Comments on: Microsoft and Adobe to square off?
In digital documents, Web applications and image editing, Adobe has a healthy head start. But Microsoft is making some noise.
Most Popular
Latest tech news headlines
- The iPhone app that lets you see your friends naked
January 5, 2010 7:48 PM PST
- Snapdragon chip powers itself into Nexus One
January 5, 2010 6:00 PM PST
- CNET News Daily Podcast: Google unveils its 'superphone'
January 5, 2010 5:27 PM PST
- See all headlines
RSS Feeds
Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
- Markets
Related quotes
I have no love for Adobe, since I am not a 24/7 graphics artist
working at the professional level. And Adobe has abandoned all
its basic consumer application focus. What's left is overly
complex bloatware that, for he average user, is useless, So far, I
have eliminated almost all Adobe's programs from my
company's publication operations
I also have no love for MS, but that's due more to MS's
'innovation' behavior than to MS's bloatware apps. Office is not
bad, but it needed a better core design. WIndows is a marketing
tool not an OS. And many of MS's independent apps are visual
and functional losers (Have you seen the Acrylic Beta yet???).
Of all MS's apps, I am still using Office.
But, obviously, both MS and Adobe has legions of devoted users
who have nothing but praise for the companies and their apps.
So, watching Adobe and MS 'duke it out' for dominance will be
quite entertaining. And I can remain impartial - it makes no
diffference to me whoever wins.
I have no love for Adobe, since I am not a 24/7 graphics artist
working at the professional level. And Adobe has abandoned all
its basic consumer application focus. What's left is overly
complex bloatware that, for he average user, is useless, So far, I
have eliminated almost all Adobe's programs from my
company's publication operations
I also have no love for MS, but that's due more to MS's
'innovation' behavior than to MS's bloatware apps. Office is not
bad, but it needed a better core design. WIndows is a marketing
tool not an OS. And many of MS's independent apps are visual
and functional losers (Have you seen the Acrylic Beta yet???).
Of all MS's apps, I am still using Office.
But, obviously, both MS and Adobe has legions of devoted users
who have nothing but praise for the companies and their apps.
So, watching Adobe and MS 'duke it out' for dominance will be
quite entertaining. And I can remain impartial - it makes no
diffference to me whoever wins.
ColdFusion with the latest incarnation is enjoying continued growth - how many other "not free" web technologies ever reach 10 years of age (July 13)? And being built on J2EE but still being incredibly powerful and easy to use.
Flex and Breeze are also extremely popular whilst Studio MX 2004 brings best of breed web development tools to both Wintel and Mac platforms.
Adobe have responded to criticisms about the time it takes to load certain "readers" like Acrobat - but with MM they also get Flash Paper. Should be interesting to see what new tools and technologies the merger produces.
I was always worried it would be Microsoft that acquired Allaire, then Macromedia and maybe now Adobe. Microsoft grabbed Vermeer for the poor FrontPage remember.
The new Adobe will be hard to beat as they will cover alot of bases with superior (if not pricey) solutions.
Adobe is going to have to make some major changes in attitude, support, third party developer support and most importantly not screw up the Macromedia products if they expect to stand a chance.
And, please don't take this as my support for Microsoft. I don't care for them either.
Robert
ColdFusion with the latest incarnation is enjoying continued growth - how many other "not free" web technologies ever reach 10 years of age (July 13)? And being built on J2EE but still being incredibly powerful and easy to use.
Flex and Breeze are also extremely popular whilst Studio MX 2004 brings best of breed web development tools to both Wintel and Mac platforms.
Adobe have responded to criticisms about the time it takes to load certain "readers" like Acrobat - but with MM they also get Flash Paper. Should be interesting to see what new tools and technologies the merger produces.
I was always worried it would be Microsoft that acquired Allaire, then Macromedia and maybe now Adobe. Microsoft grabbed Vermeer for the poor FrontPage remember.
The new Adobe will be hard to beat as they will cover alot of bases with superior (if not pricey) solutions.
Adobe is going to have to make some major changes in attitude, support, third party developer support and most importantly not screw up the Macromedia products if they expect to stand a chance.
And, please don't take this as my support for Microsoft. I don't care for them either.
Robert
then they don't stand much of a chance with professional
designers. MS does not seem to be able to create an intuitive
application like the ones Adobe and Apple can deliver. Creatives
want to use a tool that helps them deliver their ideas quickly and
painlessly and not one that is bloated and unorganized. I know
of no one (designers and non-designers) who does not cringe
when having to produce anything of quality or complexity using
Word or Powerpoint. Of course, these are not programs targeted
at professional designers, but they simply are not intuitive or
well thought out. Even the Help in these apps is poorly
organized adding to the frustration of getting something to
work as it should.
