Comments on: Apple office software seems likely

IGG Software has dropped the name "iWork" from its product lineup. Is Apple about to pick it up?

[Jonathan]

understand this is NOT a MS Office competitor

If true this isn't intended to take on MS Office. Its going to be a low cost solution for Mac users and will prob ship with new Mac systems. Windows has MS Works that comes with a scaled down version of Word. The only good solution out there for the Mac (Other then a hand full of one off apps that from what I've read have had mixed results.) is either then $500 MS Office or the ancient Appleworks. I've played with AW on a friends system. Simply: it sucks. And for an average consumer $500 is way to much to get a simple word processing app. Consequently Apple is filling the gap here.

True: it'll be far superior like everything else Apple does

NM

[Jonathan]

understand this is NOT a MS Office competitor

If true this isn't intended to take on MS Office. Its going to be a low cost solution for Mac users and will prob ship with new Mac systems. Windows has MS Works that comes with a scaled down version of Word. The only good solution out there for the Mac (Other then a hand full of one off apps that from what I've read have had mixed results.) is either then $500 MS Office or the ancient Appleworks. I've played with AW on a friends system. Simply: it sucks. And for an average consumer $500 is way to much to get a simple word processing app. Consequently Apple is filling the gap here.

True: it'll be far superior like everything else Apple does

NM

AW doesn't suck

I agree with the comments, with one exception: AW does not
suck. It's limited, but it's more useful, in many ways, than Word,
which I also use. It's certainly easier to use. Within its limitations,
it's excellent. Is it the right tool for a book project? No.

I will be glad to see an updated replacement, however, as AW is
showing its age. If the new app is done with Apple's usual skill,
it will be a delight to use.

[Al Johnsons]

agree with the comments

http://www.analogstereo.com/mazda_truck_b_series_owners_manual.htm

AW doesn't suck

I agree with the comments, with one exception: AW does not
suck. It's limited, but it's more useful, in many ways, than Word,
which I also use. It's certainly easier to use. Within its limitations,
it's excellent. Is it the right tool for a book project? No.

I will be glad to see an updated replacement, however, as AW is
showing its age. If the new app is done with Apple's usual skill,
it will be a delight to use.

[Al Johnsons]

agree with the comments

http://www.analogstereo.com/mazda_truck_b_series_owners_manual.htm

[kieranmullen]

My question... WHY?

You have Appleworks.. Where did that go? Will this new product be a new product or an upgrade for appleworks? What about Open Office (free) for the mac? http://porting.openoffice.org/mac/ooo-osx_downloads.html#download

Why Safari for the Mac when there is FireFox for the Mac? http://www.mozilla.org/products/firefox/all.html

They are putting money down the drain... again...

Repeat...

[dejo]

Safari is not new

"Why Safari for the Mac when there is FireFox for the Mac?"

Because Safari was introduced long before Firefox even existed.

Yes why... OpenOffice works and is free

I have been using OpenOffice - and while an Aqua version is still in the works, the current version does all I need, and is free. I would need compelling reasons to pay for a product.

[kieranmullen]

My question... WHY?

You have Appleworks.. Where did that go? Will this new product be a new product or an upgrade for appleworks? What about Open Office (free) for the mac? http://porting.openoffice.org/mac/ooo-osx_downloads.html#download

Why Safari for the Mac when there is FireFox for the Mac? http://www.mozilla.org/products/firefox/all.html

They are putting money down the drain... again...

Repeat...

[dejo]

Safari is not new

"Why Safari for the Mac when there is FireFox for the Mac?"

Because Safari was introduced long before Firefox even existed.

Yes why... OpenOffice works and is free

I have been using OpenOffice - and while an Aqua version is still in the works, the current version does all I need, and is free. I would need compelling reasons to pay for a product.

Not another over priced under featured prod

Great. Another over priced and under featured product from Apple. Anybody care to bet that this will be priced near MicroShaft's Office's price?

Just use Open Office and ignore it. Given Apple's history of software releases, this is most likly a portent of a new Apple OS to be coming out soon. An OS that, of course, does not support legacy products like this iWork.

[Jonathan]

*sniffs* Still no deodorant for the troll?

Come on oom you can do better then that. You have a rep to maintain as a troll. I see that you never bothered to respond to my posts. Hit a little to close to the mark on a couple of fronts didn?t I?

Not another over priced under featured prod

Great. Another over priced and under featured product from Apple. Anybody care to bet that this will be priced near MicroShaft's Office's price?

