Comments on: HP chairman: Use of pretexting 'embarrassing'
An investigation's method of scrutinizing board members and journalists was "wrong" and has left the company red-faced.
Full coverage: HP's boardroom drama
Hurd memo: We will take the necessary action



Keeping her would send a strong signal that HP condones Dunn's actions. And that would be a very bad signal to send.
Furthermore, HP's board should call on Mr Perkins to not only return, but assume chairmanship of the Board. Having someone with such strong ethical principles would send the right signal.
A board member who resigns because of principles is the right definition of "corporate governance". It means someone who will not tolerate unethical behaviour so he can leep the perks of a board membership.
She knew and others at HP knew exactly what they were doing.
Mark Hurd wants to wrap this up in one easy little package and sweep it under the rug. I have a better idea, start looking into the phone records of other major investors and stock analysts not recommending "Hold" or better.
I think this could make Enron look like a child's game.
- It was just Wrong, stupid
- by phillynets September 11, 2006 1:08 PM PDT
- Everything coming out of HP about the pretexting is about it being embarassing and 'damaging to the brand' - but that's not the problem.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
Showing 2 of 2 pages (40 Comments)Your methods were wrong. Plain and simple. You hired people to hack your board. When someone jacks someone's personal data (like SecondLife's data disaster) we can all look back to HP's leadership in legitimizing espionage.
Way to go, jackasses.