Comments on: Adobe to update PDF tools
Expanded editing features will be included in new versions of Acrobat and Reader, which are due for release by year's end.
Expanded editing features will be included in new versions of Acrobat and Reader, which are due for release by year's end.
January 1, 2010 4:00 AM PST
December 31, 2009 5:30 PM PST
December 31, 2009 2:10 PM PST
Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Related quotes
PDF reading is one area where Ghost View for Linux is far ahead of its Windows competitor. Maybe Microsft should add PDF ability to IE and just remove Adobe from the picture.
takes eons to load and is slow as hell. If I want to print
something I can go boil water and have a cup of tea before it's
done.
Luckily, I have Apple's built-in Preview program that views PDFs
super fast (as well as JPEGs, etc.). Printing? The same file that
seems to freeze Reader starts printing in seconds.
Of course there are some features in Reader that I need at times,
but having a stripped down PDF viewer like Preview is a exactly
what most people need for quick viewing of files. If Adobe
doesn't provide it then someone else should (like Apple did).
Robert
- Can you do better?
- by December 13, 2004 10:05 AM PST
- I have read the above comments and I have to say that your views of Adobe Reader are rather narrow minded. I was trained as a programmer and believe me when I tell you that it is not as easy as it sounds to make a simpler viewer. You have no idea what it takes to develop and package a piece of software. Also, you may not think so, but you need many of the built in features of Reader for things like security. You don't want Joe Shmo reading your confidential documents do you? Also, you forget the main reason we have pdf. It is a reliable and quite literally portable format that can be viewed on any platform. A lot of times we need things behind the scenes that we do not know we need. People complain about Microsoft and their security updates, but no one has done anything about it. They cannot develop or do not want to develop a better piece of software. If anyone here would like to try and build a better viewer, be my guest.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(5 Comments)