Version: 2008
  • On MovieTome: The 10 worst movies of 2009 so far!

Comments on: Cloud OS still pie in the sky

Microsoft's latest Live services show it has a long way to go before it can replicate Windows over the Net, if that's even the goal.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (14 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
Cloud OS?
by Hardcode June 28, 2007 6:07 AM PDT
Does anyone have any idea what an "OS" would look like in the "Cloud"? I'm thinking of writing a web based internet browser and I'm not sure how much of the ui to devote to advertising.
Reply to this comment
ja...
by balkce June 28, 2007 6:44 AM PDT
delicious, thanks for that =)
In the cloud not in the sky
by zvis June 28, 2007 8:54 AM PDT
Microsoft might be years away from an OS in the cloud but try out G.ho.st (the Global Hosted Operating SysTem at http://G.ho.st) - a fully functional cloud OS live today with desktop, widgets, applications, storage on the cloud (3GB free) and many more apps as well as Web mail coming very soon!

Lets us know what you think

Zvi
Reply to this comment
Not Even A Goal
by StargateFan June 28, 2007 9:02 AM PDT
Gone are the days of Mainframe, here are the days of the Personal Computer. Moving an Operating System other then resource serives into the cloud would just create a mainframe on a much larger scale. This is not the intention of Microsoft or Apple for that fact. Check out the video of Mix 07, Ray Ozzie will explain that this is not a goal. And check out the D5 video, Steve Jobs will also explain why this is not a goal.
Reply to this comment
re.
by dem0 June 28, 2007 10:18 AM PDT
I agree it may not be a goal for personal computing, but for the business sector, a web or intranet os is still very much a promising piece of the pie. A lot of government and business networks do run very much like a mainframe. The difference with a web or intranet os is most of them will use javascript, which is on the client side and doesn't have that much effect on the server itself. With so many office tools moving to a browser environment, its just a matter of time before the operating system does as well.
Reply to this comment
Citrix
by piggyshark June 28, 2007 12:16 PM PDT
IMHO, Application Publishing (Citrix) already provides this type of environment. So really what would be the big deal? I can already have XP desktop via IE or Firefox with all the standard apps. The down side is every once in awhile the network disconnects and I lose access to my work. BTW, does it really matter javascript or whatever language to provide services. The end user could care less.
View reply
I Also Believe That Citrix is the way to go...
by StargateFan June 28, 2007 12:25 PM PDT
Cirtix provides the access a person needs across a secure company Intranet or VPN. Without moving to a mainframe type of scenario. I really don't feel like typing out the web mainframe scenario right now. But Citrix provides network access to your computer why you still retain the PC future.
re: "operating system"
by dem0 June 28, 2007 7:24 PM PDT
I use the term operating system here loosely. With a true web or intranet os, the client side would just need enough of an operating system to run a browser.
View reply
CloudOS?
by Orion Blastar July 1, 2007 7:23 AM PDT
Microsoft could port Windows to Java and run Windows applications within the browser.

I think Microsoft is working on a Java client for VirtualPC Server so they can host OS images on their web server and use the client to run Windows in the browser to let users take test drives of software without installing anything.
Reply to this comment
Make sense ...
by petermpham2003 July 12, 2007 4:30 PM PDT
... way to go. With this technology,
the end of Windows piracy is near.
M$ will become M$$$$.
Reply to this comment
(14 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

Latest tech news headlines

advertisement

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.

More feeds available in our RSS feed index.

advertisement