Comments on: Cheaper LEDs to light a green path?
Using plastic could help light-emitting diodes sell for less and compete with power-hungry traditional bulbs, company says.
Using plastic could help light-emitting diodes sell for less and compete with power-hungry traditional bulbs, company says.
November 27, 2009 4:27 PM PST
November 27, 2009 1:05 PM PST
November 27, 2009 11:52 AM PST
Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Related quotes
converted to heat. To arbitrarily consider it wasted is foolish.
Remember that in the colder climates, few people would
consider that heat as waste.
Whatever exact amount of energy would have been "wasted" as
heat from light bulbs must now be generated in your furnace or
boiler.
Then in the warmer climates, you'd have to compensate with
additional air conditioning if you're using conventional bulbs.
Perhaps it's a wash overall if you have equal cooling and heating
months in your locality.
You just need to be more careful when you label the heat from
light bulbs as wasted energy. Not everyone lives in California.
i personally have a pet turtle and i think he would be rather unhappy if i replaced his lamp with an led lol
but when it comes to my personal lighting i have a floressant lamp and a led one
to steer the discussion into a more fruitful direction, we should note down, that by replacing incandescent bulbs with LEDs, energy is saved if and only if:
You have it in a place, where only light, but not heat is needed, which means:
1. All outdoor lighting
2. Indoor lighting at elevated outside temperatures
Additionally, the higher lifespan of LED's , which is up to 60-fold that of an incandescent lamp, reduces litter and saves time and effort to replace it as well as it eliminates downtimes without light.
Furthermore the more evenly distributed wavelength spectrum of LEDs is not so depressing (in my opinion) than high red wavelength fraction light of incandescents.
bulbs are near the ceiling will make little difference.
The ceiling might not be the ideal placement for a heat source,
however, warm air will still rise and displace cooler air via some
amount of convection.
So without the hot incandescent light bulbs in ceiling fixtures,
what have you left? Cold air near the ceiling? Nope. The
warmer air in the room will always rise to the ceiling regardless
of what's up there. Without the incandescent bulbs, the average
temperature of the room will be a little lower.
Hey, I'm not knocking the new LED lights... I'd love to use them
during warmer weather.
Just making a point that the energy savings for certain people
during certain times of the year is not what it seems.
fluorescent bulbs on the market. I have been using several CFCs
in my house in areas where they can be left on for several hours
at a time - e.g. outdoors lighting, hallways etc. The energy
savings are amazing and the bulbs themselves last for around
10,000 hours. However, I agree that they are not yet suitable for
all applications. The prospect of super bright LEDs is very
exciting. The bulbs should never burn out and their energy
consumption will be very low. At this time I have several LED
flashlights. The light they emit is rather bluish. I imagine that
within a few years LED technology will advance to the point
where they will be suitable for home use.
Still, I eagerly products and advances in this area.
- Energy Savings??
- by Sir Limey January 22, 2007 7:34 AM PST
- Seems everyone jumped onto the bandwagon on saving s between LED and Incandescent but forgot to look at the original math. If it cost $5 to make the LED and $10 in parts to control it how long would I need to use it to be cost effective compared to my long life flurescent? How can they sell LED flashlights for $3 if the parts cost $15? Think about it before you comment.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(25 Comments)