Version: 2008
  • On TV.com: TOP 10 Shows CANCELED Too Soon

Comments on: Microsoft--license to deal

You back my patent, I'll back yours. That could be the software giant's motto in its quest for intellectual property.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (6 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
Who needs Directors with Interlocking Patents
by savvysooner November 8, 2004 9:52 AM PST
Evidence of the utter failure of anti-trust. Maybe those open source, free software people are on to something!
Reply to this comment
Who needs Directors with Interlocking Patents
by savvysooner November 8, 2004 9:52 AM PST
Evidence of the utter failure of anti-trust. Maybe those open source, free software people are on to something!
Reply to this comment
More evidence the patent system is broken...
by rdean November 8, 2004 2:22 PM PST
The big companies all band together and form an interlocking web of patents that the little guy can't penetrate. I thought patents were supposed to protect the little guy from the big companies that had the resources to rip off their ideas and price them out of the market.
Reply to this comment
More evidence the patent system is broken...
by rdean November 8, 2004 2:22 PM PST
The big companies all band together and form an interlocking web of patents that the little guy can't penetrate. I thought patents were supposed to protect the little guy from the big companies that had the resources to rip off their ideas and price them out of the market.
Reply to this comment
This is wrong
by November 13, 2004 12:56 PM PST
Patenting FAT, an array of pointers. What is next, patenting the for loop or binary trees?

Patents and software go to together liek Bush and intelligent thought. They just don't mix. Look at all the advancements in software, from algorithms to computer languages. What if Dr. Stroustrup patented C++, or Richie did that with C? What about all the algorithms that programmers use everyday to produce faster code?

We would still be in the dark ages of computing, with no chance to escape. Copyright your code to your hearts content, but leave patents out of it.
Reply to this comment
This is wrong
by November 13, 2004 12:56 PM PST
Patenting FAT, an array of pointers. What is next, patenting the for loop or binary trees?

Patents and software go to together liek Bush and intelligent thought. They just don't mix. Look at all the advancements in software, from algorithms to computer languages. What if Dr. Stroustrup patented C++, or Richie did that with C? What about all the algorithms that programmers use everyday to produce faster code?

We would still be in the dark ages of computing, with no chance to escape. Copyright your code to your hearts content, but leave patents out of it.
Reply to this comment
(6 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

Latest tech news headlines

advertisement

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.

More feeds available in our RSS feed index.

advertisement