Comments on: Mystery virus strikes FBI, U.S. Marshals
Law-enforcement agencies are forced to shut down their networks after being affected by a virus of undetermined type and origin.
Law-enforcement agencies are forced to shut down their networks after being affected by a virus of undetermined type and origin.
Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.
Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.
Online security is threatened by more than hacking and phishing attempts. Check here for the latest updates on software vulnerabilities, data leaks, and rapidly spreading viruses--and learn how to protect your systems.
Add this feed to your online news reader
+ even FBI needs porn.
Apparently they run two networks. The virus affected the external one, not the private internal one.
I've been using Ubuntu for over 4 months, no viruses and it comes with a built in firewall along with AV software. I can email, surf the web and do everything else needed for day to day business and it's easier to set up a "dummy" account for civilians to use if necessary.
It just makes sense.
Who says they are not, and who said linux can't get infected?
As much as I've looked online, there are 3 possible viruses for Linux, just possible.
When I was using Windows, it was possible to get 3 viruses a day, every day of the year, and never have a repeat. The chances that this happened on Windows and not Linux are 99.999999999999999999% .
http://www.securityfocus.com/columnists/215
"Dave had some surprises up his sleeve as well. You'll remember that I said he was using a ThinkPad (running Windows!). I asked him about that, and he told us that many of the computer security folks back at FBI HQ use Macs running OS X, since those machines can do just about anything: run software for Mac, Unix, or Windows, using either a GUI or the command line. And they're secure out of the box. In the field, however, they don't have as much money to spend, so they have to stretch their dollars by buying WinTel-based hardware. Are you listening, Apple? The FBI wants to buy your stuff. Talk to them!"
If the FBI uses Windows in the field to stretch a dollar, do you really think they'll not be using WinTel machines for outside networks?
The Mac OS does not allow a program to install without user interaction. Furthermore... there is no method to get a program to self-replicate and spread itself to other computers.
Mac's don't have a virus problem because of the current OS architecture.... Trojans.... yes.... but nothing that can spread itself.
And that is what makes them more secure.
The Mac OS does not allow a program to install without user interaction. Furthermore... there is no method to get a program to self-replicate and spread itself to other computers.
Mac's don't have a virus problem because of the current OS architecture.... Trojans.... yes.... but nothing that can spread itself.
And that is what makes them more secure. "
So a mac can get a trojan? A trojan can allow a program to execute without user interaction, self-replicate, then spread. Lumiseonis exactly right. If Mac's and windows switch places everything would switch. Nothing is impossible for a skilled hacker or programmer.
Wrong..
A Mac can "get" a program after a user downloads it (on purpose or "driveby"). The Mac OS tells you that it's an application that is being downloaded. After the user OKs the download, the program will require the user to enter their user name and password in order for it to do any real damage.
Even if the user manages to make that many mistakes... there is still no way for that program to self-replicate.
So... yes.. a program can enter disguised.. it can do damage if the user allows it too.. but it can not spread.
@Lumiseon, re "You do know that Mac and Linux are just as hackable as Windows is, right?"
Wrong. Two radically different architectures (*nix vs. NT), and a track record showing literally millions of Windows infections for every one *nix variant (yes, Linux and OSX lumped together)?
Come back when you have actual facts to offer, and not ignorant generalization. thx in advance.
Did you read the article? Here's a quote from it:
"Nobody was able to hack into the systems on the first day of the contest when contestants were only allowed to attack the computers over the network, but on Thursday the rules were relaxed so that attackers could direct contest organizers using the computers to do things like visit Web sites or open e-mail messages."
The dude had PHYSICAL ACCESS to the Mac, as in like telling a person in front of the MacBook Air what to click on. You can hack any computer if you can get your hands on it. Try Command-S while rebooting a Mac. That logs you in as root in "Single User Mode" - the easiest "hack" in the world. But can you do it to a Mac over a network? I doubt it.
You do know that Mac and Linux are just as hackable as Windows is, right?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WRONG! But thanks for showing the world that you know nothing of which you speak.
Many businesses can't use Mac because they need special programs that only run on Windows.
Every program always comes out on Windows first, and then Mac.
