Comments on: Teen takes responsibility for Twitter worms
Like the first worm, the second "Mikeyy" worm posts unwanted messages on users' Twitter pages, some of which taunt the micro-blogging site to fix its security.
Like the first worm, the second "Mikeyy" worm posts unwanted messages on users' Twitter pages, some of which taunt the micro-blogging site to fix its security.
Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.
Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.
Online security is threatened by more than hacking and phishing attempts. Check here for the latest updates on software vulnerabilities, data leaks, and rapidly spreading viruses--and learn how to protect your systems.
Add this feed to your online news reader
Who confesses to this kind of thing and how do you expect to trust that site now?
If I were Twitter I'd pay the guy a recurring consultancy fee and turn him loose on a test environment.
And there has got to be like 20 versions since then that have fixed security issues. But unless it is brought to your attention it won't be found and fixed. When it is brought to their attention though it typically gets fixed in less then a day.
You can't blame anyone. First off someone looking for holes is going to find them eventually. Second off looking at your own code doesn't work. It tends to all blur at some point. At least after it does what you want it too.
But how many times will a major developer patch something that has never been exploited? Lots...
Again. If someone spends enough time trying to break in their going to break in.
The obvious question should be why were they vulnerable to a 'famous' attach vector? So the kid gave them a weekend sweat and got them to secure their network, give him a break from the bloodsucking lawyers.
Yep. Good way to stop bad devs like the ones who left this hole open is what you said.
Luckily we have kids like the 17 y/o in the article defending us from poor development.
You need help, man...
I've always felt that in the case of terrorists, an even better verb would be "accepted blame". After all, when someone accepts *responsibility* for damage they've caused, it normally involves helping to undo the damage by paying for repairs, compensating victims, etc. Terrorists do none of those things.
Hackers who inflict some measure of damage, and do nothing to repair or compensate for the damage they've done, probably should be described in the media as accepting blame, too.
2 other files are hosted in http://content.ireel.com/ which appears to be hacked and the js files are removed too..
So, in my theory, that bambamyo guy (http://www.youtube.com/user/bambamyo, http://www.myspace.com/john_be_still) who owns the 110mb account, maybe the same skiddie who have access to ireel, and abused the XSS vulnerability..
- by jafarm66 April 26, 2009 11:05 PM PDT
- Good Job exposing the hole in Twitter.. I don't think you deserve jail or anything since you didn't cause any harm or steal any information.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(30 Comments)Too bad "The theives" aka "We're here to help" aka "We know whats best for you" Federal Gov''t will probably make an example of you.