Comments on: Court docs: Ballmer vowed to 'kill' Google
Papers in a case involving Google's hiring of a Microsoft exec say Microsoft's Ballmer vowed to "bury" Google's Eric Schmidt.
Papers in a case involving Google's hiring of a Microsoft exec say Microsoft's Ballmer vowed to "bury" Google's Eric Schmidt.
January 3, 2010 9:30 PM PST
January 3, 2010 4:40 PM PST
January 3, 2010 3:10 PM PST
Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Related quotes
http://www.ntk.net/ballmer/mirrors.html
Lastly Google was clearly wrong in hiring Mr. Lee, and who gives a f**k if Steve Ballmer did say he's going to burry Google, throw some chairs and get a little rowdy, it's not like he's bluffing :).
If they don't compete, why would Ballmer or anyone at MS care? But they do care and that is why this is news and is important.
Their Operating System is no longer the majority of their income, hasn't been for a long time. They have to keep customers at their door to grow, Microsoft will not be content staying #1, they've gotta get bigger!
allowed to do as they wish, nor are they free to do, create,
innovate or be on another team, but MSFT. No Competition, that
is microsoft's only goal, whether it be windows, search, CRM,
VOIP, maps, chat, servers, DVR, online services, handhelds,
spyware, disk compression, mice, wireless gear, keyboards, web
or DB software, you name it, THEY want to take control of it. The
fact that no product, person, company, or country is SAFE from
them, is proof that their tyrannical desire to reign over all others
is the "last straw". If "Baldy" said words like that, they are
certainly admissable evidence, considering the track record this
company has in rolling over what/who they want. To make a
threat such as Ballmers did would be small news by anyone
other than from top level Managers at a company that the world
knows is hell bent on domination. There comes a point when the
predator runs out of things to consume, this should not be
allowed to be the course our technology environment takes. If a
company makes toilet paper (or windows) and the paper has
holes in it, getting sh*t, on everyone when they use it, do you
think we should let that same "paper" company enter the market
to make dollar bills, when they have shown they cannot reliably
make toilet paper? No, the company should first be shown to be
competent in buttwipers, before they are allowed to "clean up"
the economy in some parallel, or wholly different product or
market. This is a company that is wildy "out of tune" with reality,
there is no law but theirs, and after you have all the money,
whats left but to try to take ALL the power. Right now they are
sweating it, because they are being cornered on all sides by
better products, better publicity, easier and safer software, and
people who are willing to leave "them" now that they realize
"who" this company is made up of. Witness the mass exodus of
high level "softies" that cashed out of MSFT in the last 3-4 years.
Sure many took golden parachutes, stock windfalls, and some
ideas with them, but you can be sure that they were "tired" of
the tyranny, and constant aggressive, underhanded moves MSFT
has resorted to, ever since they were pegged a monopoly. Those
who left do not want to be ASSociated with an entity that has no
morals, no creativity, and such a broad based focus, that proves
they have no direction, just outwards in all areas, no matter who
else does that sector or service better. Restraint is the key word
here, too much of anything is BAD for us, and too much, MSFT,
will certainly ruin them, and the country if they are not held
accountable for these statements, actions, and thug-like
demeanors.
http://www.inaniloquent.com/PermaLink.aspx?guid=7b5225a0-9edf-41f5-bfd5-5d46abd7e4ef
Also, their previous "kills" as you so deftly put it, weren't companies as ominous as google has become... I think google has become too much for even ms to handle... most of googles' software is already free so ms can't win by making s/w free...I think the minds of the google owners together with their rapidly growing employee base should easily be able to dodge most of anything ms throws at them.
let's face it: google isn't the best company when it comes to dealing with people issues (google PR not talking to cnet, etc), but MS is in decline and they know it. better products are popping up all the time, sometimes for free. you better know they'll fight for anything they can get!
I'm a Mac-using, Java developing, iPod wearing, Firefox browsing anti-Microsoftite myself. But to say Microsoft is losing is silly. Microsoft has many fierce competitors and is stretched a bit thin right now, yes... and we certainly HOPE they'll make some critical missteps, but they're hardly on the verge of collapse or anything.
The important thing in the market is dominance. Google has gained some of that, they are the dominant search engine.
Microsoft's concern is the China market. Currently not dominated by any tech companies because it is still an emerging market. Many companies are waiting for China to explode into major consumers of products and services.
This is why both companies want to get a strong footing in the country before that happens. This seems to be exactly the work Lee was doing with Microsoft and will do with competitor Google.
From those few emails Microsoft will be able to prove that not only would he violate any NDA, but already has and while still working at Microsoft. Pretty stupid on Lee's part.
I'll agree that they probably jumped a little too fast, but they are bale to recover those old emails and that will make a very strong case.
Steve Ballmer fits his ebullient nature.
The realization of this whole situation with Microsoft and Google
is fairly simple. Microsoft is NOT a search engine company and
Google is not an operating system.
With web based applications on the rise there will soon be no
need for an operating system, just a web browser, or maybe a
Google Browser (the ultimate web experience)!
I certainly think Steve has some serious issues, and may be taking Google's recruitment as a personal afront. It's also obvious if Microsoft is able to prove their evidence that Lee was feeding the "enemy" with information while working on the inside at Microsoft.
All that to say that they are competitors, but only in a few areas, and I guarantee Google will continue to pressure Microsoft in the near and far future.
If anything, I would like to think he did say this and did throw the chair across the room. I can believe he would. As a Microsoft fan, I am for having a CEO who loves Microsoft; throwing a chair across a room and vowing to kill Google is a love for Microsoft. Microsoft being good to work for has nothing to do with Lee going. In Microsoft he has said power, in Google, he'd have twice that. When you are so high up the food chain in a company like Microsoft or Google it is not about how good they are to work for, it is about money and power. Steve Balmer realises this, and hiring such a high ranking person from Microsoft, especially one who signed that he cannot move to a competitor, is an affront to Microsoft from Google. If I was CEO I would be pissed off too, and I probably would have thrown the chair at Lee and not across the room.
And I pointed out details on not having an operating system in the other post. You cannot just have a Web Browser. There will always have to be an Operating System with at least a Driver Layer. I am all for a Web Operating System; but to think it will be Google's is stupid.
That Google would trust someone who proves to be so devious to their current employer is also astounding. Is this guy really worth all this trouble and money? Google should try to distance themselves quickly from him or risk serious penalty for the information they have already received and used while he was employed by Microsoft.
Turnabout is fair play. Do I condone the potential violation of the NDA, NO. This is just typical B.S. of the industry folks. Ballmer is just pissed because he is getting beat at his own game.
There is an old adage to be used here: "There is alway's someone younger, faster, and better than you waiting in the wings. So watch your back."
Jim
It may have been an unprofessional and emotional outburst, but lets not be silly. Microsoft employees receive some pretty world-class incentives, nurturing, and empowerment.
make you some visio diagrams of some beowulf
clustuers... oh Ballmer, I am so poor, you, so
rich and farout... dont let them make me spend
the winter in my car.. ... the picking and
prodding never stops.. after a while.. its pure
harrasment from these strangers
Surely, Steve could afford some anger management classes on his salary???
ha ha
- Microsoft
- by Magide September 12, 2005 6:38 AM PDT
- It is hard to believe what is happening to the tech world now. Microsoft strong arm tactics are creating a non growth in the industry. THey are unable to stop them even the government and big judges have been put under by this company. I hope someone somewhere will stop them because they are the biggest privacy offenders, spammers and debilitating company there is......well Bell is way way up there as well.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
Showing 1 of 2 pages (53 Comments)Maggie