Comments on: Police Blotter: Dot-com swindler goes to prison
Appeals court upholds verdict, revokes bail for church elder convicted of bilking dot-com IPO investors out of their life savings.
Appeals court upholds verdict, revokes bail for church elder convicted of bilking dot-com IPO investors out of their life savings.
November 29, 2009 9:02 PM PST
November 29, 2009 5:54 PM PST
November 29, 2009 5:10 PM PST
Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Related quotes
http://jwemployees.bravehost.com/NewsReports/2015.html
Like holding out the proverbial carrot to the donkey the watchtower promises it's followers an impending new system paradise coming any minute you won't grow old you won't need to save for old age retirement.
The other religions have the good sense to promise you your reward AFTER YOU DIE and nobody has ever come back from the dead and sued for breach of promise.
When the watchtower is made to be held accountable for their false promises and defaults thay just go and disfellowship (kick out) those who dissent.Religions can get away with this any secular business that did this would get their leaders put in jail for fraud.The Watchtower religion has busted a million followers and there are lots of angry ex members who won't go quietly.
It's FRAUD for GOD
--
Danny Haszard
- qualifying investors
- by bridge solution November 26, 2007 10:44 AM PST
- this conviction, stripped of its juiciness, is about a ponzi. not a stock fraud.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(9 Comments)the critical element, imho is the concept of the business entity designed to be able to purchase options.
anybody who recalls the relationship between the word "millionaire" and how the usa bought "louisiana" for chump change will understand that at some point, any financial structure collapses into a nightmare of derivatives. like, uh, maybe, o, the usa national debt, the mortgage issues cycling thru, the spill from houses into autos, biting the wizards who fed auto money into mortages a ferw years ago for "stability". etc.
since about 1934 ish, when $100 grand wasw maybe almost real money, there has been a legal theory that if somebody couldn;t take 100 grand hit, they shouldn;t be allowed near a start up, ipo, etc, excepting under state laws, which allowed random other sub-formulas.
dotcom swindler? jim cramer is still oin tv--having done an ipo which wazs used as the basis for literallly billions of dolalrs of angel investing models, that predicted page views by the totality of americans by y2k that have still not been achieved. maria bartiromo? jono steinberg?
those are dot com swindlers. this guy was a local con man playing a shell game, and no more.