Comments on: SCO Group admits it may fold
Final straw in company's financial crisis is judge throwing out its long-running copyright case against Novell.
Final straw in company's financial crisis is judge throwing out its long-running copyright case against Novell.
January 2, 2010 6:26 PM PST
January 2, 2010 4:56 PM PST
January 2, 2010 4:16 PM PST
Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Related quotes
Hopefully this farce will end with McBride serving 10-20 for various crimes.
To see...
Is morally, ethically
Spiritually, physically
Positively, absolutely
Undeniably and reliably dead
As bankruptcy judge, I thoroughly examined SCO
And SCO's not only merely dead
SCO's really most sincerely dead.
The evil M$ proxy FUD machine is at long last dead!
And their descendants
Yes, let the joyous news be spread
The wicked old SCO at last is dead
The sooner the MSFT/SCO charade dies off, the better.
/P
You will lose.
SCO group had a failed business model ., and they are paying for it .
Besides , MSFT has open source partners like Novel , and a few others . MSFT will continue to work with willing and able open source partners in the future . it's not about MSFT. Microsoft has already WON the battle and the war with open source. open source combined revenue is pitifully less than one-tenth of Microsoft revenue . check the facts linux boy .
I have a gut feeling that Microsoft infringes in Unix and they financed SCO to make everybody look at Linux as the infringer instead. Then they sneakily did that deal with Novell and effectively got a way with it.
Why else did they pay Novell all that money so Novell couldn't sue them? Sure there are other reasons for that, but if Microsoft wasn't using UNIX IP, then I don't think they would have done the deal at all.
=:(
I especially like how they try to blame other issues, as a reason for their downfall. The best part about this....is that they owe Novell money!!!
LOL! thats right SCO, L..O...Freakin...L.
that (so far). Where are you SCO defenders? Anyone?
evil European Union. ;-)
<null>
First let me say I never supported the SCO lawsuits, they were nothing more than a pitiful attempt at blackmail. But lets not cheer to loudly. The programmers, tech support, secretaries, and even the guy who cleaned the bathrooms may all be losing their jobs. They had no say in the lawsuit and yet because of a misguided management team they may all be out of work.
Am I glad they lost the lawsuit, unequivocally, YES! Do I want to see all these unfortunate employees lose their jobs no.
As for their ambulance chasers -- those are probably more of "the smartest guys in the room". So clever they've got all their ill-gotten gains in hedge funds ... bwahahahahaha!
Chaaapter Seven! Chaaapter Seven!
Chaaapter Seven! Chaaapter Seven!
No Chapter 11 Reorganization possible as they ceased a long time ago to actually provide software support as their main business.
Hmmm... I wonder when the MSFT astroturfing crowd will make
their appearance?
/P
OS preference has nothing to do with the fact that SCO's attempts at litigation were completely bogus and simply reflected their desperation and inability to adapt.
Even us "astroturfers" love competition because it ultimately only helps the consumer.
:)
"pigs we get what pigs deserve" :D
"So long as the Chapter 11 cases continue, our senior management will be required to spend a significant amount of time and effort dealing with the bankruptcy reorganization instead of focusing exclusively on business operations."
I find it seriously laughable that they would bring this up now.
For a long time now their "senior management" was clearly more concered with a big frivilous lawsuit payoff and charging companies license fees that they weren't even entitled to.
So NOW it matters that they won't be concentrating on business operations?
They were trying to inject some humor, right?
tech-oped-cx_dl_0919lyons_print.html
...I'm waiting for the rest of the pro-SCO shills to start a
desperate scramble to save their shattered reputations as well,
but I'm not holding my breath.
/P
From a Groklaw post:
What disturbs me the most is that people are giving him credit for admitting that he was wrong... that he was "snowed by SCO". Wrong!
He failed to diligently and professionally pursue the matter as a journalist, and admission of that key fact is absolutely missing from his mea culpa. Had he done that he could have at least salvaged a morsel of respect.
But, simply pointing the finger at SCO and saying "it's their fault", after failing in his professional duties, is worse than writing the article at all.
---nyarlathotep
- Good Bye,And Good Riddance!
- by olinz September 21, 2007 5:53 PM PDT
- I remember when SCO was claiming they owned the copyright/patent on critical parts of the Unix/Linux infrastructure,and that anyone who installed Linux was using illegal software,if they hadn't paid SCO for it(man,had us shakin' in our boots :-)
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
Showing 1 of 2 pages (48 Comments)All I have to say to SCO is Goodbye,and Good Riddance(or,put another way,see ya,wouldn't want to be ya :-)