Just use Open Office and ignore it. Given Apple's history of software releases, this is most likly a portent of a new Apple OS to be coming out soon. An OS that, of course, does not support legacy products like this iWork.

[Jonathan]

*sniffs* Still no deodorant for the troll?

Come on oom you can do better then that. You have a rep to maintain as a troll. I see that you never bothered to respond to my posts. Hit a little to close to the mark on a couple of fronts didn?t I?

[David Arbogast]

A passionate market

I'm not sure this is a bad idea. Mac fans tend to be fanatics about all things Mac. Assuming Apple can offer file compatibility with current and future versions of Office (which should be simple since Microsoft releases the necessary information), I would bet that a large percentage of Mac users would purchase the software. If Mac users were interested in free software (as in zero acquisition cost), then they would probably already be running Linux or FreeBSD on cheap hardware. They certainly would not have already paid Apple prices for Apple hardware and software. Customer dedication could make this a profitable product.

I agree.

Apple has phenominal customer dedication. That's how they're able to grossly mark up their slower (compared to PCs) products. It's not the customer dedication (or psychosis) that I have a problem with, it's the customer shafting I have a problem with. Apple's well known to shaft their customers over and over again. Most of the world understands this and avoid Apple. Others....

hmmm.... come to think of it. I DON'T have a problem with Apple now. If people likes to get shafted, they deserve it.

[David Arbogast]

A passionate market

I'm not sure this is a bad idea. Mac fans tend to be fanatics about all things Mac. Assuming Apple can offer file compatibility with current and future versions of Office (which should be simple since Microsoft releases the necessary information), I would bet that a large percentage of Mac users would purchase the software. If Mac users were interested in free software (as in zero acquisition cost), then they would probably already be running Linux or FreeBSD on cheap hardware. They certainly would not have already paid Apple prices for Apple hardware and software. Customer dedication could make this a profitable product.

I agree.

Apple has phenominal customer dedication. That's how they're able to grossly mark up their slower (compared to PCs) products. It's not the customer dedication (or psychosis) that I have a problem with, it's the customer shafting I have a problem with. Apple's well known to shaft their customers over and over again. Most of the world understands this and avoid Apple. Others....

hmmm.... come to think of it. I DON'T have a problem with Apple now. If people likes to get shafted, they deserve it.

[Stan Johnson]

Apple is a music company now anyway

An Apple Office Suite is a stupid idea. The reason for MS Office on a Mac is that the majority of computer users use MS Office. If MS stops supporting office for the Mac Apple will be the loser.

Apple is now more of a music company now anyway. Computers seem so secondary to the iPod when speaking of Apple. Maybe it is time to switch to PC?

[Al Johnsons]

office for the Mac

http://www.analogstereo.com/acura_vigor_owners_manual.htm

[Stan Johnson]

Apple is a music company now anyway

An Apple Office Suite is a stupid idea. The reason for MS Office on a Mac is that the majority of computer users use MS Office. If MS stops supporting office for the Mac Apple will be the loser.

Apple is now more of a music company now anyway. Computers seem so secondary to the iPod when speaking of Apple. Maybe it is time to switch to PC?

[Al Johnsons]

office for the Mac

http://www.analogstereo.com/acura_vigor_owners_manual.htm

[Llib Setag]

Just wait & see. Then decide for yourself...

Wait for the MacWorld Convention Keynote speech by Steve Jobs. IF the "iWorksapp" IS actually announced, then check it out, then either use MS Office OSX,FreeOffice, Appleworks or other OpenSource Office apps out there.
It's just a tool & it is up to you. This is what freedom of choice in the marketplace is about.
Enjoy it!
StarOffice from Sun is soon to port over from Solaris to OSX Unix... worth a try, or stay with MSF-OSX.
It's up to Jobs & it's up to you.

[Llib Setag]

Just wait & see. Then decide for yourself...

Wait for the MacWorld Convention Keynote speech by Steve Jobs. IF the "iWorksapp" IS actually announced, then check it out, then either use MS Office OSX,FreeOffice, Appleworks or other OpenSource Office apps out there.
It's just a tool & it is up to you. This is what freedom of choice in the marketplace is about.
Enjoy it!
StarOffice from Sun is soon to port over from Solaris to OSX Unix... worth a try, or stay with MSF-OSX.
It's up to Jobs & it's up to you.