Version: 2008
  • On GameSpot: $299 PS3 Slim and price cut announced!

Comments on: Silicon vs. CIGS: With solar energy, the issue is material

What should solar panels be made of? Silicon has history on its side, but the future may lie in CIGS.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (22 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
Solar panels/CIGS on rooftops sounds ideal
by jpsalvesen October 2, 2006 5:18 AM PDT
You'll get that double whammy:

- create electricity to power the air conditioning,
- less heat from the sun hitting the surface means less heat to aircondition away inside

Plus the fact that your
Reply to this comment
Solar panels/CIGS on rooftops sounds ideal
by jpsalvesen October 2, 2006 5:19 AM PDT
You'll get that double whammy:

- create electricity to power the air conditioning,
- less heat from the sun hitting the surface means less heat to aircondition away inside

Do they take this into account when they calculate the estimated ROI?
Reply to this comment
No electricity Needed fo Solar Cooling
by disco-legend-zeke October 2, 2006 8:10 AM PDT
the peak demand for electricity is created by air conditioning loads.

Remember the referigerator in your camper that ran on propaine? There are several absorption chillers that use hot water or engine exhaust as the energy input.

The most common application today is in cogeneration, the waste heat from gas turbine or diesel generators is used to air condition buildings.

Solar heated water can also be used. Of ocurse electricity is still needed to run fans and pumps, but using solar heat directly for cooling and heating bypasses the inefficiencies of converting to electricity and then converting to mechanical motion in an electric motor, and finally to cooling.

One advantage of solar input for air conditioning, the available solar energy tracks air conditioning demand.
Reply to this comment
Sounds like Sterling
by MrHandle October 2, 2006 10:37 PM PDT
That sounds like a Sterling engine app. That kind of stuff makes a lot of sense. If you combine a lot of these different techs and get away from things like Incandesent bulbs that are wasteful, we could do away with much of the fossil fuel issue.
Sounds like Sterling
by MrHandle October 2, 2006 11:09 PM PDT
Sounds like Sterling Engine apps, where you can use waste heat for cooling amoung other things. It's good to see that sort of efficiency. By using the energy from sunlight (especially in a solar-concentration/Sterling design) to offset heat waste, engines can be highly efficient.
by maxwellsagain December 6, 2009 3:09 PM PST
re: air conditioning, try white roofs, GSHP, and swamp coolers b4 u funk it up w/ anything hi-tech.
False hopes for CIGS
by Siliconsultant October 2, 2006 12:17 PM PDT
Misguided hopes, investments and government funding appropriated to CIGS and other thin films is probably the main reason the US market share of PV module manufacturing has monotonically and precipitously fallen from a leadership position of 45% in 1995 to about 9% in 2005. The smart money is not in the US, but in Japan, Germany, and other countries that have realized silicon is "where its at" for PV.

So CIGS is 100 time thinner. So what? Our Planet's crust contains 27% silicon (outdone only by oxygen at 46%) What could be more plentiful and widely available than sand -- Si02? There is 0.007% copper, 0.00001% indium, 0.0015% gallium, and 0.000009% selenium in the crust. And these elements are not particularly easy to mine in quantities required for gigawatts of solar cells. Do the math. Just the recent upsurge in flat panel display applications threw the indium markets is a tizzy.

Silicon photovoltaic feedstock material manufacturing is merely at a mismatch in planned capacity vs actual demand. This situation will correct itself within two years and leave CIGS in the (SiO2) dust with a nano-sized market share of world PV sales.
Reply to this comment
Silicon Shortage
by MrHandle October 2, 2006 10:45 PM PDT
lol. Yeah, I keep seeing about this "shortage" of Silicon, when it's the second most abundant material on Earth. I guess it requires very high heats to work with, but we'll never run out of the stuff. My guess is that they'll continue to find ways to refine the manufacture of it and improve efficiency a bit. I also think it will continue to dominate. CIGS may have a few niche apps, but that's about it in my view..
Silicon under pressure...?!
by steph111 October 2, 2006 2:02 PM PDT
One thing is clear based on the rather unusual statement from T.J. Rogers: The silicon-wafer solar guys appear rather scared and on the edge...otherwise the CEO of a publicly traded company like Rogers wouldn't be losing it like this in public...! I guess with more than a dozen CIGS startups after you and investors increasingly wondering whether silicon cell production is not a cashflow black hole, the open nerves are understandable...
Reply to this comment
Solar power is a joke
by lingsun October 2, 2006 3:32 PM PDT
Solar power is a joke. There's very little energy in a square foot of sunlight. It's never going to matter. It's just an impractical dream of environmentalists who don't want wind power in their own backyards.
Reply to this comment
a 100 sq meter house = 100 KW insolation -- even at 10% is 10KW
by disco-legend-zeke October 2, 2006 4:34 PM PDT
and for air conditioning, efficiencies could be much better.

no, solar is real. actually, petrolium is simply stored solar, after all.
Solar/Wind Power Hallucination
by Too Old For IT October 2, 2006 4:39 PM PDT
Both solar and wind power are a joke. Enter the friendly atom.

