Comments on: Apple suggests Mac users install antivirus software
Apple advises Mac users to install antivirus software in nod that even Mac users aren't immune to rising malware threats.
Apple advises Mac users to install antivirus software in nod that even Mac users aren't immune to rising malware threats.
Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.
Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.
Online security is threatened by more than hacking and phishing attempts. Check here for the latest updates on software vulnerabilities, data leaks, and rapidly spreading viruses--and learn how to protect your systems.
Add this feed to your online news reader
Your best bet is to run AV software on your mail server (If you don't run your own mail servers choose one that provides AV like Google.) This will stop you from forwarding viruses to Windows users.
Oh sure, there ARE annoying popups on certain web sites and spam through email, but viruses on the Mac?
Not likely.
Stick to actual research genius.
personally, i hate mac. it think it is over-priced and proprietary. linux is hard to use as a desktop OS. so, i will stay with windows.
jw
Any Macintosh anti-virus software will have to be completely heuristics based since you cannot have a definition for a nonexistent virus.
I agree with what you say, but The *nix architecture will not stay safe forever its only a matter of time. This is just apple's way of saying "We told you to" and covering their company. Pretty smart if you ask me, not very customer loyal but this is apple we are talking about...
End of story is every computer NEEDS malware/anti-virus software to protect not just them but everyone else on the internet. If something gets out and starts hiding on machines owned by people who think they are immune they are putting everyone else at risk because at any time they could jump back out on the net and cause more problems.
Please, this isn't about what's better or what is more secure or what isn't. It's about being safe and taking every pre-caution to protect yourself. It's like riding in a car without a seat belt, your just asking to be paralyzed from the neck down. Get some malware protection now, every body.
http://www.broadbandreports.com/forum/r21345620-Rogue-AntiVirus-2009-on-a-MacBook-Pro~start=20
MAC: Uhhhh PC
PC: What is it MAC
MAC: Well I've got this rash and it hurts when I pee.
PC: Oh thats a virus MAC, not to worry, I'm sure your anti-virus will get rid of it
MAC: My what?
PC: Don't you use protection MAC?
MAC: ???? Protection thats for PC's, I'm a MAC we don't get viruses!!!!
PC: Well you have one, and well your probably going to die from it.
MAC: BUT......
PC: Yep you ****** yourself around around without being safe and now look at you.
MAC: ........
PC: OH PC's are stuffy, Vista has annoying popups, BLA BLA BLA..... I hope you suffer!
MAC: Can't you help me PC!!! I'll be better I swear!
PC: Well I guess I could ask my DAD Bill gates, If he could pay for a doctor visit.
MAC: REALLY! Wow that's swell PC!! I love you PC.
PC: I love you to MAC.
The End
Please stop spreading rubbish. It's a Windows virus effecting Windows not a Mac. Don't comment on something you obviously have no clue about.
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/securityfix/2006/03/when_macs_attack.html
Penguinisto thinks hes a superhero and AppleSuxLeo thinks hes better than the rest of us.
Fact is, in today's world, Windows, OSX, and Linux distributions are all equally vulnerable to infections. Every OS should use a form of antivirus and firewall. There nay not be as long of a list of viruses that can infect OSX or Linux machines, but without an antivirus or firewall an amateur hacker can hijack your system and take valuable info.
Window's is no the swiss cheese it used to be and OSX isn't the tank it used to be. Windows has taken massive strides to make it powerful player in native security, and OSX has entered the mainstream ill-prepared to deal with the security challenges Windows has been dealing with for years.
'nuff said.
2) "equally"? Funny that... practical counts show a handful of convoluted trojans for OSX that may or may not work, versus what, hundreds of thousands of active malware for Windows?
3) firewalls are a given. No one said anything about firewalls up in here. ;)
- by EB1158 December 2, 2008 8:11 PM PST
- I am by no means a Microsoft lover, and I use mac computers all the time and have no problems with the OS. But it is most definitely not as secure as other OS's. The reason Microsoft is so virus prone is because taking down the huge corporation that is Microsoft is equivalent to blowing up the death star to hackers. Why attack other OS's like OS X when far more people use Microsoft's operating systems, and will, in turn, be affected by the viruses? Not to mention that I remember reading an article here on CNET about a hacking competition where Vista, OS X, and Unix where put through there paces. And if i remember right, OS X was hacked on the first day of one of the areas of competition, where as Unix wasn't hacked until much later, and Vista wasn't hacked until the final day of competition. I'm not saying OS X is a bad OS, it is just not as secure as other operating systems. And I'm glad to see that Apple is issuing this suggestion, no matter when they did it. It shows that they care about there customers and don't want there computers to be infected with damaging viruses.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
Showing 3 of 4 pages (152 Comments)