Version: 2008

Comments on: Teen takes responsibility for Twitter worms

Like the first worm, the second "Mikeyy" worm posts unwanted messages on users' Twitter pages, some of which taunt the micro-blogging site to fix its security.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (30 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by monkeyfun14 April 12, 2009 10:44 AM PDT
Wow what a damn idiot.

Who confesses to this kind of thing and how do you expect to trust that site now?
Reply to this comment
by ZetaZeta_ April 12, 2009 4:27 PM PDT
From what I can tell, I see a nonmalicious hacker trying to help Twitter close a hole, and I see the kid is capable when it comes to website security. I'd check out his site.
by Random_Walk April 12, 2009 6:32 PM PDT
Hey - at least he had the stones to own up to it, and tried to not cause damage (or had criminal intent).

If I were Twitter I'd pay the guy a recurring consultancy fee and turn him loose on a test environment.
by n3td3v April 12, 2009 10:57 AM PDT
Incredible and stupid.
Reply to this comment
by colamix April 12, 2009 11:15 AM PDT
Six figure salary software 'engineers' and along comes a kid poking holes right through it. He will likely get sued because corporations would rather have gaping holes in their software than have their incompetence exposed.
Reply to this comment
by Rod Roddy April 12, 2009 5:42 PM PDT
Amen to that brother, although if it were the Government they would hire him.
by PhaseDMA April 12, 2009 8:13 PM PDT
The reality is you can't close these holes. I know a person that has been able to get into the admin side of phpbb forums in the same way for years.

And there has got to be like 20 versions since then that have fixed security issues. But unless it is brought to your attention it won't be found and fixed. When it is brought to their attention though it typically gets fixed in less then a day.

You can't blame anyone. First off someone looking for holes is going to find them eventually. Second off looking at your own code doesn't work. It tends to all blur at some point. At least after it does what you want it too.

But how many times will a major developer patch something that has never been exploited? Lots...

Again. If someone spends enough time trying to break in their going to break in.
by colamix April 13, 2009 7:27 PM PDT
From the Twitter blog: "The worm introduced to Twitter was similar to the famous Samy worm which spread across the popular MySpace"

The obvious question should be why were they vulnerable to a 'famous' attach vector? So the kid gave them a weekend sweat and got them to secure their network, give him a break from the bloodsucking lawyers.
by pablouk1 April 12, 2009 11:43 AM PDT
Good way to stop these fools is 10 years in jail, getting raped by some big fella will soon change their attitude.
Reply to this comment
by PWK64 April 12, 2009 12:53 PM PDT
I agree with Colamix. You pablouk1 are a ridiculous moron. To even suggest that a white collar crime of this magnitude warrants a brutal assault is beyond comprehension. BTW They have computers down at the farm now?
by this1! April 12, 2009 1:00 PM PDT
gotta agree with PWK here, the worms didn't really do much in the way of breaking laws (that i can think of, if no personal information of users was compromised) and if anything, hey, better some bored 17 year old that wants to promote his site, then some mad man bent on causing a firesale. (sorry just watched live free die hard for like the 8th time...)
by ZetaZeta_ April 12, 2009 4:30 PM PDT
"Good way to stop these fools is 10 years in jail, getting raped by some big fella will soon change their attitude."

Yep. Good way to stop bad devs like the ones who left this hole open is what you said.
Luckily we have kids like the 17 y/o in the article defending us from poor development.
by Random_Walk April 12, 2009 6:34 PM PDT
So pablouk01, let me get this straight: you're actually condoning and promoting pedophilic rape as a means of retribution?

You need help, man...
by SlimGem April 12, 2009 11:47 AM PDT
I wonder how bored he would be behind bars. Hey, say that ten times real fast.
Reply to this comment
by btipling April 12, 2009 12:06 PM PDT
Kid who created a myspace work got in big legal trouble after he blabbed his mouth about it.
Reply to this comment
by mediocrates--2008 April 12, 2009 12:47 PM PDT
Although terrorists and hackers prefer to claim "credit," for their actions, conscientious reporters use the term "responsibility" instead. You might want to rethink your headline, Steven.
Reply to this comment
by rhsc April 12, 2009 3:49 PM PDT
Spin away, mediocrates, spin away.
by Gabey8 April 12, 2009 11:46 PM PDT
"Although terrorists and hackers prefer to claim "credit," for their actions, conscientious reporters use the term "responsibility" instead."

