Version: 2008
  • On TechRepublic: Five super-secret features in Windows 7

Comments on: HP chairman resigns, CEO confirms knowledge of probe

CEO Mark Hurd takes over chairman's post as Patricia Dunn resigns from a board grappling with scandal.
HP's boardroom drama

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (24 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
How Unfortunate
by Witless in Santa Cruz September 22, 2006 2:38 PM PDT
It's not too far off to speculate on Hurd resigning, and an icon of Silicon Valley being smeared out of technology industry leadership. "Management By Walking Around" at HP did not survive Mr. Hewlett and Mr. Packard, who grew their business with honor and dignity.
Reply to this comment
Unfortunate indeed...
by bayny September 22, 2006 3:36 PM PDT
Funny thing is Hurd really seemed to maintain that same honor and dignity that HP was known for. Not to say he did not, but this entire case defiitely places his ethics on trial. Here's a funny lil' story on Mr. Hurd...poor guy. http://www.iwantmyess.com/?p=104
Tom Perkins
by marileev September 22, 2006 5:49 PM PDT
Now, when the investigation was in its infancy and former HP Board member Tom Perkins discovered he was amongst those falling to both pretexting and email snooping he decided to step down.

bayny, I'm on the fence. As long as Hurd can balance disavowing his role in it I think he can maintain his position with HP. The guy really brought the company out of the darkness after Carly Fiorino's departure.
I hate it when...
by obtusefied September 22, 2006 3:15 PM PDT
people whose memory we rely upon for solid, day-to-day decision making fails when it comes to recalling the most salient details sought by investigators. Just once, I like to hear "I don't recall how many stock options I have, but I sure remember the e-mail tracer thingy. I didn't authorize it."
Reply to this comment
selective memories
by marileev September 22, 2006 6:05 PM PDT
Patricia Dunn's and Kevin Hunsaker's (HP's Chief Ethics Officer) emails show that Mark Hurd was aware and approved the bogus product specs and email virus... I mean tracer http://www.iwantmyess.com/?p=104
View reply
Sadly
by heystoopid September 22, 2006 3:18 PM PDT
Sadly, too little too late!, for it is akin to closing the gate after the horse has run away!

But then again, Patricia and all her fellow conspirators in this affair made their choice of their own free will and now must live with the consequences, and fall on their respective swords to resign in disgrace is a better option!

Still, it wive give rise to the next Wall Street in joke!, when publishing a critique of any company/corporate senior exec. "say have you heard the latest, I am now in the big league ,all my phones, friends and parents have been investigated and pretexted by a Patricia Dunn 'done wrong' clone!, for my latest article!"

Now then, if the all the shareholders could raise enough voting proxy shares to outrank and dump all the all boardmembers period!, at the next annual general meeting, that would go a long way to start cleansing process!

Oh well, time is not on his side now!
Reply to this comment
Coulda, Shoulda, Woulda!
by Galt September 22, 2006 3:31 PM PDT
"I could have, and I should have," he said.

I don't for a second buy his ascertain that he didn't read it or know what was going on, the fact that HP's leak situation probe was such a big deal implies he's either a lier, a fool, or just plain stupid. It matters little which one it is, he doesn't belong as Chairman.
Reply to this comment
Coulda, Woulda, Shoulda,,,, Agree!!!!
by JustPutt2 September 22, 2006 5:16 PM PDT
Mark Hurd has NOT been CEO long enough at HP to be able to take the LUXURY of skimming over or SKIPPING internal documents on such an extremely sensitive issue as a major corporate board information leak!!!!! That was an ABSOLUTE BLUNDER ON HIS PART!!! Either, he is not as smart as thought, or he is too smug in his own intellect. I agree,,, NOT qualified for the job, of CEO/COB
HP's Disgusting Tactics
by Tuxedo_Junction September 22, 2006 3:55 PM PDT
I have admired H-P for many years, but the recent news of H-P's pretexting has tarnished the public's image of them forever.

Am I biased? You bet! In December 2005, I bought my first H-P computer, a Compaq Presario SX1522X, and I am sorry I did. I have had nothing but problems with this computer and wish I could get a refund on it.

By comparison, my 23-year-old Apple IIe is on the desk behind me and still works beautifully.

H-P's pretexting fiasco will probably be the tip of the iceberg. What other evils lurk in the shadows of H-P?
Reply to this comment
a little note
by danielvargas2 September 22, 2006 5:09 PM PDT
just a little note... I'm not denying how good or bad that Presario might have been, but I've always said something:

"Don't blame the computer for what Windows does".
Corporate Governance
by marileev September 22, 2006 6:26 PM PDT
Mark Hurd stated that there were "best intentions" as to why the investigation was begun, but Dunn never took into consideration her responsibility to HP's shareholder.