Hopefully (for them), MS will take a whole new approach to
development and perhaps learn something from developers at
Adobe and Apple.... OR maybe they'll just target the weekend
creatives and mom & pop businesses where image is not a top
priority.
bloated app. Like with Word, start with a focused word processor
with fonts and all the other basic word processor functons. Then
provide a linked page setup program, which can take the word
files are build a basic document using the Word files and
apropriate graphics files. Then provide a Final Document
program which can add all the pops, bells, and whisles to s
finished publication.
Then the suer can go as far as his needs require and skills
permit. At least it sounds like a good idea - much better than
having everything crammed into one program.
For creative professionals Adobe will smoke Microsoft. Microsoft is just giving its office user guys more toys to play with and frustrate color houses output efforts. (IMO)
then they don't stand much of a chance with professional
designers. MS does not seem to be able to create an intuitive
application like the ones Adobe and Apple can deliver. Creatives
want to use a tool that helps them deliver their ideas quickly and
painlessly and not one that is bloated and unorganized. I know
of no one (designers and non-designers) who does not cringe
when having to produce anything of quality or complexity using
Word or Powerpoint. Of course, these are not programs targeted
at professional designers, but they simply are not intuitive or
well thought out. Even the Help in these apps is poorly
organized adding to the frustration of getting something to
work as it should.
Hopefully (for them), MS will take a whole new approach to
development and perhaps learn something from developers at
Adobe and Apple.... OR maybe they'll just target the weekend
creatives and mom & pop businesses where image is not a top
priority.
bloated app. Like with Word, start with a focused word processor
with fonts and all the other basic word processor functons. Then
provide a linked page setup program, which can take the word
files are build a basic document using the Word files and
apropriate graphics files. Then provide a Final Document
program which can add all the pops, bells, and whisles to s
finished publication.
Then the suer can go as far as his needs require and skills
permit. At least it sounds like a good idea - much better than
having everything crammed into one program.
For creative professionals Adobe will smoke Microsoft. Microsoft is just giving its office user guys more toys to play with and frustrate color houses output efforts. (IMO)
Recycled material...next!
Recycled material...next!
Apple has embraced Photoshop, PDF, and Flash.
While MS wants to compete with it.
Apple has embraced Photoshop, PDF, and Flash.
While MS wants to compete with it.
History:
Spreadsheet - Lotus 123 vs. Excel, till date Microsoft won the war not because of superior product, rather because of money and power. I still use Lotus for better analysis.
Word Processor: who will forget our loved WordPerfect? To my amazement many lawyers still rely on WordPerfect 5.1 for their paper work. Microsoft was not the pioneer; however they won the war because of bundling. And who will forget our historical Icon - Harvard Graphics, which Microsoft PowerPoint still cannot match, even twelve years later.
Those are their success stories: This will not be the first time that Microsoft has tried and failed woefully. Remember the first time Microsoft tried to challenge Adobe, (the Blog Heads will not remember) in the graphics design application with stolen name from Adobe Photoshop and Corel Draw; the program was called Microsoft Photo Draw - Disaster.
People need force Microsoft to put up superior products and not wait in the wings for somebody to come up something and bid brother Microsoft will jump in.
Note: This is about Microsoft and not about Bill Gates, whom I think is a wonderful human being. I know people will ask, what is the difference?
Notes: Don't judge Bill Gates through his donation. Judge him how he kills many companies with their owns ideas.
History:
Spreadsheet - Lotus 123 vs. Excel, till date Microsoft won the war not because of superior product, rather because of money and power. I still use Lotus for better analysis.
Word Processor: who will forget our loved WordPerfect? To my amazement many lawyers still rely on WordPerfect 5.1 for their paper work. Microsoft was not the pioneer; however they won the war because of bundling. And who will forget our historical Icon - Harvard Graphics, which Microsoft PowerPoint still cannot match, even twelve years later.
Those are their success stories: This will not be the first time that Microsoft has tried and failed woefully. Remember the first time Microsoft tried to challenge Adobe, (the Blog Heads will not remember) in the graphics design application with stolen name from Adobe Photoshop and Corel Draw; the program was called Microsoft Photo Draw - Disaster.
People need force Microsoft to put up superior products and not wait in the wings for somebody to come up something and bid brother Microsoft will jump in.
Note: This is about Microsoft and not about Bill Gates, whom I think is a wonderful human being. I know people will ask, what is the difference?
Notes: Don't judge Bill Gates through his donation. Judge him how he kills many companies with their owns ideas.
MS has attempted for years to topple Adobe & Apple in the arenas of professional press publication, ColorSync, Acrobat & digital photo / video processing.
Citizen Gates even went to the great lengths of buying millions of photographic rights, building a huge digital photo database & opening Corbis as his own company outside of MS, so he could control & make billions of royalties from professional photographers & publishing houses.
