Version: 2008

Comments on: Sun looks to sweeten Java

The Java steward plans to simplify "excessively complicated" commercial license, as it readies an overhaul of the standard.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (24 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
The anti-java argument
by March 15, 2005 11:36 AM PST
I remember when people had a legitimate argument against Java Platform due to the Performance ratio against C++ or natively compiled code. However i have to say that even thought it's still true, it became very irrelevant thanks to todays Hardware advances.
Sure Java should not be considered in special real time critical situation still. However i am the kind of programmer who always works on Databases , networked clients for businesses like Construction, or Non profit organization, Programs that deal with daily management of large information flow. Java has proved to me repeatedly that is the most powerful platform out there. The support for back end, middle end , and specially the front end is excellent. Swing library is so powerful that actually tends to overwhelm people at first. But it became natural to me, specially with IDE like Netbeans. Oh yeah the Garbage Collection is worthless if you are a sloppy programmer and let references hang around eating you memory, but that's your fault.
Reply to this comment
The anti-java argument
by March 15, 2005 11:36 AM PST
I remember when people had a legitimate argument against Java Platform due to the Performance ratio against C++ or natively compiled code. However i have to say that even thought it's still true, it became very irrelevant thanks to todays Hardware advances.
Sure Java should not be considered in special real time critical situation still. However i am the kind of programmer who always works on Databases , networked clients for businesses like Construction, or Non profit organization, Programs that deal with daily management of large information flow. Java has proved to me repeatedly that is the most powerful platform out there. The support for back end, middle end , and specially the front end is excellent. Swing library is so powerful that actually tends to overwhelm people at first. But it became natural to me, specially with IDE like Netbeans. Oh yeah the Garbage Collection is worthless if you are a sloppy programmer and let references hang around eating you memory, but that's your fault.
Reply to this comment
Open Source Java
by t8 March 15, 2005 1:45 PM PST
Why doesn't the Open Source Community start work on an Open Java type language. It may force Sun to open Java up to Open Source. Then the 2 can be knitted together or whatever later on.

If there was enough support, it might sway Sun to see the inevitiable future of Open Source quicker than they have in the past.

After all Open Source is one big platform. Why be an island?
Reply to this comment
knit the two together???
by mortis9 March 15, 2005 2:04 PM PST
are you a programmer or did you just think that crap you wrote down sounded good?

f***ing hippies!!!
View all 2 replies
2 versions of java is a bad idea
by Bill Dautrive March 15, 2005 2:38 PM PST
That is one thing that has helped Java grow, one standard. It has also maintained tight backwards compatibility, a program compiled with an older compiler will not usually break with a newer JVM.

Just like there is one standard in languages like C and C++. Any language that lets itself become fractured is a doomed language.
Been there, done that...
by March 16, 2005 9:36 AM PST
There are several Open Source Java
implementations already (like Kaffe and Guava),
including the native Java compiler gcj.
Typically, their limitations are in the
implementation of the graphics toolkit -- which
is much trickier than one would expect
(nonetheless, there's impressive progress on
that front too). Of course, if you use SWT in
place of Swing or AWT, then you're all set.

For example, the popular development platform
Eclipse, which is written in Java and uses the
SWT library in place of AWT and Swing, has been
compiled using GCJ into a native executable for
several platforms.
Open Source Java
by t8 March 15, 2005 1:45 PM PST
Why doesn't the Open Source Community start work on an Open Java type language. It may force Sun to open Java up to Open Source. Then the 2 can be knitted together or whatever later on.

If there was enough support, it might sway Sun to see the inevitiable future of Open Source quicker than they have in the past.

After all Open Source is one big platform. Why be an island?
Reply to this comment
knit the two together???
by mortis9 March 15, 2005 2:04 PM PST
are you a programmer or did you just think that crap you wrote down sounded good?

f***ing hippies!!!
View all 2 replies
2 versions of java is a bad idea
by Bill Dautrive March 15, 2005 2:38 PM PST
That is one thing that has helped Java grow, one standard. It has also maintained tight backwards compatibility, a program compiled with an older compiler will not usually break with a newer JVM.

Just like there is one standard in languages like C and C++. Any language that lets itself become fractured is a doomed language.
Been there, done that...
by March 16, 2005 9:36 AM PST
There are several Open Source Java
implementations already (like Kaffe and Guava),
including the native Java compiler gcj.
Typically, their limitations are in the
implementation of the graphics toolkit -- which
is much trickier than one would expect
(nonetheless, there's impressive progress on
that front too). Of course, if you use SWT in
place of Swing or AWT, then you're all set.

For example, the popular development platform
Eclipse, which is written in Java and uses the
SWT library in place of AWT and Swing, has been
compiled using GCJ into a native executable for
several platforms.
(24 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

Latest tech news headlines

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.

More feeds available in our RSS feed index.

advertisement