I've always felt that in the case of terrorists, an even better verb would be "accepted blame". After all, when someone accepts *responsibility* for damage they've caused, it normally involves helping to undo the damage by paying for repairs, compensating victims, etc. Terrorists do none of those things.

Hackers who inflict some measure of damage, and do nothing to repair or compensate for the damage they've done, probably should be described in the media as accepting blame, too.
by daimajinbuu April 12, 2009 2:09 PM PDT
Hey Mikey, want to meet a real black-hat hacker? Cnet should never have mentioned your name...
Reply to this comment
by DrStrangelove23 April 12, 2009 5:16 PM PDT
Oh Mickeyy Mooney, you haven't just exposed a gaping hole, but you have opened a HUGE can of worms. You have REALLY angered quite a few people who are older, smarter, and were finding vulnerabilities YEARS before the internet (since you're too young to remember, there was this thing called a BBS and we used devices called 300 Baud Modems attached to our telephones to access it). You may not feel the pain of prisonrape, but you have truly invited a world of hurt upon yourself. Logically I would like to think, that you're only kidding to get attention, but you've REALLY outdone yourself! I feel so sorry for you, kiddo!
Reply to this comment
by imrui April 12, 2009 5:36 PM PDT
Second worm isn't caused by mikeyy, but another skiddie who exploited the XSS vulnerability, when I decoded the source js file used, the handle "bambamyo" came out from a 110mb.com account (one of two sites where the js files were hosted).. as of now, it appears to be removed..

2 other files are hosted in http://content.ireel.com/ which appears to be hacked and the js files are removed too..

So, in my theory, that bambamyo guy (http://www.youtube.com/user/bambamyo, http://www.myspace.com/john_be_still) who owns the 110mb account, maybe the same skiddie who have access to ireel, and abused the XSS vulnerability..
Reply to this comment
by BeauGiles April 12, 2009 8:11 PM PDT
Or he just decided to host it somewhere else incase one site got pwned...
by Harrison912 April 13, 2009 9:18 AM PDT
I'm typically on Twitter to socially market my safety and security site so I'm always interested an what's going on at there. These things are annoying but I'm glad Twitter took care of it. He's a smart kid, he just needs to channel it for good purposes.
Reply to this comment
by knowles2 April 13, 2009 12:19 PM PDT
And that why he should not end up in jail. where he will probably meet people who will be more than willing to use him and his skill for far more serious offenses and money making offence, which is a lot worst than pointing out a hole twitter.
by littleM April 13, 2009 10:55 AM PDT
Just think how many 'professional' crackers are disappointed to have this potentially lucrative exploit closed. Kids should leave these things to the ones who pillage in private.
Reply to this comment
by siyangqiu April 13, 2009 11:35 AM PDT
Why didn't he make the worm patch the holes instead. I remember there was a worm for linux and its name had to do with cheese,i think, and i patched up a hole.
Reply to this comment
by Dalkorian April 13, 2009 2:26 PM PDT
Most likely you're thinking of a winblows worm, many of them "patch" the flaws they exploit (conficker for example). The reason isn't so pure as you'd think - they don't want a competing worm taking over the machine, so they "patch" the flaw that let them in.
by grecs April 13, 2009 3:43 PM PDT
Let's open the responsible disclosure can of worms debate. :)
Reply to this comment
by Steve_KTG April 13, 2009 11:05 PM PDT
I wonder if he had time to learn how to drive; he seems fairly busy for such a bored guy. This is as good reminder as any to be aware of the risks among the numerous (and more obvious) positives to social networking; frequent contact comes with a cost in the form of risk. http://www.justaskgemalto.com/en/search/node/facebook is a good example of those risks.
Reply to this comment
by jafarm66 April 26, 2009 11:05 PM PDT
Good Job exposing the hole in Twitter.. I don't think you deserve jail or anything since you didn't cause any harm or steal any information.

Too bad "The theives" aka "We're here to help" aka "We know whats best for you" Federal Gov''t will probably make an example of you.
Reply to this comment
(30 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.

About Security

Online security is threatened by more than hacking and phishing attempts. Check here for the latest updates on software vulnerabilities, data leaks, and rapidly spreading viruses--and learn how to protect your systems.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Security topics

advertisement
advertisement