MS has lamely attempted to put out "prosumer" PhotoPC software for years without success to the point that they have to give it away with "Discount Dells".
Citizen Gates has also attempted to alter & undermine native Java / Flash coding with "Windows-compatible" versions of their own "interpretations" of Java/Flash in order to derail & dillute NON-MS coding on the Internet.
Gates has recently be very public about developing an Adobe Acrobat PDF killer-app within ShorthornOS in 2006/07/08/??.
MS doesnot have a built-in / included "Apple iLife Suite" equivilant (not even close) with MSXP.
This is such a slimy attempt to kill Photoshop/iPhoto/RAW file protocols within the entire digital creative industry in order to have world dominance in the realm of digital media all being "managed" through MSOS.
DOJ are splineless drones bowing down to the one they serve. All Hail Darth Gates!
that "analysis".
MS has attempted for years to topple Adobe & Apple in the arenas of professional press publication, ColorSync, Acrobat & digital photo / video processing.
Citizen Gates even went to the great lengths of buying millions of photographic rights, building a huge digital photo database & opening Corbis as his own company outside of MS, so he could control & make billions of royalties from professional photographers & publishing houses.
MS has lamely attempted to put out "prosumer" PhotoPC software for years without success to the point that they have to give it away with "Discount Dells".
Citizen Gates has also attempted to alter & undermine native Java / Flash coding with "Windows-compatible" versions of their own "interpretations" of Java/Flash in order to derail & dillute NON-MS coding on the Internet.
Gates has recently be very public about developing an Adobe Acrobat PDF killer-app within ShorthornOS in 2006/07/08/??.
MS doesnot have a built-in / included "Apple iLife Suite" equivilant (not even close) with MSXP.
This is such a slimy attempt to kill Photoshop/iPhoto/RAW file protocols within the entire digital creative industry in order to have world dominance in the realm of digital media all being "managed" through MSOS.
DOJ are splineless drones bowing down to the one they serve. All Hail Darth Gates!
that "analysis".
1. Make a product that can match the features and usability of their taget app. In the case of Photoshop, they have nothing that can come close to matching it, and nothing in the works(ie anything coming out in the next 12-18 months, probably longer).
2. Give legitimate reasons why a professional graphics house should spend the money on it, as well as possible OS switch. That is an extremely expensive switch. If the MS product is windows only, and not compatible with photoshop, it is dead before it gets a change to grow. Unless MS can show that their app is heads above its competitors, including tech support, useability, and compatibility, what is the incentive to go through a time consuming and expensive switch.
These articles about MS taking on Adobe are silly and pure fiction. If company X releases a very simple text editor, are they now competitors to Word? Microsofts current graphics app in beta is as close to photohop as the simple text editor is to Word.
1. Make a product that can match the features and usability of their taget app. In the case of Photoshop, they have nothing that can come close to matching it, and nothing in the works(ie anything coming out in the next 12-18 months, probably longer).
2. Give legitimate reasons why a professional graphics house should spend the money on it, as well as possible OS switch. That is an extremely expensive switch. If the MS product is windows only, and not compatible with photoshop, it is dead before it gets a change to grow. Unless MS can show that their app is heads above its competitors, including tech support, useability, and compatibility, what is the incentive to go through a time consuming and expensive switch.
These articles about MS taking on Adobe are silly and pure fiction. If company X releases a very simple text editor, are they now competitors to Word? Microsofts current graphics app in beta is as close to photohop as the simple text editor is to Word.
This is to funny. Adobe has a stronghold on the Design industry
and once they acquire Macromedia a near monopoly. No
professional designer is going to take anything Microsoft makes
seriously.
As a professional designer I would not buy MS software let alone
that I work on a Mac. But the web is moving away from WYSIWYG
tools. It's all CMS software running on servers and HTML/CSS
web sites that will rule. AJAX applications will control server
interaction for the future. Why would MS try and compete in
such a mature market?
This is just ridiculous and if Adobe stock drops again that means
buy, buy, buy!
- Analyst are funny people.
- by June 20, 2005 6:13 PM PDT
- Really why does everyone think MS can take on any company.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
Showing 1 of 2 pages (52 Comments)This is to funny. Adobe has a stronghold on the Design industry
and once they acquire Macromedia a near monopoly. No
professional designer is going to take anything Microsoft makes
seriously.
As a professional designer I would not buy MS software let alone
that I work on a Mac. But the web is moving away from WYSIWYG
tools. It's all CMS software running on servers and HTML/CSS
web sites that will rule. AJAX applications will control server
interaction for the future. Why would MS try and compete in
such a mature market?
This is just ridiculous and if Adobe stock drops again that means
buy, buy, buy!