Version: 2008
  • On mySimon: Victoria's Secret Vanilla Orchid

Comments on: Perkins: Pretexting dates don't match

When did the company begin targeting reporters' records? Some accounts of the start date don't match up.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (4 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
Legally Questionable = oxymoron
by marileev September 20, 2006 11:35 AM PDT
Okay, so HP "acknowledged that its investigators used a legally questionable practice known as 'pretexting,'"

Isn't that sort of like saying if a person's not eaten for a week and steals food from the store it's sort of okay because they were starving. NO, the action is still stealing.

HP's playing chess with words and semantics "legally questionable" to still sounds umm... illegal http://www.iwantmyess.com/?p=100
Reply to this comment
Legal vs. Ethical
by arluthier September 20, 2006 12:41 PM PDT
Based on what I have read of the act/law that covers pretexting... it is only Illegal (federally) if you are using it to access peoples fincancial records and such. The questionable part may come into the fact that accessing someones phone records could be considered a financial resource? Either way you cut it... legal or illegal... it is obviously Unethical.
Re: Legally Questionable = oxymoron
by chuck_whealton September 20, 2006 5:58 PM PDT
You're correct. What's illegal is illegal and seriously, if they did
this to people without using the proper legal channels, they
deserve to get nailed to the wall for it.

If it's going to be done, it has to be done LEGALLY.

Charles R. Whealton
Charles Whealton @ pleasedontspam.com
HPs Board and Counsel = legalmorons
by fred dunn September 20, 2006 1:41 PM PDT
They knew what was going on and just looked the other way.
Reply to this comment
(4 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

Latest tech news headlines

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.

More feeds available in our RSS feed index.

advertisement