Comments on: Microsoft rejects Visual Studio delay request
Developers petition for Visual Studio beta 3 and product delay to fix bugs. Microsoft says "no" and adds another significant feature.
Developers petition for Visual Studio beta 3 and product delay to fix bugs. Microsoft says "no" and adds another significant feature.
November 27, 2009 4:27 PM PST
November 27, 2009 1:05 PM PST
November 27, 2009 11:52 AM PST
Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Related quotes
I suppose someone is going to argue that Microsoft doesn't listen to developers, but if that is true it will only hurt them. If developers don't believe that Visual Studio is ready when Microsoft releases it they probably won't buy and use it. Of course I do know a few people who jumped ship after using the first .net Visual Studio, but not many.
Personally, I would like to see Object Pascal become standardized and better supported. I really like Object Pascal, but their just isn't a lot of support (or low cost IDE) that I've found. Maybe someday.
I suppose someone is going to argue that Microsoft doesn't listen to developers, but if that is true it will only hurt them. If developers don't believe that Visual Studio is ready when Microsoft releases it they probably won't buy and use it. Of course I do know a few people who jumped ship after using the first .net Visual Studio, but not many.
Personally, I would like to see Object Pascal become standardized and better supported. I really like Object Pascal, but their just isn't a lot of support (or low cost IDE) that I've found. Maybe someday.
This developer obviously doesn't have much experience with Microsoft. If not for a broken version 7, how else would they get you to buy version 8? On top of that, to delay revenue in 3 months in order to put out a later product that makes people less likely to upgrade in the future is a losing proposition.
Microsoft-- cheap software fast, and fix it later (for a nominal fee.)
How do you mean? That visual studio is not a good software? Don't think u know what u're saying. Go and give it a try and see things for yourself. VS .Net is the best IDE i've ever come accross. I'm a Borland developer prior to coming to C#, and since then I never look back. VS.NEt is coooooooool.
This developer obviously doesn't have much experience with Microsoft. If not for a broken version 7, how else would they get you to buy version 8? On top of that, to delay revenue in 3 months in order to put out a later product that makes people less likely to upgrade in the future is a losing proposition.
Microsoft-- cheap software fast, and fix it later (for a nominal fee.)
How do you mean? That visual studio is not a good software? Don't think u know what u're saying. Go and give it a try and see things for yourself. VS .Net is the best IDE i've ever come accross. I'm a Borland developer prior to coming to C#, and since then I never look back. VS.NEt is coooooooool.
AHEAD...After all, no one can be allowed to get in the way of
another MS surge into the market place.
But that's MS.... And that's why I don't use MS products except as a
last resort. There are too many other good products available, ....
without the bugs,... or crappy programming,.... or whatever.
AHEAD...After all, no one can be allowed to get in the way of
another MS surge into the market place.
But that's MS.... And that's why I don't use MS products except as a
last resort. There are too many other good products available, ....
without the bugs,... or crappy programming,.... or whatever.
I'm seriously annoyed with the .NET developer community.
http://weblogs.asp.net/jeff/archive/2005/08/12/422405.aspx
Oh...wait, I bet it is some kind of non-standard Microsoft browser only link. It sure as heck doesn't open properly in standard browsers, all kinds of errors.
I'm seriously annoyed with the .NET developer community.
http://weblogs.asp.net/jeff/archive/2005/08/12/422405.aspx
Oh...wait, I bet it is some kind of non-standard Microsoft browser only link. It sure as heck doesn't open properly in standard browsers, all kinds of errors.
So, you M$ fans...tell me when VB didn't suck. I sure haven't seen it. What were you expecting differently from the latest release? Get real.
I use several programs that have been written in vb6, vb.net, c#, c#.net, c, c++, java, j#, pure asm and generally really could not give a care as to what language the developer used. some programs could use a boost and a good profiler will assist the programmer in finding possible slowdowns in their program. Or just creating a dll in asm and calling that .dll..
about the only way that I can determine what the programmer wrote a section of code in is via a detailed analysis of the code.
Used to build projects using the Borland Suite of tools but have switched to Visual Studio lately
So, you M$ fans...tell me when VB didn't suck. I sure haven't seen it. What were you expecting differently from the latest release? Get real.
I use several programs that have been written in vb6, vb.net, c#, c#.net, c, c++, java, j#, pure asm and generally really could not give a care as to what language the developer used. some programs could use a boost and a good profiler will assist the programmer in finding possible slowdowns in their program. Or just creating a dll in asm and calling that .dll..
about the only way that I can determine what the programmer wrote a section of code in is via a detailed analysis of the code.
Used to build projects using the Borland Suite of tools but have switched to Visual Studio lately
Achil
Achil
VS.NET 8 seems to be a hell of a product, with lots of tools that no other IDE has "as-is", besides all the enhancements that the .NET Framework 2.0 introduces.
- We will have to wait and see
- by August 17, 2005 1:22 PM PDT
- I think that all this talk is entirely premature.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(26 Comments)VS.NET 8 seems to be a hell of a product, with lots of tools that no other IDE has "as-is", besides all the enhancements that the .NET Framework 2.0 introduces.