Comments on: To grow, Borland to cut off its roots

The company, once synonymous with software development, charts a new course--without its development tools.

[just_some_guy]

Where do these "analysts" come from?

<Anne Thomas Manes, an analyst at the Burton Group. "They were not going to survive trying to be an IDE (integrated development environment) company because nobody pays for IDEs anymore.">


Really? I've bought the last 4 versions of Visual Studio. The companies I've worked at have also bought multiple copies, or site licenses, for Visual Studio.

Maybe Anne Thomas Manes meant to say that nobody pays for Borland's IDE anymore.

[Slylencer]

To paraphrase

Those who can't, analyze.

I've paid for several versions of IntelliJ IDEA out of my own pocket. And recently ponied up dough for TextMate on the Mac.

[fields24]

I also have purchased a few...

Delphi 1, 3P, 4P, 5P/5E, 7P, 8P,
Turbo C++, Borland C++ 4
and was going to purchase 2005 enterprise.

I think i will bail out now.

There is no telling who is going to support
later versions (than 2005 even). It does not
look like Borland is going to. I guess it is
going to be the Inprise fiasco all over again.

[rayl]

zip code

I am wondering whi my zip code is not taking in condideration if I want to by something from the net. They always tel me that I am missing few number in my zip code.

Real

[skarro]

It's a bit sad...

but it was fun while it lasted! I've been a user and admirer of Borland's tools for a long while. It's amazing how they were once always able to stay ahead of the curve. in the 90's they had hands down the best offering when it came to technology. Just compare Delphi (and C++ Builder) to Visual Basic or "Visual" C++ and MFC. To do better than Borland, Microsoft had basically to buy their chief architect and copy-cat their products. (toying with .NET's component library gives an old Delphi user a strange feeling of Dejavu...)
It would be extremly sad if they would end this by selling their great technology to some group which would then basically drop the ball. It would be sad and bad for all those who have remained loyal to their development tools.
I think that the best Borland could do for their developer community (and for the IT industry in whole) would be to take the bold step and Open-Source it all. It's bit ironic, since they are basically a victim of the OS movement, but as things stand that would definetly be the best/right thing to do.

[Trane Francks]

Story is somewhat misleading

Better to get it from the horse's mouth:

http://bdn.borland.com/article/0,1410,33439,00.html

The intention is for Borland to spin off the developer tools section _along with Borland developers_ to ensure that the products don't die.

For me, this could turn out to be better news. Kylix has been dead in the water and relegated to "classic IDE" status under Borland's control. A new owner might very well be convinced to breathe new life into that compiler.

[just_some_guy]

Good point!

That's a pretty significant detail for the Cnet author to leave out!

[fields24]

The horses mouth is not very consistent

See
http://bdn.borland.com/article/0,1410,33303,00.html
for their response to supporting Delphi

"Our goal is to earn their continued loyalty through investment in Delphi technology as well as through open communication."