Either the Toshiba 4S or Mitsubishi APWR reactors provide more power per square foot than solar or wind power ever will.
View reply
Is it?
by MrHandle October 2, 2006 10:59 PM PDT
My solar powered calculators work just fine (during the day of course lol). And, they have more processing power than Eniac (the huge power-sucking first digital computer) did. The point is that we still use stuff like Incandescent bulbs that are extremely wasteful. If we would use energy much more efficiently, we wouldn't need so much of it. Solar alone isn't enough, but if we combine it with other things like wind, Sterling Engine, and intellingent energy management, we could be alright.

Personally, I'd like to see more effort put into developing fussion, but until that time, it doesn't hurt to try and get all we can from all possible sources.
Solar power no joke.
by galeso October 3, 2006 11:55 AM PDT
30 years ago the internet was a joke too. Currently solar has a 9 to 10 year payback period, not worth it at credit card rates if you are on the grid.

But wait, solar is expanding rapidly. Why? As it gets cheaper per watt more and more uses become economical. Those solar walk lights are everywhere, as solar calculators have been for years. Now warning signs and street signs are being lit with solar. Campers are buying solar panels that roll up. Hopefully, port-a-potties will get solar fans soon.

Got a cabin in the middle of nowhere? Why pay hundreds per pole to bring the grid to you? Just buy some panels, batteries, ... for less. Want to wi-fi a city? Just put a small solar panel, UPS, and an access point on every street corner. No need for wires or meter readers.

If solar ever gets cheap enough and durable enough (a big if), how much energy would be created if all roads were covered with spray-on solar panels?
Wrong
by DJRWolf October 4, 2006 5:18 PM PDT
If you cover about 10% of the state of Navada with solar panels. You would have enough energy to power the entire country. That is becouse enough energy from the sun hits the earth every hour that it takes us a year to match. Don't beleve me? Watch the Renewable Energy episode of Modern Marvels on the History Channel.
lingsun, you're name has no power either.
by foremanjf January 28, 2008 11:28 AM PST
No offense, lingsun, but that's about the most scientifically uneducated BS I've read in a long time, thanks for the laugh though! :)
by maxwellsagain December 6, 2009 3:46 PM PST
Sans atmos, downward direct solar irrad is about 1.3kw/m2. W/ an atmos, max is roughly 900 watts on a clear day. Given clouds, fog, diurnal/seasonal sun arc, sub-optimal angle of inclination/placement, etc., typical temperate zone irradiance might be in the neighborhood of 300-400 watts/m2 for 8 hours/day or 2,4-3.2kwh/day/m2, but more in the U.S. sw sun belt. Figure typical home roof area of 100m2 and maybe 1/3 of that well-positioned for photovoltaic reception. Ergo, in the sun belt 1/3 of your roof might receive a solar irradiance of 100kwh/day. So, if you could powder it w/ 35% efficient photovoltaics, you'd have 35kwh/day, which is 1050kwh/month, more than the standard home needs. With a few items like switch to fluorescent bulbs, energy-star appliances and remote shut-off power strip switches for solid state home electronics to stop dark current, average U.S. home electrical use could fall below 500kwh/month, except for air conditioning. Minimizing the latter need with white elastomeric roof paint and a ground source heat pump, you'd then have enough spare juice to charge your back-up power/load leveler aka your plug-in hybrid electric vehicle.

So, conceivably, w/i 5-10 years you could pretty much go off-grid. What that would cost is right now anybody's guess, but if it drops below a loanable $20k net initial entry above standard setup, it'll get VERY tempting. Let's see...rebuild my deck w/a fancy barbecue or go off-grid? Hmmm....
CPV, smaller expense
by fireofenergy October 4, 2006 7:46 PM PDT
Perhaps fossil fuels will be cheaper and so abundant in the future that solar will never compete? However, in the mean time, CPV could make up the difference since only a small amount of expense is shared with such things as mass produced mirrors, sensors and motors.
Reply to this comment
Solar could be our saviour
by lmacmich August 28, 2007 11:32 AM PDT
Whichever one wins the Battle, solar is by far the best solution to all our energy problems. Nuclear is too dangerous (think terrorism) and fossil fuels will pollute us to extinction. The only good answer is solar. We just need to work together to automate the manufacturing processes so much that we can roll them out and install them by the terawatt. Cost will definitely beat out fossil fuels very soon with economies of scale. Let's all jump on the band wagon here. There is more than enough room for all of us here.
Reply to this comment
Electroplating of solar cell conductors
by persimmons2 October 14, 2007 11:14 PM PDT
Regardless of which method is used - Si or CIGS - electroplating of solar cell conductors will be used to boos solar cell efficiencies. -Rob Schetty
Reply to this comment
by Impala1948 September 23, 2008 1:53 AM PDT
How does Dyesol's DSC technology rate against thin film and conventional silicon based solar? The market cap of Dyesol is still extremely low relative to alternative players across the field.
Reply to this comment
(22 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

Latest tech news headlines

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.

More feeds available in our RSS feed index.

advertisement