Version: 2008
  • On CBS MoneyWatch: 5 Best College Towns to Live In

Comments on: Lotus Notes tuned for Linux

IBM is debuting a version of the desktop collaboration software that runs on the open-source operating system.

OK, why did this take so long to get ported?
by rklrkl July 10, 2006 2:24 AM PDT
IBM put their weight behind the Linux platform several years ago, which begs the question why their most well-known software product (apparently has 125m users if the previous C|Net article linked to is to be believed) took so long to get ported to Linux!

Yes, they could claim that they needed the Eclipse platform first, but the fact that they have had a Mac version out for years nullifies that. At least it's one less major software product that's missing from Linux - isn't it time for Adobe to step up to the plate now and offer its tools natively for Linux? Apart from the obvious exception of Microsoft, it seems that Adobe is the the last major hold-out that refuses to release native Linux versions of its software (heck, even something small like Flash Player is now lagging two major releases behind!).
Reply to this comment
frustrating
by ikenna4u July 11, 2006 1:09 AM PDT
Frustrating: You go to click the video and get the reply: "You need flash 8 installed to view this". Why oh, why, will Adobe not release flash 8 or 9 for Linux? How many years will it take them?
OK, why did this take so long to get ported?
by rklrkl July 10, 2006 2:24 AM PDT
IBM put their weight behind the Linux platform several years ago, which begs the question why their most well-known software product (apparently has 125m users if the previous C|Net article linked to is to be believed) took so long to get ported to Linux!

Yes, they could claim that they needed the Eclipse platform first, but the fact that they have had a Mac version out for years nullifies that. At least it's one less major software product that's missing from Linux - isn't it time for Adobe to step up to the plate now and offer its tools natively for Linux? Apart from the obvious exception of Microsoft, it seems that Adobe is the the last major hold-out that refuses to release native Linux versions of its software (heck, even something small like Flash Player is now lagging two major releases behind!).
Reply to this comment
frustrating
by ikenna4u July 11, 2006 1:09 AM PDT
Frustrating: You go to click the video and get the reply: "You need flash 8 installed to view this". Why oh, why, will Adobe not release flash 8 or 9 for Linux? How many years will it take them?
It's been done
by facerw July 10, 2006 6:08 AM PDT
The server version of Notes was done way back in 2000. I know because I was one of those who deployed it due to delays when it had a native Win2000 server version.

I do ask why did it take over six years to get a client version? I know that in the past they had a version which was done with the WINE emulator but that wasn't good.

It's about time IBM gets Notes in the game on Linux desktop. Now I have a challenge for IBM. Release Lotus 1-2-3 into open source.
Reply to this comment
It's been done
by facerw July 10, 2006 6:08 AM PDT
The server version of Notes was done way back in 2000. I know because I was one of those who deployed it due to delays when it had a native Win2000 server version.

I do ask why did it take over six years to get a client version? I know that in the past they had a version which was done with the WINE emulator but that wasn't good.

It's about time IBM gets Notes in the game on Linux desktop. Now I have a challenge for IBM. Release Lotus 1-2-3 into open source.
Reply to this comment
Why don't searches turn up my posts?
by RavingEniac July 10, 2006 7:57 AM PDT
I posted something about a week ago and went looking for it to see if there had been any follow-up remarks, and couldn't find that post or others that I've made. So I wrote to an editor and asked a couple of days ago, and still haven't learned why a search doesn't turn up my posts.

So I'm putting this criticism on here in the hope that a junior editor will see it and ask why my posts using the "Spazzman" nickname aren't showing up in site searches.

You might want to see if your posts show up when you do a search for your nickname too.
Reply to this comment
Why don't searches turn up my posts?
by RavingEniac July 10, 2006 7:57 AM PDT
I posted something about a week ago and went looking for it to see if there had been any follow-up remarks, and couldn't find that post or others that I've made. So I wrote to an editor and asked a couple of days ago, and still haven't learned why a search doesn't turn up my posts.

So I'm putting this criticism on here in the hope that a junior editor will see it and ask why my posts using the "Spazzman" nickname aren't showing up in site searches.

You might want to see if your posts show up when you do a search for your nickname too.
Reply to this comment
advertisement

Latest tech news headlines

advertisement

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.

More feeds available in our RSS feed index.

advertisement