Comments on: Microsoft eyes making desktop apps free
Documents show some insiders are questioning whether existing software should be supported by ads, CNET News.com has learned.
Documents show some insiders are questioning whether existing software should be supported by ads, CNET News.com has learned.
December 28, 2009 8:00 AM PST
December 28, 2009 7:15 AM PST
December 28, 2009 6:41 AM PST
Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Related quotes
at that, is just asking for headaches.
Also, It's only a matter of time until someone finds a way to overwrite MS ads with their own, no matter what MS does, there will be someone who finds out how to exploit the built in ads. Even worse, other adware will try and maybe remove the MS Adware, thus rendering Windows inoperable.
This is a great idea, without the ads! Ad-Supported Windows - BS.
What MS Should do is offer a "lifetime" purchase, which basically entitles you to a new version of Windows for life. They should also have "Family Packs" for multiple PCs. I have XP Pro on Three PCs and Home on one. That is ******* EXPENSIVE! I can't wait until a copy of XP can be bought for $50 for a full version.
Brandon Rusnak
http://www.rusnakweb.com
included). I have an OS X family pack that cost only a few dollars
more than the single user license, and I get to install it on FIVE
macs. Why would a household be forced to buy the same piece of
software for every computer it owns?
Would the public be stupid enough to use this? I suppose some would. But I have my doubts that this would be widely adopted, and would likely begin the first steps towards a crumbling Windows empire.
[Note: substitue Sith or Jedi and its almost funny]
--Illuminathan.
Another way is ask the anti-virus software to block all the adware:D
http://mindyou.xffer.com
I do think that they should charge for media player and the other
app.s that are bundled, the IE/Browser for another.
WHen people have to PAY for a product and not get it as the
default
then they compare products on the MERITS. This unfair
bundlling/integrating of monopoly software (Windows, Intenet
explorer, Office) stifles innovation, but also makes writing
software easier. This dicotomy has been the problem. But now
Open Source, Free software is changing, restoring things for the
better IMHO.
I notice that a lot of people have been commenting about OS/2 lately. I went over to IBM and noticed at the end of 2006 they will officially wash their hands of OS/2. I think IBM really did screw up with OS/2. They could have had the best OS around, but like most things IBM does they never put anything behind it.
They aren't the only ones who had something promising to only watch it fade into history. BeOS had lots of promise, but the guy who owned it sold it to Palm and then it just went away. There is a community out their working on a Clone/whatever of BeOS, but Palm owns the code and I don't think they open sourced it.
There has been a lot of software that was really good, but for whatever reason they faded away or became outdated. Maybe IBM could open source some of the OS/2 code, but probably not going to happen.
They didn't make any money for the people involved and people tend to stop doing things they get no return from.
If MS made Money free and got its revenue from ads, I'd be a happy camper.
-Shaam
strategy; it's the most direct but without Open
Sourcing Windows, MS doesn't want to play with
the other children in the sandbox so they don't
get the benefits of other Ad revenue. When you
have such a thin business model (AD strict) set
up it is imperative that you get cooperation from
other companies and organizations like Linux,
Gnome and Konqueror. For instance, a closed
solution not under Shared Source would be very
difficult to interpolate with other software so
Ad revenue would be very limited to MS'
'ecosystem.'
I suggest MS focus on what I call sub-
applications to their prime OS geared toward
their live site so people are inclined, but not
forced, to use their search engine plus tools
like even a desktop tool, like Gnome,
Ad-Supported that can be even used on Linux, BSD,
Solaris ETC.
This would also prove useful in privacy
situations because people would trust MS more by
being able to see the code plus writes would be
more inclined to write code that was very safe
and geared towards people's privacy.
They must break it up to become stronger. This is
where the action is.
to where they will show ads for OpenOffice at the
initial download or just get an ad or two in the
support forum.
I am sure someone will post a response message and say 'Here you go!! take the link'.
I hope someone will create a one single website where people can go and download opensource software. I also hope this website gets branding.
- Still too expensive...
- by Johnny Mnemonic November 15, 2005 10:08 AM PST
- The costs are still too high.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
-
- still too high
- by Thunder Johny June 19, 2007 8:24 AM PDT
- http://www.analogstereo.com/jeep_owners_manual.htm
- Like this
-
Showing 1 of 2 pages (93 Comments)