Version: 2008

Comments on: Sun to slash thousands of jobs

Struggling workstation and server maker said it will cut between 4,000 to 5,000 employees over the next six months.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (20 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
Schwartz lied about job cuts
by Dachi May 31, 2006 3:07 PM PDT
Everybody knew when Schwartz became CEO that more job cuts would be expected. But Schwartz denied it ( http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=2008 ).

I guess everybody was right and Schwartz was wrong.

It looks like he is off to a good start.
Reply to this comment
Be fair...
by robot999 May 31, 2006 3:47 PM PDT
While this article claims that JS is against "job cuts", from
everything I've heard he is/was against cutting deeply as some
on wall street suggested (i.e. 10K). I think this article you
posted did not clearly describe his position.
Here is a quote from another article on the subject:
Sun Microsystems' new chief executive, Jonathan Schwartz, has
vowed not to make the deep job cuts some on Wall Street say
are needed to revive the company's profits.
http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/business/
technology/14431230.htm
So the term being used is "deep cuts". I guess at the end of the
day it depends on what the meaning of deep is... to me 13% is
not deep, but that's just me.
Even more here:
http://www.itbusinessedge.com/item/?ci=15335
View reply
Schwartz lied about job cuts
by Dachi May 31, 2006 3:07 PM PDT
Everybody knew when Schwartz became CEO that more job cuts would be expected. But Schwartz denied it ( http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=2008 ).

I guess everybody was right and Schwartz was wrong.

It looks like he is off to a good start.
Reply to this comment
Be fair...
by robot999 May 31, 2006 3:47 PM PDT
While this article claims that JS is against "job cuts", from
everything I've heard he is/was against cutting deeply as some
on wall street suggested (i.e. 10K). I think this article you
posted did not clearly describe his position.
Here is a quote from another article on the subject:
Sun Microsystems' new chief executive, Jonathan Schwartz, has
vowed not to make the deep job cuts some on Wall Street say
are needed to revive the company's profits.
http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/business/
technology/14431230.htm
So the term being used is "deep cuts". I guess at the end of the
day it depends on what the meaning of deep is... to me 13% is
not deep, but that's just me.
Even more here:
http://www.itbusinessedge.com/item/?ci=15335
View reply
Sun needed to do this
by hughbaxter May 31, 2006 3:46 PM PDT
Schwartz acted quickly and decively... a welcome change from his predecessor. No one wants to cut jobs, but for Sun, this move was long overdue. I really hope they can marry it with a successful product strategy.
Reply to this comment
Absolutely Right
by phylum--2008 May 31, 2006 5:34 PM PDT
Yep, it's nice to see some refreshing action to actually help shareholder value at the company for a change. I still think (based on what I've seen him say) that Schwartz is pretty arrogant, but unlike McNealy, he may be able to actually do what needs to be done to right the ship. You don't need to be a technologist to run a technology company well -- but unlike McNealy, you at least need to be able to deal with change, and not perpetually spend 100% of your time between the back nine at Pebble Beach and sticking your head in the sand, all the while complaining that Microsoft is the antichrist. Demonizing the competition doesn't pay the bills, Scott -- revenue and performance do.

Perhaps the fun (and profitable) ride I've had shorting Sun stock over the last five years is finally coming to an end. Let's hope it means some real growth again for a company that used to truly innovate.
Sun needed to do this
by hughbaxter May 31, 2006 3:46 PM PDT
Schwartz acted quickly and decively... a welcome change from his predecessor. No one wants to cut jobs, but for Sun, this move was long overdue. I really hope they can marry it with a successful product strategy.
Reply to this comment
Absolutely Right
by phylum--2008 May 31, 2006 5:34 PM PDT
Yep, it's nice to see some refreshing action to actually help shareholder value at the company for a change. I still think (based on what I've seen him say) that Schwartz is pretty arrogant, but unlike McNealy, he may be able to actually do what needs to be done to right the ship. You don't need to be a technologist to run a technology company well -- but unlike McNealy, you at least need to be able to deal with change, and not perpetually spend 100% of your time between the back nine at Pebble Beach and sticking your head in the sand, all the while complaining that Microsoft is the antichrist. Demonizing the competition doesn't pay the bills, Scott -- revenue and performance do.

Perhaps the fun (and profitable) ride I've had shorting Sun stock over the last five years is finally coming to an end. Let's hope it means some real growth again for a company that used to truly innovate.
Sun needed to do this
by hughbaxter May 31, 2006 3:48 PM PDT
Schwartz acted quickly and decicively... a welcome change from his predecessor. No one wants to cut jobs, but for Sun, this move was long overdue. I really hope they can marry it with a successful product strategy.
Reply to this comment
Sun needed to do this
by hughbaxter May 31, 2006 3:48 PM PDT
Schwartz acted quickly and decicively... a welcome change from his predecessor. No one wants to cut jobs, but for Sun, this move was long overdue. I really hope they can marry it with a successful product strategy.
Reply to this comment
The next steps is to align with Intel
by ilover2 May 31, 2006 4:50 PM PDT
True.. Sun needs to move away from the anti Intel emotions it has displayed in the past. It seems it is going that way. First, the CEO stepped down. Second, layoffs. Third, align with the best coming processors to survive.. You want an example: Apple..
Reply to this comment
Why Intel?
by b0gu5 May 31, 2006 5:50 PM PDT
The Sun x86/64bit products based on AMD CPUs look like they're doing just fine. Don't think a Sun/Intel offering could do any better.
The next steps is to align with Intel
by ilover2 May 31, 2006 4:50 PM PDT
True.. Sun needs to move away from the anti Intel emotions it has displayed in the past. It seems it is going that way. First, the CEO stepped down. Second, layoffs. Third, align with the best coming processors to survive.. You want an example: Apple..
Reply to this comment
Why Intel?
by b0gu5 May 31, 2006 5:50 PM PDT
The Sun x86/64bit products based on AMD CPUs look like they're doing just fine. Don't think a Sun/Intel offering could do any better.
Did SUN layoff any Indian Staff?????
by No_more_H1Bs May 31, 2006 10:32 PM PDT
Did Sun shutdown or scale back any of its offshore works? I know some real Engineers who know more than shell scripting. I'd think about investing or purchasing their equipment only if they thought about investing in America and her I.T. workers.
Reply to this comment
Did SUN layoff any Indian Staff?????
by No_more_H1Bs May 31, 2006 10:32 PM PDT
Did Sun shutdown or scale back any of its offshore works? I know some real Engineers who know more than shell scripting. I'd think about investing or purchasing their equipment only if they thought about investing in America and her I.T. workers.
Reply to this comment
Solaris is a has-been OZ!
by mdturnerinoz June 1, 2006 3:05 AM PDT
Solaris has been dying for a few years, it's just going to be properly burried now.

Linux is a much better choice and what with Sun in India being a support disaster, Linux is even supported better!
Reply to this comment
Solaris is a has-been OZ!
by mdturnerinoz June 1, 2006 3:05 AM PDT
Solaris has been dying for a few years, it's just going to be properly burried now.

Linux is a much better choice and what with Sun in India being a support disaster, Linux is even supported better!
Reply to this comment
(20 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

Latest tech news headlines

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.

More feeds available in our RSS feed index.

advertisement