined FEDERATED STORES-style, into a highly attractive advertising "mall" of sorts when combined with the products MS already has and is developing.
Also, consider that MS has been looking for somebody to, in effect, manage their MSN properties without much success so this could be a way to bring in an experienced new team of middle managers to the fold.
In other words, MS may be buying Yahoo to get Yahoo to take over MSN, etc. It may not be the Yahoo guys that go packing in the consolidated operation, but rather the MS online guys.
Considering the cost to MS of this buyout works out to something like 15 months worth of profits (=maybe half their current cash stash) the deal makes plenty of sense on both ends.
The real question then becomes, what does google do? Time Warner doesn't seem interested in selling AOL so maybe the way to go is for google to buy ADOBE.
Think about that one...
Google has enough talent and brains to continue to come up with original ideas that will sweep the internet. The make it, release it, people flock to it, market share goes up, because what they make, they make well.
Microsoft can't make anything well, so they have to buy Yahoo, who isn't doing hot them self.
If you ask me, this is one fu#$ed up deal, good for yahoo, I would take the money and run, Microsoft is bunch of fools.
where the issues start. Yahoo has been founded by someone
who detests MS. I am sure some of that hatred is also apparent
in their employees. Also, Yahoo has been doing most of its
work off open source software (and has been avoiding MS
products like the plague). So how do these 2 cultures merge? I
think it is VERY likely you will see a huge outflux of good Yahoo
employees to companies such as Google, Red Hat, Apple and
maybe even Sun. I think MS is not going to be able to keep a
major asset Yahoo currently possesses in its employees.
If this pair can make those things better with their partnership then Google and Yahoo_MSN could enter a good strong horse race.
Another thing i would watch out for with this is how well other interest groups are bought in on the effort and used to make even more profit for all alongside !!!!!!individuals(Ummmmm my day will come).
If this pair can make those things better with their partnership then Google and Yahoo_MSN could enter a good strong horse race.
Another thing i would watch out for with this is how well other interest groups are bought in on the effort and used to make even more profit for all alongside !!!!!!individuals(Ummmmm my day will come).
Retire Coop, you're past it.
Second point, Apple didn't rule in the 90s. It limped along on the verge of irrelevance until the second coming of St. Steve.
Retire Coop, you're past it.
Second point, Apple didn't rule in the 90s. It limped along on the verge of irrelevance until the second coming of St. Steve.
I predict they'll screw up Yahoo Mail the same way that they did Hotmail after they acquired that.
I predict they'll screw up Yahoo Mail the same way that they did Hotmail after they acquired that.
Cheers
Cheers
IBMs role is not to try and out Google Google or Out Microsoft Microsoft. Although Having expert capabilities with both professions could help IBMs functionality IBMs market is one of stability and high performace.
IBM is made up of many highly skilled professional technically minded individuals and its is in Maintainance, Excelence and odd little Engineering Avenus that IBM needs to be.
If IBM Did focus on Small business holistical OS's and target all with a Google of googles then who knows what would be falling apart and not up to scratch with the ground work the engineeris were supposed to be doing. Yes indeed there is room for IBM to work well in the market and profit but IBM is a group with functionality in mind and with all the demands the world has we need it more than Ever.
IBMs role is not to try and out Google Google or Out Microsoft Microsoft. Although Having expert capabilities with both professions could help IBMs functionality IBMs market is one of stability and high performace.
IBM is made up of many highly skilled professional technically minded individuals and its is in Maintainance, Excelence and odd little Engineering Avenus that IBM needs to be.
If IBM Did focus on Small business holistical OS's and target all with a Google of googles then who knows what would be falling apart and not up to scratch with the ground work the engineeris were supposed to be doing. Yes indeed there is room for IBM to work well in the market and profit but IBM is a group with functionality in mind and with all the demands the world has we need it more than Ever.
Well i'm Saying that problems can be solved. Like the idea of Macros linked to specialists and innovators helping crop yeilds or groups working with IBM developments helping the Airport situation.
However to solve these things individual inclusion into the system is whats important.
What i was saying is that investors should clock how well Microsoft and Google make use of these Farms and how well they include people to work markets better for the economy.
