Comments on: Math team solves the unsolvable E8
Eighteen mathematicians, lots of computing power produce 60GB solution for symmetrical structure with 248 dimensions.![]()
Eighteen mathematicians, lots of computing power produce 60GB solution for symmetrical structure with 248 dimensions.![]()
December 4, 2009 6:13 PM PST
December 4, 2009 4:56 PM PST
December 4, 2009 4:25 PM PST
Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Related quotes
I just hope it's in some way useful... to somebody. :-)
My gawd.
the reason? : you think you've reached a solution and the next thing you know.. it doesn't work when you plug it back into the equation. it just doesn't make any logical sense.
there is no need to get disappointed though. theoretically, there exists is a solution. but you need to solve the infinite equations of E∞ to obtain it.
BTW.. let me know what the answer is if you get around to actually solving it. :-)
Mahurshi Akilla
That in itself is already spooky. Spooky awe-inspiring. The adjectivial clause is redundant though.
Thank heavens for that bit of information! I was just about to
pronounce E8 as "Hyundai Sonata".
and computer science/technology. Perhaps this will make it a
touch easier for (pure) mathematicians to accept help from CS in
proving some of the major unsolved math issues such as the
Rieman Hypothesis or Poincare Conjecture. Perhaps.
naf Los Altos
any mucking around with computers. Just google the name
Grigori Perelman to see some of the details. I can see how
computers could be applied to the proof of the 4 color map
theorem (by examining all the cases exhaustively) but I'm not
certain how such an approach helps with the Riemann
hypothesis (you can't ever find all its zeros no matter how long
you compute so there is no exhaustive strategy available).
Finally I think the title of this article would be more accurate if
they changed it to "solves the intractable" rather than "solves the
unsolvable" which is just plain wrong (after all there are perfectly
respectable unsolvable problems in math).
others pay for this to be done? Is this useful for ANYTHING
besides giving mathematicians something to do?
Because right now it seems like it's a big fat waste of time and
effort - unless they can use these findings or techniques to stop
certain imperial occupations from continuing, certain fascists
from taking over the world, or possibly enable faster than light
travel to distant earth-like planets. How about calculating the
best way to reverse global warming? Simulating a genetic fix to
the human lusts for violence and abuse?
Otherwise the only results we'll see from this kind of research is
tripe like What the Bleep or The Secret.. and we certainly don't
need any more of them.
- techniques to stop certain imperial occupations from continuing
- certain fascists from taking over the world
- or possibly enable faster than light travel to distant earth-like planets
- calculating the best way to reverse global warming
- simulating a genetic fix to the human lusts for violence and abuse
and more like that.
There is one annoying thing with all this however, and its the fact that before a mathematical problem is actually solved its impossible to know which of all real world problems it will help solve.
Since that is the case the most cost efficient way for society is to maintain a big list of unsolved mathematical problems and give resources to very intelligent people so they can solve them. And that is how its been done for more than a 100 years.
Regarding E8, it plays major role in string theory (AKA "theory of everything").
I1 (competition to solve this group is fierce),
U2 (the biggest group in history),
B4 (key to time travel, as requested),
I5 (first to solve will get I5s all around),
S6 (popular with dumb blond Londoners),
K9 (a dog of a problem).
- OUTSTANDING!
- by godsmathguy March 24, 2007 8:52 AM PDT
- I am quite proud of this accomplishment and give much love to my fellow engineers and mathematicians for the tremendous amount of research and brainpower that went into making this happen. Although I am a military officer (former engineer and applied mathematician)I still can appreciate the potential this work has.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(35 Comments)If possible, this just might finally lead to a mathematical basis for TOE and Grand Unified Theory. In which case new physics, Applied Abstract Lie Algebra, Topology, and differential geometry (Abel, Einstein, Galois, Lie, Banneker, and math others would be proud) texts will need to be written to explore the implications. I thank God for blessing this team with the wisdom to work through a very complex Abelian Lie Group and am grateful computer science has finally allowed mathematicians to explore topics we have always been fascinated with but needed tremendous computer power to investigate. Now on to a universal formula for the n-th prime and a way to demonstate that math is to be enjoyed by all persons not just the geeks of the world (I include myself although not your typical one).
Have a blessed week.
godsmathguy