Comments on: Adobe to buy Macromedia for $3.4 billion
Document publishing giant looks to multimedia content as the next step in building its software empire.
Document publishing giant looks to multimedia content as the next step in building its software empire.
January 4, 2010 10:42 AM PST
January 4, 2010 9:38 AM PST
January 4, 2010 9:23 AM PST
Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Related quotes
I hate the idea of Adobe and Macromedia converging...my concern is that the quality of Flash MX 2004 Professional will be compromised instead of expanded, as I'd hoped.
It scares me to wonder what hacking Adobe will do to the Macromedia Suite of development products. I also think most Adobe products are overpriced, which means that all new versions of Macromedia products will also undergo enormous price increases. Even worse, Adobe products are extremely user-UNfriendly.
And, just for the record, I really like Adobe Acrobat Professional.
I hate the idea of Adobe and Macromedia converging...my concern is that the quality of Flash MX 2004 Professional will be compromised instead of expanded, as I'd hoped.
It scares me to wonder what hacking Adobe will do to the Macromedia Suite of development products. I also think most Adobe products are overpriced, which means that all new versions of Macromedia products will also undergo enormous price increases. Even worse, Adobe products are extremely user-UNfriendly.
And, just for the record, I really like Adobe Acrobat Professional.
Maybe they won't change Macromedia products, maybe they will make them better, maybe they will ruin it. In the end, will it really matter that much?
Maybe they won't change Macromedia products, maybe they will make them better, maybe they will ruin it. In the end, will it really matter that much?
- RE: Platform
- by TV James April 20, 2005 10:04 AM PDT
- You are correct. Adobe has some pretty decent Mac products, mostly purchased from other companies. Their PC products are crap.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
Showing 3 of 4 pages (148 Comments)