You definitly have a point with their current technical detials needing to be dealt with.
HP needs to think out side of the box and so does Dell.
For example if more intergrated services were to come about making lowwatt and speciallist systems more approprite.
Examples
Eco PC's, Child PC's Student PC's, Consumer Rendering and Array Calculator devices.
Digital remastering stations.
The problem here is that HP has gone for Effciency and made deals with outsourcing group in a lot of ways because the staff their at present are more loyal and cheaper.
However These extra markets can generate extra revenu and spreed the load.
The problem is CIA opression of intelligent individuals making Govenment dependancy and intervention more wanted and other peopls war more acceptable.
However the Market in the US is still a central hub of educated hardworking people quite capable of rising above any ragime especially if in a place of greater need.
Buddy we've just spun an extra billion talking here.
Now, "All Your Base (Server Farms and "intelligent individuals" thoughts) Are Belong To Us"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L9oh3gqOEKU
Well i'm Saying that problems can be solved. Like the idea of Macros linked to specialists and innovators helping crop yeilds or groups working with IBM developments helping the Airport situation.
However to solve these things individual inclusion into the system is whats important.
What i was saying is that investors should clock how well Microsoft and Google make use of these Farms and how well they include people to work markets better for the economy.
You definitly have a point with their current technical detials needing to be dealt with.
HP needs to think out side of the box and so does Dell.
For example if more intergrated services were to come about making lowwatt and speciallist systems more approprite.
Examples
Eco PC's, Child PC's Student PC's, Consumer Rendering and Array Calculator devices.
Digital remastering stations.
The problem here is that HP has gone for Effciency and made deals with outsourcing group in a lot of ways because the staff their at present are more loyal and cheaper.
However These extra markets can generate extra revenu and spreed the load.
The problem is CIA opression of intelligent individuals making Govenment dependancy and intervention more wanted and other peopls war more acceptable.
However the Market in the US is still a central hub of educated hardworking people quite capable of rising above any ragime especially if in a place of greater need.
Buddy we've just spun an extra billion talking here.
Now, "All Your Base (Server Farms and "intelligent individuals" thoughts) Are Belong To Us"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L9oh3gqOEKU
- $1
- by wildchild_plasma_gyro February 2, 2008 12:22 PM PST
- thats one dollar that pays for a server.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
Showing 1 of 3 pages (148 Comments)thats one server that lets a women make a profitable channel
thats one workman who pays the farmer for his fine new purple carrot cake chosing the super healthy option becasue these women ect who were doing other things now want his workmanship.
And thats Economics
So thats one shop that stocked the carrot cake not scrapping the stock today and hence not increasing the price of the other items.
all from the power of 1 dollar that American family payed the server farm dude with.
That market of level of social capitalism could exsist its just waiting for an opening and better software.
So whats in the way the dollar spending, the capital wealth.
Nope
the lack of trained software engineers and clever managers.
Why
1) Cultural apathy
2) Militerial Opression
3) Greed at the top
4) over Taxation (poor individual service return) and poor governmental management of an otherwise superb economy for political gain.
Whats not in the Way
Access to Education
Market Capital
The Internet
However if that Dow goes down Millionares will be thinking what they can do to make sure their market isn't stung long bofore the Xenu Scientologies would be attempting to get the upper hand for their 60 year war.
Of course if the Dow goes down All the millionares are going to be the best frien of social networks trying to ensure their rise back up in the market and they're gonna wanna help everybody they can succeed in the market.
So what happens instead.
They hit the poorest groups, First helping them inproperly and to rapidly on purpose and then go look the bubbles burst in the housing market.
Thats what they did.
That way you don't challange their opression in such prosperious times you just look at how Dell and HP are struggling in a market that they wanted to sorce to the wide world and work with the wider world with over the interests of US citizens in the first place.
This way you complian on some system like news.com about the apocoliptic notion of how the US is going to the dogs.
At the Same time The CIA is larger than ever recuiting all the desprite people you just convinced and your millionare who might sceme his way in better and tap the US market is warded and blocked.
Oh yes it works that way.