Windows gets a lot of grief about their security holes, but honestly they are also the quickest to patch. An exploit only hitting a particular version of a service can go unpatched for years if not properly maintained.
I think in this day and age of very sophisticated viruses and botnets, I would imagine their are tons of backdoors into government systems that are still unknown.
_____
The Running Tally
http://www.therunningtally.com
Windows gets patched on....... Patch Tuesday.
Windows gets grief for security holes because there are tons of security holes being claimed as "features" of the OS.
That is absolute FUD. The first ever worm released was on a Unix machine. There have been worms and trojans that could self replicate on the Mac, the one with iChat comes to mind (ok, I grand you this, you still needed to accept a jpg file from the infected host). But anyway, wasn't it just yesterday that someone exploited a Java vulnerability, and could install and run any program on the Mac by simply visiting an infected website, (that is without any user interaction at all)?
Name one instance... just one.... of a program that can replicate and spread itself on a Mac.
There are none.
Anyone can make a Trojan for the Mac OS. I can write an applescript that runs the command sudo rm and delete my user folder.... however.. in order for it to work.. I have to ignore the warning "you are downloading an application".. or "XX.jpg is really an application..".. and enter my password...
What you cant do.. is make this program spread itself over a network or send out mass emails with a dangerous payload...
Why is that so hard to understand?
There is no way (currently) to get the Mac OS to spread malware.
If I'm wrong... prove it.
Find me a Mac virus.... even proof of concept....and I will eat crow.
"What you cant do.. is make this program spread itself over a network or send out mass emails with a dangerous payload..."
this one has already been done with ichat, as I said earlier, where the infected host would send a copy of the worm to other iChat contacts, disguised as a jpg file.
But, despite that, it is possible to do drive-by downloads on the Os, with the Java vulnerability mentioned yesterday.
So yes, maybe there isn't a known virus spreading itself among OS X users, but there have been both cases of:
a)worms using a compromised host to propagate, even though some user interaction was required on the RECEIVING end (not the host os)
b) programs able to install and run themselves without any user interaction at all
Now, if the OS allows for any of the above to happen, then its only a matter of time before someone manages to write a program that can do both.
Thanks for the info.. I must have missed the OSX/Leap-A worm. While it can indeed "spread itself"... it first needs the user to download, decompress and execute the file, and enter their admin password to cause any damage.
Also, the program cannot spread itself on intel based Macs.. and the problem was fixed and is no longer an issue.
Regarding the Java exploit.. That scared me too.. as I tried it out myself yesterday. However.. that is not an example of a program installing itself.. it's code that runs on an application that already resides on the host without making modifications (not sure which is worse...).
Anybody have some salt... maybe some crushed red peppers.. ? I've heard Crow is kind of gamey ;) And even though... as you said..... there really aren't any viruses for the Mac, I overlooked the Leap-A worm... and will now enjoy my crow for lunch.
You know, just because you say something ten billion times doesn't make it true no matter how much you may wish it to be so. Wake up and smell the burning plastic from your Mac. It happens. Get over it. Take precautions and move on with your life. You're seriously missing out on a lot of it in your burning hatred.
Reading Comprehension? Ever heard of it?
Ah, going for the personal attack instead of addressing the subject. How.... predictable.
Nevermind, you have made it abundantly clear that you do not wish to hear anything ... uncomfortable or troubling about your chosen product. That's fine- here's some more cotton to stuff in your ears so you won't have to deal with reality.
oh, your machine's been hacked by the Russians and is part of a botnet, by the way.
And how is that a virus?
I doubt we'll ever find out, but it's fun speculating. Personally, I think it was a Texas Iinstruments TI-99--4a with speech synthisizer that was the culprit. :)
Sure, Linux has viruses. You have to write them yourself and then install them on your machine yourself but Linux does have viruses.
Pretty sure OSX could have the same kind of viruses Linux has if someone were to write one.
Windows though. Windows makes getting viruses the easiest thing you'll ever do without trying.
- by wes2706404 May 24, 2009 8:21 AM PDT
- It's probably the taliban. They've been threatening to attack the US for a while now
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
Showing 1 of 2 pages (62 Comments)