Comments on: How open? That's the big patent question

To say there's a lot going on in software IP is a little like saying that Larry Ellison and Bill Gates are competitive guys.

Well-researched and pratical article

Thank you for writing such a well-researched and practical article.

[TanNg]

Not well researched

Not well researched, because there is no mention of Google patent

[John Kuzak]

Thank you

http://www.analogstereo.com/honda_crv_owners_manual.htm

Source Code Not Needed

Overall, this was an informative and well-done article. However, I would like to point out that the goal behind open-source is not the ability to steal other people's copyrighted code to create competing products. As demonstrated by Firefox, OpenOffice, and countless other high quality projects, Microsoft's source code isn't necessary for creating similarly functioning software. Patents prevent the possiblity of having options in the marketplace because of the government-granted monopoly on a concept. I realize my feelings on the matter are the antithesis of corporate thinking, but I actually like being able to choose which browser, word processor, and operating system I use. Software patents are nothing more than an anti-competitive weapon that stifle innovation and eliminate choice from consumers.

[JuggerNaut]

I Totally Agree!

Couldn't have said it better myself. Great post :-)

You have hit the nail on the head...

Besides, if I bought a Ford, could Toyota then sue ME, because Ford Violated Toyotas patents..?

This very concept needs to be challenged and refuted.