CNET has more coverage on corp. governance here:
http://news.com.com/Has+HP+done+enough+in+corporate+governance/2100-1014_3-6118799.html?tag=cd.top
HP reliability
by irdac September 23, 2006 12:00 AM PDT
A friend and I both bought HP cameras and the docks which enable you to see a slide show of photos on your TV. It produced horrible pictures and a long email correspondence has just concluded that it is faulty but did not explain why two unit bought a long distance apart have the identical fault. Three other makes of camera I have tried produce JPG files which my TV can read from a CD or DVD and show as slides but HP JPG files processed in the same way just produce a blank screen. HP have avoided answering my queries on this. A big change from the days of Hewlett and Packard when HP instrumentation was the best you could get.
clue
by gggg sssss September 24, 2006 11:49 AM PDT
get a dell next time
It is like high school clique's
by techtype September 22, 2006 5:37 PM PDT
It is like high school clique's. A bunch of kids gang up on one kid, turn around kill him then start blaming one another for their actions. The information that was leaked, to say the least, "The ends did not justify the means!" Meaning the only reason Patty got pissed over the leak was because the share holders would see how the board was spending money on lavish surroundings for regular meetings. That pissed off Catty Patty to no end. I don't think the woman has an ethical bone in her body. She was informed as to how to handle the problem and Kenworthy had said all she had to do was ask and he would have told her. Perkins informed Patty how to handle it, but you don't tell Patty how to do things, she will handle anyway she wants because she is Chief Cat and there is nothing anybody can do about it! Everyone that board was in on it and should resign from the board and a new formed, hopefully more ethical then the last. If I was a stockholder, I sure as hell would vote them out for a new crew.

The statement made during her awards says it all, "I understand rich, I will never understand famous." Understands rich, why patty? I am Rich and I can do anything I want and there is nothing anybody can do about it. I know I have been around people of wealth enough to know how most them think. But I digress!
Reply to this comment
Hp gets even more scarry
by Dolp830 September 22, 2006 6:54 PM PDT
Did anyone notice that as Attorney Michael J. Holston,was speaking he lowered his voice and sid in an almost mumbel that they (hP thugs I assume) had "gone thru someones trash"... None of the news outlets have picked up on that yet. I went back to listen to the rebroadcast of the conference call (go to newsroom, under the company info tab on the HP site to hear it for yourself)
Reply to this comment
HP Scandal
by alaric34 September 23, 2006 7:13 AM PDT
AS CEO Hurd is charged with the knowledge sent him---it is gross negligence to claim ignorance.
Reply to this comment
Important detail left out
by wbenton September 23, 2006 9:34 AM PDT
This story mentions whom some of the recipients were, but who was the sender?

Likewise, Hurd claims he never read the E-mail.

During a secret and potentially hot investigation such as this, why would Hurd NOT read such an important piece of E-mail.

Hurd as well as the Ethics chairman along with the entire board's credibility is on the line here.

Just how many more were included on that addressee list and who was the sender?

The sender sent it to those in the know and thus knowing who the sender was will be a good point to investigate and find out more info about exactly whom knew about what and when!!!

Walt

Walt
Reply to this comment
Social Security Numbers
by jfmezei September 23, 2006 5:56 PM PDT
SOS couldn't have just called up HP human rerources and asked for the SSN of board members and some employees.

Either someone on the board would have obtrained those numbers and transmitted them to SOS, or they would have authorized HR to divulge this private information to SOS.

That is one area where details have not yet been made public.

I don't think Dunn's resignation was due to the revelation that Hurd was also involved, but rather because what is to come is going to be very damaging to her.

Hurd underlined that he now knew much of what had really happened. This means that current decisions are being taken to prepare the media for what is to come and hopefully defuse bombs before they explode.

With Dunn gone, any bad news about Dunn won't impact HP as much.

Furthermore, by firing Dunn now, she probably gets a nice golden parachute. If they waited for charges to be laid against her, she would probably be fired for "good cause" and not get any compensation.
Reply to this comment
Chief Ethics Officer Canned On Friday
by CancerMan2 September 23, 2006 5:59 PM PDT
HP's Chief Ethics Officer, Kevin T. Hunsaker was canned on Friday. According to the story below he made specific requests that the investigator obtain personal telephone records. Sounds like a great guy. I am sure he will quickly be snapped up by Big Oil, just like Richard Armitage (Plamegate) who now sits on the board of ConcocoPhilips. Crime does pay, if it's bigtime crime.

http://www.theage.com.au/news/Technology/HPs-ethics-chief-pointed-investigator-toward-directors-suspectedof-leaking-email-shows/2006/09/23/1158431932837.html
Reply to this comment
Innocent of crime
by GrandpaN1947 September 23, 2006 10:10 PM PDT
I suppose now that she has resigned the FEDS will find insufficient evidence for criminal charges. Again, the rich take care of the rich.
Reply to this comment
Sometimes it's better to Rebuild than to Fix....
by fred dunn September 25, 2006 8:01 AM PDT
When an infestation gets to the very foundation of a company it is sometimes better to bring in the "Big Guns" and start over.
I don't mean the company as a whole but I do mean the corporate structure and particularly the board and Legal counsel areas.
I hope Mark Hurd survives this but as new revelations seem to be unfolding daily that is a lgitimate question.
Reply to this comment
yes,.. yes,.. yes,..
by Dragon Forge September 25, 2006 8:12 AM PDT
Of course, you've heard it all before right here with my focusing of the brighter lights in the darker recesses of HP crypt, but it IS time to now do a little reality check on HP and our IT businesses.

I have a few specimens in my lab. HP monstrosities, picked up at the consumer level and quaranteened. Has anyone managed to pick through the myriad of applications that bury themselves into an HP home system when it is setup or recovered from the pay-for recovery disks? Hint: how much information have you given away in the last year alone? Yes!, let us do an investigatiion if we are serious about understanding what precisely is going on at HP.

The first thing that is abundantly striking is that we all brandish huge sticks when it comes to insistances on having the best and brightest, the most up to date, and the highest level of diligences, front and center in our technology employees. Getting huge sums of money dumped on you for an executive postion is not a reason to suddenly dispense with your intelligence, duty of care or moral tenacity.

I do not believe for even a fraction of a second that Hurd did not read the report!! Pointe finale!! No way! You are an executive and so called 'captain of industry' (hmmm) because you have that great power to be able to examine all the detail. What a sad state of affairs that the technologists ARE the best and lead by a group of senior/executive ninnies and incompetents. Ahh but this is more and more the American way of life. America the brave and the free revells in the gross negligence and moral turpitude of its business executives.

Anxious to dispense with discoveries, the quick and clean, always acceptable method in America is to, make someone resign. Problem solved, game over, no problem, 'that was somebody else' doing all that bad stuff. The woefully inadequate solutions provided by HP, and all of the North American public and private sectors, is the dissociative pronouncement of a "guilty party".

One day when the coffee is not quite as thick and the morning air a little fresher it will be like a proverbial ton of bricks when it is realized no one does, or ever has, bought into this ideology which is meant o suggest that a proper punishment has been doled out in fair and objective fashion.

"Very disturbing to me". Hahahaha HA ha... [http://Forgive me here for a moment.|http://Forgive me here for a moment.] I persisted for months presenting Hurd with very disturbing facts,... is the public really so naive that they might for a second think he cares!!!?

Why are we still relying on HP to conduct its own "investigation" into its own "investigation"?

"Complicated situation"?!?!? "Complex"?!?!? There is nothing in here that is either 'complex' or 'complicated'. The U.S. should have had in place, decades ago, real check and balances, a control on how business conduct themselves rather than a faux posturing of righteous indignation.

And there is that legal jargon again first deployed in the Mesozoic Era, " I do not/can not recall". Oh! Gosh, just a minute while I hold my sides.

'Millions of pages', well this is all to difficult for me to fathom, I think we should just get someone to resign and call it even.
Reply to this comment
HURD should be herded
by BoxlessThinker September 25, 2006 11:43 AM PDT
This idea that CEO Hurd knows nothing...sees nothing...did noooothing is ridiculous. These broken records where CEOs proclaim being hands-on and then instantly take their hands off the wheel when anything about ethics pops up...let alone criminal misconduct...is an example of the insular pat-on-the-back boardroom mentality. The only problem here is that the boardroom players attacked each other. Too bad. The firing of Fiorina sparked a boardroom brawl...and now they are at each other's throats...or private phone records. Not only is Dunn done...but Hurd should be herded right on out of there. According to Perkins, Hurd knew and approved the methods of the investigation. Criminal...you bet. But it speaks even more to this CEOtitist...a disease of massive arrogance, privilege, and separation from the reality of life within and outside their corporations. We as normal people are sick to death of massive greed and power brokering in America. And within venerable HP, just like venerable Enron (MOST Admired Company AND Most Socially Responsible according to the press at one point) there lurks the underpinnings of elistism and invincibility. Out with the lot of them at HP I say...just like with our Congressmen and Senators in the near elections. Time for a real change that reflects a concern for fundamental rights and the well being of average people. They can take their millions and go play on some remote island, drinking rum juice drinks, and bashing each other, but not harming how we work and live anymore.
Reply to this comment
(24 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

Latest tech news headlines

advertisement

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.

More feeds available in our RSS feed index.

advertisement